MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) ranks higher at 61/100 vs OpenAI: o3 Pro at 22/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | OpenAI: o3 Pro | MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Model | Dataset |
| UnfragileRank | 22/100 | 61/100 |
| Adoption | 0 |
| 1 |
| Quality | 0 | 1 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Starting Price | $2.00e-5 per prompt token | — |
| Capabilities | 8 decomposed | 11 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Implements reinforcement learning-trained reasoning that allocates variable computational budget across thinking phases before generating responses. The model uses an internal chain-of-thought mechanism where it can 'think' for extended periods (up to specified token limits) before committing to an answer, similar to o1/o3 architecture. This enables structured problem decomposition, hypothesis testing, and self-correction within a single inference pass without requiring external orchestration.
Unique: Uses RL-trained thinking mechanism that allocates compute dynamically across reasoning phases, enabling multi-path exploration and self-correction within a single forward pass. Unlike standard LLMs that generate responses directly, o3-pro separates thinking tokens from output tokens, allowing explicit control over reasoning depth via API parameters.
vs alternatives: Outperforms GPT-4 and Claude 3.5 on complex reasoning benchmarks (AIME, MATH, coding competitions) by 15-40% due to RL-optimized thinking, but costs 3-5x more per request and requires longer latency tolerance.
Accepts both text and image inputs in a single API call, processing visual content through a vision encoder that extracts semantic features before feeding them into the reasoning pipeline. The model can analyze images, diagrams, charts, and screenshots, then apply its extended reasoning capabilities to answer questions about visual content or solve problems that combine textual and visual information.
Unique: Integrates vision encoding with RL-trained reasoning, allowing the model to apply extended thinking to visual problems. Unlike GPT-4V which processes images but lacks deep reasoning, o3-pro can reason through complex visual scenarios (e.g., solving geometry problems from diagrams, debugging code from screenshots).
vs alternatives: Combines vision understanding with superior reasoning capabilities, outperforming GPT-4V on visual reasoning tasks by leveraging extended thinking, though at significantly higher latency and cost.
Supports JSON schema-based output constraints that force the model to generate responses conforming to a specified structure. The model's reasoning process is aware of the output schema, allowing it to plan solutions that fit the required format before generating. This enables reliable extraction of structured data, function arguments, or domain-specific formats without post-processing or retry logic.
Unique: Integrates schema constraints into the reasoning phase, allowing the model to plan outputs that satisfy structural requirements before generation. Unlike post-hoc JSON parsing or retry-based approaches, the model's thinking process is schema-aware, reducing hallucinations and format violations.
vs alternatives: More reliable than GPT-4's JSON mode because reasoning is schema-aware, and more efficient than Claude's tool-use approach because it doesn't require function definition overhead.
Maintains conversation history across multiple turns, with each turn's reasoning and output contributing to the model's understanding of subsequent queries. The model can reference previous reasoning steps, correct earlier conclusions, and build on prior analysis without requiring explicit context injection. Thinking tokens are computed per-turn, allowing the model to allocate reasoning budget based on conversation state.
Unique: Applies extended reasoning to each turn while maintaining conversation context, enabling the model to reference and build on previous reasoning without explicit context engineering. Unlike stateless APIs, o3-pro's reasoning is conversation-aware, allowing iterative refinement.
vs alternatives: Enables deeper reasoning across conversation turns than GPT-4 or Claude because thinking is applied per-turn, though at higher cost due to full history re-processing.
Generates code solutions by reasoning through algorithmic approaches, edge cases, and implementation details before producing output. The model can analyze existing code, identify bugs, suggest optimizations, and generate complete implementations for complex algorithms. Reasoning is applied to understand problem constraints and design decisions before code is written, reducing hallucinations and improving correctness.
Unique: Applies extended reasoning to code generation, allowing the model to think through algorithmic correctness, edge cases, and design patterns before writing code. Unlike Copilot or standard code LLMs that generate directly, o3-pro's reasoning phase enables deeper understanding of problem constraints.
vs alternatives: Outperforms Copilot and GPT-4 on competitive programming benchmarks (LeetCode, Codeforces) by 20-40% due to reasoning-guided synthesis, but is impractical for real-time code completion due to latency.
Solves mathematical problems by reasoning through problem decomposition, intermediate calculations, and solution verification. The model can handle algebra, calculus, number theory, combinatorics, and applied mathematics by explicitly working through each step. Reasoning allows the model to catch calculation errors and verify solutions before output, improving accuracy on complex multi-step problems.
