| 0 |
| Quality | 0 | 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Starting Price | $3.00e-8 per prompt token | $3.00e-6 per prompt token |
| Capabilities | 10 decomposed | 8 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Executes forward passes using a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture where only 3.6B of 21B parameters are active per token, routing each token to specialized expert sub-networks via learned gating functions. This sparse activation pattern reduces computational cost and memory bandwidth compared to dense models while maintaining parameter capacity for diverse reasoning tasks.
Unique: Uses a 21B parameter MoE architecture with only 3.6B active parameters per forward pass, achieving dense-model capability with sparse-model efficiency through learned expert routing — distinct from dense models like Llama 2 70B and from other MoE implementations like Mixtral that use different expert counts and gating strategies
vs alternatives: Offers better inference efficiency than dense 20B models (lower latency, memory) while maintaining OpenAI training quality, and provides open-weight licensing (Apache 2.0) unlike proprietary GPT-4 variants
Maintains coherent multi-turn dialogue by processing conversation history within a fixed context window, using attention mechanisms to weight recent and relevant prior messages while discarding or summarizing older context when token limits are approached. The model learns to extract key information from conversation history to maintain semantic continuity across turns.
Unique: Leverages MoE architecture to maintain coherent multi-turn reasoning with selective expert activation — experts specializing in dialogue coherence and context tracking are preferentially routed for conversation continuation, versus dense models that apply uniform attention across all parameters
vs alternatives: Maintains conversation quality comparable to larger dense models while using 3.6B active parameters, reducing inference cost per turn versus GPT-3.5 or Llama 2 70B for long-running conversations
Generates syntactically valid code across multiple programming languages by learning patterns from training data that includes code repositories, technical documentation, and problem-solution pairs. The model applies language-specific reasoning to produce working implementations, debug explanations, and architectural suggestions for technical problems.
Unique: MoE routing allows specialized experts to activate for different programming languages and problem types — language-specific experts handle syntax and idioms while reasoning experts handle algorithm design, versus dense models applying uniform computation across all code domains
vs alternatives: Provides code generation capability comparable to Copilot or Claude at lower inference cost due to sparse activation, with open-weight licensing enabling local fine-tuning for domain-specific code patterns
Answers factual and conceptual questions by retrieving and synthesizing relevant knowledge from training data, applying reasoning to connect concepts across domains. The model generates coherent explanations that cite reasoning steps and provide context-appropriate detail levels based on question complexity.
Unique: MoE architecture routes different question types to specialized experts — domain-specific experts (science, history, technology) activate selectively based on question content, allowing efficient knowledge synthesis without computing all parameters for every query
vs alternatives: Achieves knowledge synthesis quality comparable to larger models while using 3.6B active parameters, reducing latency and cost versus GPT-3.5 for knowledge-heavy applications
Interprets complex, multi-step instructions and decomposes them into executable sub-tasks, then generates outputs following specified constraints (format, length, tone, structure). The model learns to parse instruction syntax, identify priorities, and handle edge cases like conflicting constraints or ambiguous requirements.
Unique: MoE routing enables instruction-parsing experts to activate first, decomposing complex requirements before routing to task-specific experts for execution — versus dense models that process instructions and execution in a single forward pass
vs alternatives: Handles multi-step instruction following with comparable quality to GPT-4 while using sparse activation, reducing per-token cost for instruction-heavy workflows
Generates original creative content (stories, poetry, marketing copy, dialogue) by learning stylistic patterns, narrative structures, and genre conventions from training data. The model applies learned constraints (rhyme schemes, character consistency, tone) to produce coherent creative outputs that match specified requirements.
Unique: MoE architecture allows style-specific experts (poetry, narrative, dialogue, marketing) to activate based on content type, enabling more consistent stylistic adherence than dense models that apply uniform parameters across all creative domains
vs alternatives: Produces creative content quality comparable to larger models while using sparse activation, reducing inference cost for high-volume content generation workflows
Condenses long-form text into concise summaries by identifying key information, removing redundancy, and preserving essential meaning. The model learns to extract structured information (entities, relationships, facts) from unstructured text and present it in specified formats (bullet points, JSON, tables).
Unique: MoE routing activates summarization experts for compression and extraction experts for structured data generation, allowing efficient handling of different extraction tasks without computing all parameters
vs alternatives: Provides summarization and extraction quality comparable to larger models while using sparse activation, reducing latency and cost for high-volume document processing
Translates text between languages and generates content in non-English languages by learning multilingual patterns from training data. The model preserves meaning, tone, and context-appropriate phrasing across language pairs, and can switch between languages within a single response.
Unique: MoE architecture includes language-specific experts for major language pairs, allowing efficient routing to appropriate experts based on source and target languages rather than computing translation parameters for all language combinations
vs alternatives: Provides translation quality comparable to specialized translation models while maintaining general-purpose reasoning capability, with sparse activation reducing per-token cost versus dense multilingual models
+2 more capabilities
Generates natural language responses mimicking Claude 3 Sonnet/Opus writing style through fine-tuning on Qwen2.5 72B base model. Uses instruction-tuned architecture to follow complex multi-step prompts while maintaining coherent, well-structured prose with appropriate tone and formality levels. The model learns stylistic patterns from Claude outputs during fine-tuning rather than using retrieval or prompt engineering alone.
