MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) ranks higher at 61/100 vs OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Image 2 at 22/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Image 2 | MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Model | Dataset |
| UnfragileRank | 22/100 | 61/100 |
| Adoption |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| Quality | 0 | 1 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Starting Price | $8.00e-6 per prompt token | — |
| Capabilities | 8 decomposed | 11 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Combines GPT-5.4's advanced reasoning engine with GPT Image 2's generative capabilities in a single unified model, allowing sequential workflows where text reasoning outputs can directly feed into image generation requests without context switching or API round-trips. The architecture maintains conversation state across modalities, enabling iterative refinement where generated images can be analyzed and regenerated based on reasoning about previous outputs.
Unique: Integrates reasoning and image generation in a single model context rather than chaining separate APIs, eliminating context loss and enabling direct token-level coupling between reasoning outputs and image prompts. GPT-5.4's reasoning capabilities directly influence image generation parameters without intermediate serialization.
vs alternatives: Faster than chaining GPT-4 reasoning + DALL-E 3 because it eliminates API round-trip latency and maintains unified context, while providing tighter coupling between logical decisions and visual outputs than multi-step workflows.
Processes images as input through GPT-5.4's vision encoder, enabling detailed visual understanding, scene analysis, OCR, object detection, and spatial reasoning. The model uses transformer-based vision processing to extract semantic features from images and reason about visual content in natural language, supporting both single-image and multi-image comparative analysis within a single context window.
Unique: Combines vision understanding with GPT-5.4's advanced reasoning, enabling not just object detection but causal reasoning about visual scenes (e.g., 'why is this person smiling' rather than just 'person detected'). Uses unified transformer architecture for both text and vision tokens, avoiding separate vision-language alignment layers.
vs alternatives: More contextually aware than Claude's vision or Gemini's vision because it applies GPT-5.4's superior reasoning to visual analysis, producing more nuanced interpretations of complex scenes and relationships.
Enables image generation where parameters (style, composition, subject matter) are dynamically determined by prior reasoning steps or conditional logic. The model evaluates conditions (e.g., 'if sentiment is positive, use warm colors') and translates reasoning outputs into structured image generation prompts, allowing programmatic control over generation without manual prompt engineering.
Unique: Reasoning outputs directly influence image generation parameters within a single model, eliminating the need for external conditional logic or prompt templating. The model learns to map reasoning conclusions to visual attributes without explicit instruction.
vs alternatives: More flexible than static prompt templates because reasoning can adapt generation parameters based on context, whereas tools like Replicate or Hugging Face require pre-defined parameter schemas.
Generates code (Python, JavaScript, etc.) based on visual inputs or reasoning about visual requirements. The model can analyze UI screenshots, diagrams, or design mockups and generate corresponding implementation code, or reason about visual problems and produce solutions. Supports multi-file code generation and maintains consistency across generated code artifacts.
Unique: Combines GPT-5.4's code generation with vision understanding in a single pass, enabling direct visual-to-code translation without intermediate design-to-specification steps. Uses reasoning to understand design intent before generating code, improving semantic correctness.
vs alternatives: More semantically accurate than Figma plugins or screenshot-to-code tools because GPT-5.4's reasoning understands design intent and component relationships, not just pixel-level layout.
Supports multi-turn workflows where generated images are analyzed, critiqued, and regenerated based on feedback. The model maintains conversation history across image generation cycles, enabling users to request modifications ('make the colors warmer', 'add more detail to the background') and regenerate images with cumulative refinements. Each iteration builds on previous reasoning about what worked and what didn't.
Unique: Maintains semantic understanding of refinement requests across multiple generations, learning from feedback patterns to improve subsequent iterations. Unlike stateless image APIs, this approach builds a model of user intent over time.
vs alternatives: More efficient than manual prompt engineering with DALL-E because the model learns from feedback and adapts generation strategy, whereas DALL-E requires explicit prompt rewrites for each variation.
Streams text reasoning and analysis in real-time while image generation occurs asynchronously, enabling progressive UI updates and early feedback. The model can stream reasoning tokens while queuing image generation, allowing users to see analysis results before images are ready. Supports token-level streaming for text combined with image generation status updates.
