| 0 |
| Quality | 0 | 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Starting Price | $1.10e-6 per prompt token | $6.00e-7 per prompt token |
| Capabilities | 5 decomposed | 12 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Implements OpenAI's chain-of-thought reasoning architecture with high reasoning_effort setting, allocating extended computational budget to internal reasoning steps before generating responses. The model performs multi-step logical decomposition for STEM problems, explicitly working through intermediate reasoning states rather than direct answer generation. This is achieved through a configurable reasoning effort parameter that controls the depth and duration of the internal reasoning process.
Unique: Implements configurable reasoning effort levels (low/medium/high) that directly control internal computation budget allocation, allowing developers to trade latency and cost for reasoning depth — a design pattern distinct from fixed-capacity reasoning models. The high setting specifically optimizes for STEM domains through domain-specific reasoning token allocation.
vs alternatives: Outperforms GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet on STEM benchmarks while maintaining lower cost than o3-full, making it the optimal choice for cost-sensitive STEM applications requiring extended reasoning.
Provides REST API access to the o3-mini-high model through OpenAI's standard chat completion endpoint, supporting both streaming and non-streaming response modes. Requests are authenticated via API key and transmitted over HTTPS, with responses formatted as JSON containing token usage metadata, finish reasons, and generated text. The streaming variant uses server-sent events (SSE) to deliver tokens incrementally, enabling real-time response rendering in client applications.
Unique: Integrates reasoning_effort parameter directly into standard OpenAI chat completion API without requiring separate endpoints or model variants, allowing developers to dynamically adjust reasoning depth per-request while maintaining API compatibility with existing OpenAI integrations.
vs alternatives: Maintains full backward compatibility with existing OpenAI API code while adding reasoning capabilities, eliminating migration friction compared to switching to entirely different model providers or architectures.
Balances computational cost and reasoning capability through the o3-mini architecture, which uses fewer parameters and optimized inference than o3-full while maintaining extended reasoning for STEM tasks. The high reasoning_effort setting allocates extended computation specifically to STEM reasoning patterns rather than general language understanding, reducing wasted computation on non-STEM queries. Cost is further optimized through selective reasoning — developers can use lower reasoning_effort settings for simpler queries and reserve high effort for complex problems.
Unique: Implements domain-specific parameter optimization where reasoning_effort is tuned for STEM tasks specifically, reducing computational overhead compared to general-purpose reasoning models that allocate equal reasoning budget across all domains. The o3-mini architecture itself is smaller than o3-full, enabling lower base inference costs.
vs alternatives: Provides 60-70% cost reduction vs o3-full for STEM tasks while maintaining comparable reasoning quality, making it the most cost-efficient extended-reasoning model for educational and scientific applications.
Supports multi-turn conversation history where each turn can leverage extended reasoning, maintaining conversation context across multiple exchanges. The model processes the full message history (system prompt + all previous user/assistant messages) before applying reasoning_effort to generate the next response. This enables interactive problem-solving sessions where users can ask follow-up questions, request clarifications, or build on previous reasoning steps without losing context.
Unique: Applies reasoning_effort parameter to the full conversation context rather than isolated queries, enabling reasoning to leverage previous problem-solving steps and user clarifications. This differs from stateless reasoning models that treat each request independently.
vs alternatives: Enables more natural interactive problem-solving compared to single-turn reasoning models, as users can iteratively refine solutions without losing reasoning context, though at the cost of higher per-turn token consumption.
Supports JSON mode and schema-based output constraints through OpenAI's structured output API, allowing developers to specify a JSON schema that the model must adhere to when generating responses. The model generates valid JSON that conforms to the provided schema, with built-in validation ensuring the output matches the specified structure, types, and constraints. This is particularly useful for STEM applications where structured data extraction (equations, solutions, step-by-step breakdowns) is required.
Unique: Integrates JSON schema validation directly into the reasoning loop, ensuring that extended reasoning outputs conform to specified structures without post-processing or validation layers. This differs from models that generate free-form text requiring external parsing.
vs alternatives: Eliminates the need for post-generation parsing and validation, reducing latency and error rates compared to extracting structured data from unstructured reasoning outputs.
GLM-5 processes extended code contexts (supporting multi-file projects and large codebases) while maintaining semantic understanding of system architecture through attention mechanisms optimized for code structure. The model uses specialized tokenization for programming languages and maintains coherence across thousands of tokens of code context, enabling generation of complex features that respect existing patterns and dependencies.
