| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Starting Price | — | $10/mo |
| Capabilities | 6 decomposed | 13 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Accepts natural language task descriptions and directly modifies multiple files within the VS Code workspace based on semantic understanding of the project structure. The agent parses user intent, analyzes the codebase context (file relationships, imports, dependencies), and applies edits across files with awareness of cross-file impacts. Implementation approach is unknown but claims to handle 'complex project execution' suggesting AST-aware or semantic code analysis rather than regex-based replacement.
Unique: Direct file modification from natural language instructions within VS Code sidebar without requiring separate IDE or external tools; claims to maintain cross-file consistency during edits, though implementation details and safety mechanisms are undocumented
vs alternatives: Integrated directly into VS Code workflow (vs. Copilot which requires manual context switching) with claimed multi-file awareness, but lacks documented safety guarantees or rollback capabilities that traditional refactoring tools provide
Accepts high-level project goals or feature requests and breaks them into executable subtasks with sequential ordering and dependency awareness. The agent reasons about project scope, identifies prerequisites, and generates a structured plan that can be executed step-by-step. Claims 'Advanced Planning' capability but implementation approach (tree-based planning, constraint satisfaction, or LLM chain-of-thought) is undocumented.
Unique: Integrated planning agent within VS Code that generates executable plans directly tied to codebase context, rather than abstract project management — claims to understand technical feasibility based on actual code structure
vs alternatives: Tighter integration with development workflow than standalone project management tools (Jira, Linear), but lacks formal constraint modeling and team capacity planning that enterprise tools provide
Executes web searches to retrieve current information from the internet and synthesizes results into actionable context for development tasks. The agent queries search engines (provider undocumented), retrieves and parses results, and integrates findings into code generation or planning workflows. Enables developers to incorporate latest library versions, API documentation, or best practices without manual browser context switching.
Unique: Web search results are automatically synthesized into development context within VS Code chat interface, enabling seamless integration of current information into code generation without manual research workflows
vs alternatives: More integrated than manual browser searches (vs. opening Google in separate tab) but lacks transparency about search quality, source reliability, or result filtering compared to direct search engine use
Maintains context across conversation turns and learns from previous interactions to improve subsequent responses. The agent tracks user preferences, coding patterns, project-specific conventions, and successful solutions from prior tasks. Claims to 'continuously improve' by learning from interactions and web resources, suggesting some form of context accumulation or fine-tuning, though persistence mechanism and learning scope are undocumented.
Unique: Learning mechanism is claimed but entirely undocumented — unclear if using conversation history replay, embedding-based similarity, or explicit fine-tuning; no visibility into what is learned or how it affects outputs
vs alternatives: Potential for personalization beyond stateless LLM APIs (like raw OpenAI/Claude), but lack of documentation makes it impossible to assess whether learning is meaningful or marketing language
Maintains a chat interface where developers can ask questions, request code changes, or discuss architecture in natural language. The agent maintains conversation context across multiple turns, understands references to code elements, and grounds responses in the current project codebase. Conversation state is managed within the VS Code sidebar, enabling seamless context switching between chat and editing.
Unique: Chat interface is embedded directly in VS Code sidebar with implicit access to project codebase, enabling context-aware conversation without manual file selection or copy-paste of code
vs alternatives: More integrated than ChatGPT or Claude in browser (no context switching required) but likely less capable than specialized code-aware assistants like GitHub Copilot Chat due to undocumented model and context management strategy
Executes multi-step projects by orchestrating planning, file editing, web search, and code generation across multiple sequential or parallel tasks. The agent manages task dependencies, handles intermediate results, and coordinates changes across the codebase. Claims to handle 'super complex projects' but execution model (sequential, parallel, conditional branching) and error handling strategy are entirely undocumented.
Unique: Claims to orchestrate planning, search, editing, and code generation into unified project execution within VS Code, but implementation details are entirely absent from documentation
vs alternatives: Potentially more powerful than individual capabilities (Copilot for code generation, web search separately) if orchestration works as claimed, but complete lack of documentation makes it impossible to assess reliability or safety
Generates single-line and multi-line code suggestions in real-time as developers type, using semantic indexing of the entire codebase to retrieve relevant type definitions, function signatures, and contextual patterns. The system maintains a 1M token context window (Pro/Team tiers) that enables suggestions informed by distant code definitions and cross-file dependencies, constructed via local codebase semantic search rather than simple token-based recency. Suggestions adapt to detected coding style on Pro/Team tiers through implicit pattern learning from recent edits.
Unique: 1M token context window with codebase-wide semantic indexing enables suggestions informed by distant code definitions and cross-file patterns, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that typically use fixed context windows (4K-32K tokens) or file-local context. Claimed 250ms latency suggests optimized retrieval pipeline, though indexing mechanism and performance at scale remain undisclosed.
vs alternatives: Larger context window than GitHub Copilot (8K-32K tokens) and faster latency than unnamed competitors (250ms vs 783ms claimed), enabling suggestions on large codebases with minimal typing delay; trade-off is cloud dependency and undisclosed free tier limitations.
Provides a separate chat interface supporting multiple LLM backends (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4, others) for conversational code assistance. Users attach files, reference recent edits, and trigger compiler diagnostic uploads; the system generates diffs and applies code changes directly to the editor. Model selection is per-conversation, and $5/month in credits (included in Pro/Team) covers external model API costs; overage pricing is undisclosed. Hotkey-driven workflow enables rapid context switching between inline completion and chat.