Unique: Decouples text streaming from image generation, allowing reasoning to be delivered immediately while images generate asynchronously. Uses separate token streams for text and image status, enabling fine-grained UI updates.
vs alternatives: More responsive than batch APIs because users see reasoning results in real-time, whereas traditional image generation APIs block until all outputs are ready.
Enables searching and retrieving images based on semantic descriptions, reasoning about visual similarity, and matching images to text queries. The model encodes both text and images into a shared semantic space, allowing queries like 'find images similar to this design concept' or 'retrieve images matching this description'. Supports ranking and filtering results based on semantic relevance.
Unique: Uses GPT-5.4's unified text-image embedding space to enable semantic search without separate vision and language models, improving alignment between text queries and image results.
vs alternatives: More semantically accurate than keyword-based image search because it understands conceptual relationships, whereas traditional tagging requires manual annotation.
Generates multiple images in a single workflow while maintaining visual consistency across outputs (same character, style, composition). The model uses reasoning to establish consistency parameters and applies them across batch generations, enabling creation of image series or variations that share visual coherence. Supports both sequential batch processing and parallel generation requests.
Unique: Uses reasoning to establish and enforce consistency rules across multiple generations, learning from previous outputs to improve coherence in subsequent images. Maintains implicit state about character/style definitions across batch.
vs alternatives: More consistent than independent DALL-E calls because the model reasons about consistency requirements and applies them systematically, whereas separate API calls have no shared context.
Provides 2.5 million manually-annotated object instances across 330,000 images with dual segmentation encoding: polygon coordinates for precise boundary definition and RLE (run-length encoding) for efficient storage and computation. Each instance includes bounding box coordinates in [x, y, width, height] format, category label from 80 object classes, and instance-level unique identifiers enabling per-object tracking and evaluation. Annotations are structured in JSON format with hierarchical organization linking images to annotations to categories, supporting both dense object scenes and sparse single-object images.
Unique: Dual segmentation encoding (polygon + RLE) in single dataset enables both precise boundary analysis and efficient computational workflows; 2.5M instances across 330K images provides scale unmatched by contemporaneous datasets (ImageNet had ~1.2M images, PASCAL VOC had ~11K images)
vs alternatives: Larger and more densely annotated than PASCAL VOC (11K images, ~6 objects/image) and more task-diverse than ImageNet (classification-only); RLE encoding enables 10-100x faster mask loading than polygon-only formats
Provides keypoint annotations for all people in images using a standardized 17-joint skeleton model (head, shoulders, elbows, wrists, hips, knees, ankles) with (x, y, visibility) tuples per joint. Visibility flag indicates whether keypoint is annotated (1), occluded (0), or outside image bounds (0). Keypoints are linked to parent person instances via instance ID, enabling pose estimation evaluation at both individual and crowd-level scales. Annotations follow COCO Keypoints task specification with consistent coordinate system across all 330K images.
Unique: Standardized 17-joint skeleton with explicit visibility flags enables robust evaluation of pose estimation under occlusion; linked to instance segmentation masks allows joint-level accuracy analysis within person bounding boxes
MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) scores higher at 61/100 vs OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Image 2 at 22/100. MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) also has a free tier, making it more accessible.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than OpenPose dataset (no visibility flags) and larger scale than Human3.6M (3.6M frames vs 330K images); visibility annotations enable explicit occlusion handling unlike MPII (which lacks visibility metadata)
COCO ecosystem includes community-created extensions (COCO-Stuff, COCO DensePose, COCO Panoptic) that extend base dataset with additional annotations while maintaining compatibility with COCO API and evaluation infrastructure. Extensions follow COCO format and evaluation standards, enabling seamless integration into existing pipelines. Community contributions are vetted and published as official COCO variants, ensuring quality and standardization. Variant creation process is documented, enabling researchers to create custom extensions.
Unique: Standardized extension process enables community contributions while maintaining compatibility; official variants (Stuff, DensePose, Panoptic) are vetted and published, ensuring quality and discoverability
vs alternatives: More extensible than fixed datasets; community variants enable specialized use cases without forking; standardized format prevents fragmentation unlike ad-hoc dataset variants
Provides 1.65 million image-caption pairs (5 captions × 330K images) with natural language descriptions written by human annotators. Each caption is a free-form English sentence describing objects, actions, and scene context without enforced length limits or structured templates. Captions are stored in JSON format linked to image IDs, enabling training of vision-language models for image captioning, visual question answering, and cross-modal retrieval. Multiple captions per image capture linguistic diversity and alternative descriptions of the same visual content.