Unique: Engineered specifically for complex systems design with attention mechanisms tuned for code structure and architectural patterns, rather than generic language modeling — enables understanding of system-wide dependencies and design constraints across extended contexts
vs alternatives: Outperforms general-purpose models on large-scale programming tasks because it's optimized for architectural coherence and long-horizon code generation rather than treating code as generic text
GLM-5 supports extended reasoning chains for agentic workflows through structured prompt patterns that enable step-by-step decomposition of complex tasks. The model can maintain state across multiple turns, reason about tool outputs, and make decisions about next actions — designed for long-horizon agent loops where the model must plan, execute, observe, and adapt across dozens of steps.
Unique: Explicitly engineered for long-horizon agent workflows with architectural patterns optimized for extended reasoning chains, rather than single-turn tool calling — maintains coherence and decision quality across dozens of reasoning steps
vs alternatives: Better suited for multi-step agentic tasks than general-purpose models because reasoning and tool-use patterns are baked into the training, not bolted on via prompt engineering
Z.ai: GLM 5 scores higher at 24/100 vs OpenAI: o3 Mini High at 20/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
GLM-5 analyzes code for performance bottlenecks and suggests optimization strategies through understanding of algorithmic complexity, memory management, and system-level performance patterns. The model can identify inefficient algorithms, suggest data structure improvements, and recommend caching or parallelization strategies — enabling targeted performance improvements with understanding of trade-offs.
Unique: Understands algorithmic complexity and system-level performance patterns, enabling identification of fundamental bottlenecks and suggestion of targeted optimizations rather than micro-optimizations
vs alternatives: Identifies more fundamental performance issues than profiling tools because it understands algorithmic complexity and can suggest architectural improvements, not just code-level optimizations
GLM-5 generates comprehensive API specifications, including endpoint definitions, request/response schemas, error handling, and usage examples through understanding of API design best practices and REST/GraphQL patterns. The model can produce OpenAPI/Swagger specifications, generate API documentation, and suggest design improvements — enabling rapid API specification and documentation.
Unique: Generates comprehensive API specifications that follow REST/GraphQL best practices and include error handling, authentication, and usage examples — not just endpoint definitions
vs alternatives: Produces more complete and best-practice-aligned API specifications than simple code-to-spec tools because it understands API design patterns and includes comprehensive documentation
GLM-5 generates high-quality technical documentation, design documents, and architectural specifications through training on expert-level technical writing patterns. The model understands domain-specific terminology, maintains consistency across long documents, and can generate structured documentation (API specs, RFC-style documents, architecture decision records) with appropriate technical depth and precision.
Unique: Trained on expert-level technical documentation patterns and domain-specific terminology, enabling generation of publication-ready documentation with appropriate technical depth rather than generic summaries
vs alternatives: Produces more technically precise and domain-aware documentation than general-purpose models because it understands architectural patterns, trade-offs, and expert writing conventions specific to software engineering
GLM-5 breaks down complex, ambiguous problems into structured task hierarchies and implementation plans through chain-of-thought reasoning patterns. The model can identify dependencies, suggest phased approaches, and generate detailed step-by-step plans for tackling large engineering challenges — useful for translating high-level requirements into actionable development roadmaps.
Unique: Optimized for expert-level problem decomposition through training on complex system design patterns and architectural reasoning, enabling generation of sophisticated multi-phase plans rather than simple task lists
vs alternatives: Produces more sophisticated and architecturally-aware plans than general-purpose models because it understands system design patterns, dependency relationships, and phased implementation strategies
GLM-5 analyzes code for quality issues, architectural violations, and design improvements through patterns learned from expert code review practices. The model can identify performance bottlenecks, suggest refactoring opportunities, flag architectural inconsistencies, and provide detailed feedback on code quality — going beyond simple linting to understand design intent and system-wide implications.
Unique: Trained on expert code review patterns and architectural reasoning, enabling detection of design issues and architectural violations rather than just syntax and style problems
vs alternatives: Provides more sophisticated architectural and design feedback than linting tools because it understands system-wide implications and expert design patterns, not just local code quality
GLM-5 translates code between programming languages while preserving semantic meaning and adapting to language-specific idioms. The model understands language-specific patterns, libraries, and best practices, enabling translation that produces idiomatic code rather than mechanical line-by-line conversions — useful for migrating systems across language ecosystems or supporting polyglot architectures.
Unique: Produces idiomatic, language-specific code rather than mechanical translations because it understands language-specific patterns, libraries, and best practices learned from diverse codebases
vs alternatives: Generates more idiomatic and maintainable translations than simple pattern-matching tools because it understands semantic equivalence and language-specific idioms
+4 more capabilities