Unique: Multi-model chat interface with per-conversation model selection and integrated diff application, combined with compiler diagnostic auto-upload. Unlike Copilot Chat (single model per tier) or standalone ChatGPT, Supermaven Chat unifies multiple LLM backends in a single hotkey-driven workflow with direct editor integration for change application.
Supermaven scores higher at 71/100 vs Pagetok at 29/100. Pagetok leads on ecosystem, while Supermaven is stronger on adoption and quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: Supports multiple LLM backends (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet) in one interface with included credits, whereas GitHub Copilot Chat is single-model per tier and requires separate ChatGPT subscription for model switching; trade-off is credit limits and unknown overage pricing.
Supermaven Chat can automatically upload compiler diagnostic messages (errors, warnings) alongside code context to provide error-aware suggestions and fixes. The mechanism is described as 'automatically uploading your code together with compiler diagnostic messages,' but specific language/compiler support and the upload trigger mechanism are undisclosed. This feature is Chat-only and not available in inline completion.
Unique: Automatic compiler diagnostic upload in Chat for error-aware suggestions, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that require manual error context or have limited diagnostic integration. Supermaven's approach reduces friction but with undisclosed language/compiler support.
vs alternatives: Automatic diagnostic upload reduces manual context-gathering compared to manual copy-paste; trade-off is undisclosed language support and unclear upload trigger mechanism.
Supermaven offers a 30-day free trial of the Pro tier ($10/month), providing full access to 1M token context window, largest model, style adaptation, and $5/month chat credits. No credit card is required to start the trial (implied), and trial conversion to paid is automatic after 30 days unless cancelled. Trial terms and auto-renewal policy are not explicitly detailed.
Unique: 30-day free trial of Pro tier with full feature access (1M context, largest model, chat credits), versus competitors (Copilot 2-month free trial, Tabnine free tier only) with different trial lengths and feature access. Supermaven's approach is generous but with undisclosed auto-renewal terms.
vs alternatives: Full Pro feature access during trial compared to limited free tier; trade-off is undisclosed auto-renewal policy and potential unexpected charges if not cancelled.
Supermaven requires internet connectivity and server-side inference; no offline mode or local inference capability is mentioned or available. All code completion requests are sent to Supermaven's backend servers for processing, and responses are returned over the network. This creates a hard dependency on network connectivity and Supermaven's service availability; if the service is down or network is unavailable, code completion is not available.
Unique: Supermaven has no offline mode or local inference capability; all processing is server-side. GitHub Copilot also requires server-side inference, but Tabnine offers local inference options for some use cases. Supermaven's lack of offline capability is a significant limitation for developers with connectivity constraints.
vs alternatives: Supermaven's server-side-only approach is comparable to GitHub Copilot; Tabnine offers local inference options, making Tabnine more suitable for offline work. Supermaven's lack of offline capability is a weakness vs. Tabnine.
Analyzes recent code edits and inferred coding patterns to adapt inline suggestions to match team conventions, naming patterns, and structural preferences. The mechanism is implicit (not explicit fine-tuning) and operates only on Pro/Team tiers, suggesting pattern learning from editor activity rather than explicit configuration. Free tier uses a single base model without personalization.
Unique: Implicit style adaptation via editor activity analysis without explicit configuration, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that require manual style guides or explicit fine-tuning. Supermaven's approach is transparent to the user but also non-configurable and undisclosed in mechanism.
vs alternatives: Requires no manual style configuration compared to tools requiring explicit style guides; trade-off is lack of transparency and inability to control or export learned styles.
Delivers code suggestions to the editor inline as the developer types, with a claimed baseline latency of 250ms from keystroke to suggestion display. The system uses a cloud inference backend and local editor plugin to minimize round-trip time. Latency claim is positioned against an unnamed competitor (783ms), but methodology is undisclosed and no independent verification is provided.
Unique: Claimed 250ms latency via optimized cloud inference pipeline and editor plugin architecture, versus competitors with higher latency (783ms unnamed baseline). Actual differentiation is undisclosed; mechanism may involve request batching, model quantization, or edge caching, but specifics are not public.
vs alternatives: Faster than unnamed competitor (250ms vs 783ms claimed); trade-off is cloud dependency and unverified latency claim with no SLA or performance guarantee.
Provides native editor extensions for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs (IntelliJ IDEA, PyCharm, WebStorm, etc.), and Neovim, enabling inline suggestion rendering, hotkey-driven chat access, and compiler diagnostic integration directly within the editor. Each plugin variant is maintained separately and integrates with the editor's native autocomplete UI, keybinding system, and file context APIs.
Unique: Native plugins for three major editor ecosystems (VS Code, JetBrains, Neovim) with integrated chat and diff application, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that support broader editor ecosystems but with less deep integration in some cases. Supermaven's approach prioritizes depth over breadth.
vs alternatives: Deep integration with VS Code and JetBrains (native autocomplete UI, hotkey system) compared to web-based tools or lighter integrations; trade-off is limited editor support (no Sublime, Vim, Emacs) and undisclosed Neovim support details.
+5 more capabilities