Unique: Applies extended reasoning to mathematical problem-solving, enabling explicit step-by-step verification and error-checking within the reasoning phase. Unlike standard LLMs that may skip steps or make calculation errors, o3-pro's reasoning allows it to catch and correct mistakes before output.
vs alternatives: Achieves 90%+ accuracy on AIME and MATH benchmarks compared to 50-70% for GPT-4, due to reasoning-enabled verification and multi-path exploration.
Provides confidence assessments and uncertainty estimates alongside reasoning outputs, allowing the model to explicitly acknowledge when it is less certain about conclusions. The reasoning phase includes exploration of alternative interpretations and confidence in different solution paths, which can be surfaced to the user. This enables better decision-making when the model's output will be used in high-stakes contexts.
Unique: Reasoning phase explicitly explores alternative interpretations and solution paths, allowing confidence to be inferred from the breadth and consistency of reasoning. Unlike standard LLMs that output single answers, o3-pro's reasoning can surface uncertainty through exploration of alternatives.
vs alternatives: Provides better uncertainty quantification than GPT-4 or Claude because reasoning explicitly explores alternatives, though uncertainty is still qualitative rather than formally calibrated.
Exposes o3-pro through OpenAI's REST API with detailed token accounting that separates thinking tokens from output tokens. Clients can track usage in real-time, estimate costs before making requests, and optimize spending by adjusting thinking budget. The API returns detailed metadata about token consumption, allowing builders to understand the cost-benefit trade-off of extended reasoning.
Unique: Separates thinking and output tokens in billing and usage tracking, allowing fine-grained cost analysis and optimization. Unlike standard LLM APIs that bill uniformly, o3-pro's dual-token accounting enables builders to understand the cost of reasoning vs. generation.
vs alternatives: More transparent cost tracking than competitors because thinking and output tokens are separately metered, enabling better cost optimization and ROI analysis.
Provides 2.5 million manually-annotated object instances across 330,000 images with dual segmentation encoding: polygon coordinates for precise boundary definition and RLE (run-length encoding) for efficient storage and computation. Each instance includes bounding box coordinates in [x, y, width, height] format, category label from 80 object classes, and instance-level unique identifiers enabling per-object tracking and evaluation. Annotations are structured in JSON format with hierarchical organization linking images to annotations to categories, supporting both dense object scenes and sparse single-object images.
Unique: Dual segmentation encoding (polygon + RLE) in single dataset enables both precise boundary analysis and efficient computational workflows; 2.5M instances across 330K images provides scale unmatched by contemporaneous datasets (ImageNet had ~1.2M images, PASCAL VOC had ~11K images)
vs alternatives: Larger and more densely annotated than PASCAL VOC (11K images, ~6 objects/image) and more task-diverse than ImageNet (classification-only); RLE encoding enables 10-100x faster mask loading than polygon-only formats
Provides keypoint annotations for all people in images using a standardized 17-joint skeleton model (head, shoulders, elbows, wrists, hips, knees, ankles) with (x, y, visibility) tuples per joint. Visibility flag indicates whether keypoint is annotated (1), occluded (0), or outside image bounds (0). Keypoints are linked to parent person instances via instance ID, enabling pose estimation evaluation at both individual and crowd-level scales. Annotations follow COCO Keypoints task specification with consistent coordinate system across all 330K images.
Unique: Standardized 17-joint skeleton with explicit visibility flags enables robust evaluation of pose estimation under occlusion; linked to instance segmentation masks allows joint-level accuracy analysis within person bounding boxes
MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) scores higher at 61/100 vs OpenAI: o3 Pro at 22/100. MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) also has a free tier, making it more accessible.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than OpenPose dataset (no visibility flags) and larger scale than Human3.6M (3.6M frames vs 330K images); visibility annotations enable explicit occlusion handling unlike MPII (which lacks visibility metadata)
COCO ecosystem includes community-created extensions (COCO-Stuff, COCO DensePose, COCO Panoptic) that extend base dataset with additional annotations while maintaining compatibility with COCO API and evaluation infrastructure. Extensions follow COCO format and evaluation standards, enabling seamless integration into existing pipelines. Community contributions are vetted and published as official COCO variants, ensuring quality and standardization. Variant creation process is documented, enabling researchers to create custom extensions.
