MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) ranks higher at 61/100 vs OpenAI: o3 at 23/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | OpenAI: o3 | MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Model | Dataset |
| UnfragileRank | 23/100 | 61/100 |
| Adoption | 0 | 1 |
| Quality | 0 | 1 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Starting Price | $2.00e-6 per prompt token | — |
| Capabilities | 10 decomposed | 11 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Generates multi-step reasoning chains with extended thinking capabilities, allowing the model to work through complex problems by breaking them into intermediate reasoning steps before producing final answers. The model uses an internal reasoning process that explores multiple solution paths and validates intermediate conclusions, similar to chain-of-thought prompting but with deeper computational investment per query.
Unique: Implements internal extended thinking with computational budget allocation — the model allocates more inference compute to reasoning phases before answer generation, unlike standard LLMs that generate reasoning and answers in a single forward pass. This is achieved through a two-phase architecture where reasoning tokens are generated in a hidden reasoning phase before final output.
vs alternatives: Outperforms GPT-4 and Claude 3.5 on math olympiad problems and complex reasoning tasks by 15-40% due to extended thinking budget, but at significantly higher latency and cost than standard models
Generates, debugs, and refactors code across 40+ programming languages with the ability to analyze visual context from screenshots, diagrams, or UI mockups. The model processes both text-based code specifications and image inputs simultaneously, allowing developers to describe UI layouts visually while specifying backend logic textually, then generates coordinated code for both layers.
Unique: Integrates vision transformer architecture with code generation LLM through a unified embedding space — visual tokens from image inputs are processed through the same attention mechanisms as text tokens, enabling the model to generate code that directly references visual elements without separate vision-to-text conversion steps.
vs alternatives: Generates more contextually accurate code from visual inputs than Claude 3.5 Vision or GPT-4V because it was trained on paired code-screenshot datasets, reducing the need for iterative refinement when converting designs to implementation
Solves complex mathematical problems, scientific equations, and formal proofs using specialized reasoning patterns trained on mathematical datasets and scientific literature. The model applies domain-specific heuristics for calculus, linear algebra, physics, chemistry, and formal logic, with the ability to verify solutions through symbolic computation and dimensional analysis.
Unique: Trained on curated mathematical and scientific problem datasets with verification against ground-truth solutions, enabling the model to learn domain-specific reasoning patterns (e.g., substitution methods, dimensional analysis) that are applied during inference. This is distinct from general LLMs that treat math as pattern matching.
vs alternatives: Achieves 92% accuracy on AIME (American Invitational Mathematics Examination) problems compared to 50% for GPT-4 and 65% for Claude 3.5, demonstrating superior mathematical reasoning through specialized training and extended thinking
Generates precise technical documentation, API specifications, and instruction manuals with high fidelity to domain conventions and standards. The model understands technical writing patterns, maintains consistency across multi-document outputs, and can generate documentation that matches existing style guides or organizational standards through few-shot examples.
Unique: Trained on high-quality technical documentation corpora including official API docs, academic papers, and open-source projects, enabling the model to generate documentation that adheres to professional standards and conventions without explicit instruction. The model learns implicit formatting rules, terminology consistency, and structural patterns from training data.
vs alternatives: Produces more professionally formatted and terminology-consistent documentation than GPT-4 or Claude 3.5 because it was specifically trained on curated technical documentation datasets, reducing the need for manual editing and style corrections
Analyzes complex visual inputs including diagrams, charts, graphs, screenshots, and photographs to extract information, answer questions, and perform reasoning tasks. The model processes visual information through a vision transformer backbone integrated with the language model, enabling it to describe visual content, answer questions about images, and reason about spatial relationships and visual patterns.
Unique: Integrates a vision transformer encoder with the language model through a unified token embedding space, allowing visual tokens to be processed alongside text tokens in the same attention mechanism. This enables the model to reason about visual and textual information jointly without separate vision-to-text conversion pipelines.
vs alternatives: Outperforms GPT-4V and Claude 3.5 Vision on visual reasoning benchmarks by 10-20% due to improved vision encoder training and better integration with the language model backbone, particularly for complex multi-element diagrams and technical drawings
Follows complex, multi-part instructions with high fidelity, including nuanced constraints, edge cases, and conditional requirements. The model parses instruction hierarchies, maintains context across long instruction sets, and applies constraints consistently throughout generation, enabling it to handle instructions that require careful attention to detail and conditional logic.