Unique: 5 captions per image (vs 1 in most datasets) captures linguistic diversity and enables robust evaluation of caption generation variability; 1.65M caption-image pairs provide scale for training large vision-language models
vs alternatives: 5x more captions per image than Flickr30K (1 caption/image) enabling better linguistic diversity modeling; larger scale than Visual Genome (108K images) while maintaining natural language quality vs automated alt-text
Extends base 80 object categories with 91 additional 'stuff' categories (background materials, textures, regions like sky, grass, wall) enabling dense semantic segmentation of entire images. Stuff categories are annotated as pixel-level masks without instance boundaries — all sky pixels are labeled 'sky' regardless of continuity. COCO-Stuff combines instance segmentation (80 objects) with semantic segmentation (171 total categories including stuff), stored as single-channel PNG masks where pixel value encodes category ID. Enables panoptic segmentation evaluation combining instance and stuff predictions.
Unique: 171-category taxonomy combining 80 instance objects + 91 stuff categories enables panoptic segmentation in single dataset; pixel-level masks for stuff enable dense scene understanding without instance boundaries
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than ADE20K (150 categories) and larger scale than Cityscapes (5K images); unified instance+stuff annotation enables panoptic evaluation unlike separate semantic/instance datasets
Combines instance segmentation (80 object categories with boundaries) and semantic segmentation (171 stuff categories without boundaries) into single panoptic prediction task. Evaluation uses Panoptic Quality (PQ) metric decomposed into Segmentation Quality (SQ — IoU of matched predictions) and Recognition Quality (RQ — detection rate). Panoptic masks encode both category ID and instance ID, enabling evaluation of both 'what' (category) and 'which' (instance identity) predictions. Standardized evaluation protocol with server-side metric computation ensures consistent benchmarking across submissions.
Unique: Panoptic Quality metric with explicit SQ/RQ decomposition enables fine-grained analysis of segmentation vs recognition errors; unified instance+stuff evaluation in single task forces models to handle both prediction types efficiently
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than separate instance/semantic benchmarks; PQ metric better captures real-world scene understanding than independent metrics; standardized evaluation prevents metric gaming unlike custom evaluation scripts
Provides dense 2D-to-3D correspondence maps for human bodies, mapping each pixel in a person instance to a 3D human body model surface. Annotations include UV coordinates (parameterization of 3D body surface) and body part indices enabling pixel-level body surface understanding. DensePose enables training of models that predict where each image pixel corresponds to on a canonical 3D human body, useful for pose transfer, virtual try-on, and detailed human understanding. Available from 2020 dataset version onwards, extends keypoint annotations with dense surface coverage.
Unique: Dense 2D-to-3D surface correspondence enables pixel-level body understanding beyond skeleton keypoints; UV parameterization allows transfer of appearance and shape across different people and poses
vs alternatives: More detailed than keypoint-only annotations (17 joints vs millions of surface points); enables pose transfer unlike keypoint datasets; larger scale than DensePose-specific datasets
Provides standardized evaluation metrics for each task (Average Precision for detection, IoU for segmentation, OKS for keypoints, BLEU/METEOR/CIDEr for captions, PQ for panoptic) computed server-side on held-out test set. Leaderboard system accepts structured JSON result submissions in COCO format, validates format, computes metrics, and ranks submissions by primary metric. Evaluation infrastructure ensures consistent benchmarking across all submissions and prevents metric gaming through standardized computation. Metrics are task-specific: AP/AP50/AP75 for detection, mIoU for segmentation, OKS for keypoints, CIDEr for captions.
Unique: Server-side metric computation prevents metric gaming and ensures consistency; task-specific metrics (AP, OKS, CIDEr, PQ) are standardized across all submissions enabling fair comparison; public leaderboard provides transparency and reproducibility
vs alternatives: More rigorous than self-reported metrics (prevents cherry-picking); standardized evaluation prevents metric implementation variations unlike custom evaluation scripts; public leaderboard enables community comparison unlike proprietary benchmarks
+3 more capabilities