Unique: Standardized extension process enables community contributions while maintaining compatibility; official variants (Stuff, DensePose, Panoptic) are vetted and published, ensuring quality and discoverability
vs alternatives: More extensible than fixed datasets; community variants enable specialized use cases without forking; standardized format prevents fragmentation unlike ad-hoc dataset variants
Provides 1.65 million image-caption pairs (5 captions × 330K images) with natural language descriptions written by human annotators. Each caption is a free-form English sentence describing objects, actions, and scene context without enforced length limits or structured templates. Captions are stored in JSON format linked to image IDs, enabling training of vision-language models for image captioning, visual question answering, and cross-modal retrieval. Multiple captions per image capture linguistic diversity and alternative descriptions of the same visual content.
Unique: 5 captions per image (vs 1 in most datasets) captures linguistic diversity and enables robust evaluation of caption generation variability; 1.65M caption-image pairs provide scale for training large vision-language models
vs alternatives: 5x more captions per image than Flickr30K (1 caption/image) enabling better linguistic diversity modeling; larger scale than Visual Genome (108K images) while maintaining natural language quality vs automated alt-text
Extends base 80 object categories with 91 additional 'stuff' categories (background materials, textures, regions like sky, grass, wall) enabling dense semantic segmentation of entire images. Stuff categories are annotated as pixel-level masks without instance boundaries — all sky pixels are labeled 'sky' regardless of continuity. COCO-Stuff combines instance segmentation (80 objects) with semantic segmentation (171 total categories including stuff), stored as single-channel PNG masks where pixel value encodes category ID. Enables panoptic segmentation evaluation combining instance and stuff predictions.
Unique: 171-category taxonomy combining 80 instance objects + 91 stuff categories enables panoptic segmentation in single dataset; pixel-level masks for stuff enable dense scene understanding without instance boundaries
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than ADE20K (150 categories) and larger scale than Cityscapes (5K images); unified instance+stuff annotation enables panoptic evaluation unlike separate semantic/instance datasets
Combines instance segmentation (80 object categories with boundaries) and semantic segmentation (171 stuff categories without boundaries) into single panoptic prediction task. Evaluation uses Panoptic Quality (PQ) metric decomposed into Segmentation Quality (SQ — IoU of matched predictions) and Recognition Quality (RQ — detection rate). Panoptic masks encode both category ID and instance ID, enabling evaluation of both 'what' (category) and 'which' (instance identity) predictions. Standardized evaluation protocol with server-side metric computation ensures consistent benchmarking across submissions.
Unique: Panoptic Quality metric with explicit SQ/RQ decomposition enables fine-grained analysis of segmentation vs recognition errors; unified instance+stuff evaluation in single task forces models to handle both prediction types efficiently
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than separate instance/semantic benchmarks; PQ metric better captures real-world scene understanding than independent metrics; standardized evaluation prevents metric gaming unlike custom evaluation scripts
Provides dense 2D-to-3D correspondence maps for human bodies, mapping each pixel in a person instance to a 3D human body model surface. Annotations include UV coordinates (parameterization of 3D body surface) and body part indices enabling pixel-level body surface understanding. DensePose enables training of models that predict where each image pixel corresponds to on a canonical 3D human body, useful for pose transfer, virtual try-on, and detailed human understanding. Available from 2020 dataset version onwards, extends keypoint annotations with dense surface coverage.
Unique: Dense 2D-to-3D surface correspondence enables pixel-level body understanding beyond skeleton keypoints; UV parameterization allows transfer of appearance and shape across different people and poses
vs alternatives: More detailed than keypoint-only annotations (17 joints vs millions of surface points); enables pose transfer unlike keypoint datasets; larger scale than DensePose-specific datasets
Provides standardized evaluation metrics for each task (Average Precision for detection, IoU for segmentation, OKS for keypoints, BLEU/METEOR/CIDEr for captions, PQ for panoptic) computed server-side on held-out test set. Leaderboard system accepts structured JSON result submissions in COCO format, validates format, computes metrics, and ranks submissions by primary metric. Evaluation infrastructure ensures consistent benchmarking across all submissions and prevents metric gaming through standardized computation. Metrics are task-specific: AP/AP50/AP75 for detection, mIoU for segmentation, OKS for keypoints, CIDEr for captions.
Unique: Server-side metric computation prevents metric gaming and ensures consistency; task-specific metrics (AP, OKS, CIDEr, PQ) are standardized across all submissions enabling fair comparison; public leaderboard provides transparency and reproducibility
vs alternatives: More rigorous than self-reported metrics (prevents cherry-picking); standardized evaluation prevents metric implementation variations unlike custom evaluation scripts; public leaderboard enables community comparison unlike proprietary benchmarks
+3 more capabilities