Unique: Trained with reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) specifically optimized for instruction-following fidelity, using a reward model that scores outputs based on constraint adherence and instruction compliance. This enables the model to learn to prioritize instruction following over other objectives like fluency or creativity.
vs alternatives: Achieves 85-90% instruction-following accuracy on complex multi-constraint tasks compared to 70-75% for GPT-4 and Claude 3.5, due to specialized RLHF training that prioritizes constraint satisfaction and detailed instruction parsing
Analyzes buggy code, identifies root causes of errors, and generates fixes with explanations of what went wrong and why. The model uses static analysis patterns, common bug signatures, and reasoning about code execution flow to pinpoint issues, then generates corrected code with comments explaining the fix. Supports debugging across multiple languages and frameworks.
Unique: Uses extended reasoning to trace through code execution paths and identify logical inconsistencies, combined with pattern matching against known bug signatures from training data. The model generates debugging hypotheses and validates them through reasoning before proposing fixes, rather than pattern-matching to similar buggy code.
vs alternatives: Identifies root causes more accurately than GitHub Copilot or Tabnine because it uses extended reasoning to trace execution flow rather than relying on pattern matching, particularly for subtle logic errors and cross-module issues
Extracts structured information from unstructured text inputs (documents, emails, articles, etc.) and outputs data in specified formats (JSON, CSV, tables, etc.). The model parses natural language, identifies relevant information, handles missing or ambiguous data, and formats output according to schema specifications provided in prompts.
Unique: Combines natural language understanding with schema-aware output generation — the model parses text semantically to understand meaning, then maps extracted information to specified schema structures, handling type conversions and validation within the generation process.
vs alternatives: Achieves higher extraction accuracy than rule-based parsers or regex-based extraction because it understands semantic meaning and context, and handles variations in phrasing and formatting that would break traditional parsing approaches
+2 more capabilities
Provides 2.5 million manually-annotated object instances across 330,000 images with dual segmentation encoding: polygon coordinates for precise boundary definition and RLE (run-length encoding) for efficient storage and computation. Each instance includes bounding box coordinates in [x, y, width, height] format, category label from 80 object classes, and instance-level unique identifiers enabling per-object tracking and evaluation. Annotations are structured in JSON format with hierarchical organization linking images to annotations to categories, supporting both dense object scenes and sparse single-object images.
Unique: Dual segmentation encoding (polygon + RLE) in single dataset enables both precise boundary analysis and efficient computational workflows; 2.5M instances across 330K images provides scale unmatched by contemporaneous datasets (ImageNet had ~1.2M images, PASCAL VOC had ~11K images)
vs alternatives: Larger and more densely annotated than PASCAL VOC (11K images, ~6 objects/image) and more task-diverse than ImageNet (classification-only); RLE encoding enables 10-100x faster mask loading than polygon-only formats
Provides keypoint annotations for all people in images using a standardized 17-joint skeleton model (head, shoulders, elbows, wrists, hips, knees, ankles) with (x, y, visibility) tuples per joint. Visibility flag indicates whether keypoint is annotated (1), occluded (0), or outside image bounds (0). Keypoints are linked to parent person instances via instance ID, enabling pose estimation evaluation at both individual and crowd-level scales. Annotations follow COCO Keypoints task specification with consistent coordinate system across all 330K images.
Unique: Standardized 17-joint skeleton with explicit visibility flags enables robust evaluation of pose estimation under occlusion; linked to instance segmentation masks allows joint-level accuracy analysis within person bounding boxes
MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) scores higher at 61/100 vs OpenAI: o3 at 23/100. MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) also has a free tier, making it more accessible.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than OpenPose dataset (no visibility flags) and larger scale than Human3.6M (3.6M frames vs 330K images); visibility annotations enable explicit occlusion handling unlike MPII (which lacks visibility metadata)
COCO ecosystem includes community-created extensions (COCO-Stuff, COCO DensePose, COCO Panoptic) that extend base dataset with additional annotations while maintaining compatibility with COCO API and evaluation infrastructure. Extensions follow COCO format and evaluation standards, enabling seamless integration into existing pipelines. Community contributions are vetted and published as official COCO variants, ensuring quality and standardization. Variant creation process is documented, enabling researchers to create custom extensions.