Unique: Fine-tuned specifically on Claude 3 Sonnet/Opus output patterns rather than generic instruction-tuning, creating a style-matched alternative that preserves Anthropic's prose characteristics while running on Qwen2.5's 72B architecture
vs alternatives: Offers Claude-quality writing at lower cost than Anthropic's API and with more deployment flexibility than proprietary models, though with less transparency about training methodology than fully open-source alternatives like Llama
Maintains coherent multi-turn dialogue through transformer-based attention mechanisms that track conversation history and speaker context. The instruction-tuned architecture processes entire conversation threads as input, allowing the model to reference previous exchanges, maintain consistent character/tone, and resolve pronouns and references across turns without explicit memory structures.
Unique: Inherits Qwen2.5's instruction-tuning approach to conversation, which explicitly trains on multi-turn formats with clear role markers, enabling better context resolution than models trained primarily on single-turn examples
vs alternatives: Simpler integration than systems requiring external memory stores (RAG, vector DBs) since context is handled natively, but less sophisticated than models with explicit memory architectures or retrieval-augmented approaches for very long conversations
Both OpenAI: gpt-oss-20b and Magnum v4 72B offer these capabilities:
Generates creative text including stories, essays, marketing copy, and other original content by learning stylistic patterns from Claude's creative outputs. The model uses transformer attention to maintain narrative coherence, character consistency, and thematic development across generated text. Fine-tuning captures Claude's approach to balancing creativity with clarity.
Magnum v4 72B scores higher at 25/100 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-20b at 23/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Generates code snippets and technical explanations by applying instruction-tuned patterns learned from fine-tuning on Claude outputs. The model understands code context from natural language descriptions, can generate multiple programming languages, and provides explanations alongside code. Implementation relies on transformer attention over code tokens and learned associations between natural language intent and code patterns.
Unique: Fine-tuned on Claude's code generation outputs, capturing Anthropic's approach to code explanation and safety considerations (e.g., error handling suggestions) rather than pure code-to-code translation
vs alternatives: Provides better code explanations and safety context than specialized code models like CodeLlama, but likely slower and less specialized than models fine-tuned specifically on code-only datasets
Applies learned chain-of-thought reasoning patterns from Claude fine-tuning to break down complex problems into steps. The model generates intermediate reasoning steps before final answers, using transformer attention to track logical dependencies across reasoning chains. This is achieved through instruction-tuning on examples where Claude explicitly shows reasoning work.
Unique: Inherits Claude's explicit chain-of-thought training approach, which emphasizes showing reasoning work as part of the output rather than reasoning internally, making reasoning patterns visible and auditable
vs alternatives: More transparent reasoning than models without explicit chain-of-thought training, but less specialized than models fine-tuned specifically on mathematical reasoning datasets or formal logic
Condenses long-form text into summaries while preserving key information, using attention mechanisms to identify salient content and instruction-tuned patterns for summary formatting. The model learns from Claude's summarization style, which emphasizes clarity and hierarchical organization of information. Works by attending to important tokens and generating compressed representations.
Unique: Fine-tuned on Claude's summarization outputs, which emphasize hierarchical structure and clear topic organization rather than extractive summarization, producing more readable abstracts
vs alternatives: Better prose quality and readability than extractive summarization tools, but less specialized than models fine-tuned specifically on summarization tasks or using dedicated abstractive architectures
Executes complex, multi-part instructions by parsing task structure and maintaining execution context across steps. The instruction-tuned architecture learns to identify task boundaries, handle conditional logic (if-then patterns), and sequence operations correctly. Implementation relies on transformer attention to track task state and learned patterns from Claude's instruction-following training.
Unique: Trained on Claude's instruction-following patterns, which emphasize explicit acknowledgment of task structure and step-by-step execution reporting, making task progress transparent
vs alternatives: More reliable instruction-following than base models without instruction-tuning, but less specialized than models with explicit task planning architectures or reinforcement learning from human feedback on instruction compliance
Answers questions by understanding context, identifying relevant information, and generating coherent responses. Uses transformer attention to locate answer-relevant tokens and instruction-tuned patterns to format responses appropriately. The model learns from Claude's question-answering style, which emphasizes accuracy, nuance, and acknowledgment of uncertainty.
Unique: Fine-tuned on Claude's QA outputs, which emphasize acknowledging uncertainty, providing nuanced answers, and explaining reasoning rather than simple factual retrieval
vs alternatives: Better answer quality and nuance than retrieval-based QA systems, but without external knowledge bases or web search, limited to training data knowledge unlike RAG-augmented systems
Generates creative text including stories, essays, marketing copy, and other original content by learning stylistic patterns from Claude's creative outputs. The model uses transformer attention to maintain narrative coherence, character consistency, and thematic development across generated text. Fine-tuning captures Claude's approach to balancing creativity with clarity.
Unique: Fine-tuned on Claude's creative outputs, which balance imaginative storytelling with clarity and coherence, producing more readable creative content than models trained purely on internet text
vs alternatives: Better prose quality and narrative coherence than base language models, but less specialized than models fine-tuned specifically on creative writing datasets or with explicit story structure training