Unique: Standardized extension process enables community contributions while maintaining compatibility; official variants (Stuff, DensePose, Panoptic) are vetted and published, ensuring quality and discoverability
vs alternatives: More extensible than fixed datasets; community variants enable specialized use cases without forking; standardized format prevents fragmentation unlike ad-hoc dataset variants
Provides 1.65 million image-caption pairs (5 captions × 330K images) with natural language descriptions written by human annotators. Each caption is a free-form English sentence describing objects, actions, and scene context without enforced length limits or structured templates. Captions are stored in JSON format linked to image IDs, enabling training of vision-language models for image captioning, visual question answering, and cross-modal retrieval. Multiple captions per image capture linguistic diversity and alternative descriptions of the same visual content.
Unique: 5 captions per image (vs 1 in most datasets) captures linguistic diversity and enables robust evaluation of caption generation variability; 1.65M caption-image pairs provide scale for training large vision-language models
vs alternatives: 5x more captions per image than Flickr30K (1 caption/image) enabling better linguistic diversity modeling; larger scale than Visual Genome (108K images) while maintaining natural language quality vs automated alt-text
Extends base 80 object categories with 91 additional 'stuff' categories (background materials, textures, regions like sky, grass, wall) enabling dense semantic segmentation of entire images. Stuff categories are annotated as pixel-level masks without instance boundaries — all sky pixels are labeled 'sky' regardless of continuity. COCO-Stuff combines instance segmentation (80 objects) with semantic segmentation (171 total categories including stuff), stored as single-channel PNG masks where pixel value encodes category ID. Enables panoptic segmentation evaluation combining instance and stuff predictions.
Unique: 171-category taxonomy combining 80 instance objects + 91 stuff categories enables panoptic segmentation in single dataset; pixel-level masks for stuff enable dense scene understanding without instance boundaries
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than ADE20K (150 categories) and larger scale than Cityscapes (5K images); unified instance+stuff annotation enables panoptic evaluation unlike separate semantic/instance datasets
Combines instance segmentation (80 object categories with boundaries) and semantic segmentation (171 stuff categories without boundaries) into single panoptic prediction task. Evaluation uses Panoptic Quality (PQ) metric decomposed into Segmentation Quality (SQ — IoU of matched predictions) and Recognition Quality (RQ — detection rate). Panoptic masks encode both category ID and instance ID, enabling evaluation of both 'what' (category) and 'which' (instance identity) predictions. Standardized evaluation protocol with server-side metric computation ensures consistent benchmarking across submissions.
Unique: Panoptic Quality metric with explicit SQ/RQ decomposition enables fine-grained analysis of segmentation vs recognition errors; unified instance+stuff evaluation in single task forces models to handle both prediction types efficiently
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than separate instance/semantic benchmarks; PQ metric better captures real-world scene understanding than independent metrics; standardized evaluation prevents metric gaming unlike custom evaluation scripts
Provides dense 2D-to-3D correspondence maps for human bodies, mapping each pixel in a person instance to a 3D human body model surface. Annotations include UV coordinates (parameterization of 3D body surface) and body part indices enabling pixel-level body surface understanding. DensePose enables training of models that predict where each image pixel corresponds to on a canonical 3D human body, useful for pose transfer, virtual try-on, and detailed human understanding. Available from 2020 dataset version onwards, extends keypoint annotations with dense surface coverage.
Unique: Dense 2D-to-3D surface correspondence enables pixel-level body understanding beyond skeleton keypoints; UV parameterization allows transfer of appearance and shape across different people and poses
vs alternatives: More detailed than keypoint-only annotations (17 joints vs millions of surface points); enables pose transfer unlike keypoint datasets; larger scale than DensePose-specific datasets
Provides standardized evaluation metrics for each task (Average Precision for detection, IoU for segmentation, OKS for keypoints, BLEU/METEOR/CIDEr for captions, PQ for panoptic) computed server-side on held-out test set. Leaderboard system accepts structured JSON result submissions in COCO format, validates format, computes metrics, and ranks submissions by primary metric. Evaluation infrastructure ensures consistent benchmarking across all submissions and prevents metric gaming through standardized computation. Metrics are task-specific: AP/AP50/AP75 for detection, mIoU for segmentation, OKS for keypoints, CIDEr for captions.
Unique: Server-side metric computation prevents metric gaming and ensures consistency; task-specific metrics (AP, OKS, CIDEr, PQ) are standardized across all submissions enabling fair comparison; public leaderboard provides transparency and reproducibility
vs alternatives: More rigorous than self-reported metrics (prevents cherry-picking); standardized evaluation prevents metric implementation variations unlike custom evaluation scripts; public leaderboard enables community comparison unlike proprietary benchmarks
+3 more capabilities