| Ecosystem |
| 1 |
| 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 12 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Orchestrates teams of AI agents through a command-line interface, enabling agents to be spawned, coordinated, and managed as autonomous workers. Uses a task-queue-based architecture where agents receive work items, execute them independently, and report results back to a central coordinator. Agents can communicate with each other through a message-passing system to handle interdependent tasks.
Unique: Provides CLI-first orchestration for agent teams rather than API-only or UI-only approaches, enabling scriptable, reproducible agent workflows that integrate directly into existing DevOps and automation pipelines
vs alternatives: Simpler to deploy and script than web-based agent platforms, with lower operational overhead than cloud-managed agent services
Allows developers to define specialized agent roles with specific system prompts, capabilities, and behavioral constraints. Each agent role is configured with a unique persona, set of allowed tools, and decision-making parameters. The system enforces role boundaries so agents stay within their domain of responsibility and cannot exceed their defined capabilities.
Unique: Implements role-based agent specialization through configuration-driven persona assignment rather than relying solely on prompt engineering, enabling reproducible and auditable agent behavior across team deployments
vs alternatives: More structured than ad-hoc prompt-based agent creation, providing clearer boundaries and easier role auditing than monolithic single-agent systems
Provides built-in error handling mechanisms including automatic retries with exponential backoff, circuit breakers for failing services, and fallback agents when primary agents fail. Implements timeout handling to prevent agents from hanging indefinitely. Supports custom error handlers that can implement domain-specific recovery logic. Errors are logged with full context for debugging.
Unique: Implements resilience patterns at the agent orchestration level rather than relying on individual agents to handle errors, enabling consistent error handling across all agents
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than agent-level error handling, providing system-wide resilience patterns that work consistently across heterogeneous agent implementations
Enables version control of agent configurations, allowing teams to track changes, rollback to previous versions, and compare configurations across versions. Configurations include agent prompts, tool bindings, role definitions, and execution parameters. Supports configuration templates for creating similar agents with minimal duplication. Enables environment-specific configurations (dev, staging, production).
Unique: Treats agent configurations as first-class versioned artifacts rather than runtime parameters, enabling reproducible agent deployments and clear audit trails of configuration changes
vs alternatives: More structured than ad-hoc configuration management, providing clear version history and rollback capabilities similar to infrastructure-as-code practices
Provides a registry system for binding external tools and APIs to agents, enabling them to take actions beyond text generation. Tools are registered with schemas defining inputs, outputs, and execution logic. Agents can discover available tools, invoke them with appropriate parameters, and handle results. Supports both synchronous and asynchronous tool execution with error handling and retry logic.
Unique: Implements tool binding through a declarative schema registry that agents can introspect at runtime, enabling dynamic tool discovery and composition without hardcoding tool references into agent logic
vs alternatives: More flexible than fixed tool sets, allowing runtime tool registration and discovery similar to OpenAI function calling but with local execution control
Enables agents to send and receive messages from other agents in the team, facilitating coordination on complex tasks. Messages are routed through a central message broker that handles delivery, ordering, and acknowledgment. Agents can subscribe to message types and react to incoming messages, enabling event-driven workflows where one agent's output triggers another agent's action.
Unique: Implements agent-to-agent communication through a message broker pattern rather than direct API calls, decoupling agent dependencies and enabling asynchronous coordination without tight coupling
vs alternatives: More scalable than direct agent-to-agent calls, reducing coupling and enabling easier addition of new agents to existing workflows
Manages a task queue where work items are submitted and distributed to available agents for execution. Tasks are enqueued with metadata (priority, deadline, dependencies) and assigned to agents based on availability and capability matching. The queue system tracks task status, handles retries for failed tasks, and provides visibility into queue depth and agent utilization.
Unique: Implements a lightweight in-memory task queue with agent capability matching, enabling simple but effective work distribution without requiring external queue infrastructure like RabbitMQ or SQS
vs alternatives: Simpler to deploy than external queue systems for small to medium workloads, with built-in agent awareness rather than generic job queues
Provides real-time monitoring of agent execution with detailed logging of actions, decisions, and outcomes. Each agent execution generates logs capturing the agent's reasoning process, tool calls, and results. Logs are structured and queryable, enabling debugging and auditing of agent behavior. Includes metrics collection for performance analysis and error tracking.
Unique: Captures execution logs at the agent level with full reasoning traces rather than just API call logs, enabling deep visibility into agent decision-making and behavior patterns
vs alternatives: More detailed than generic application logging, providing agent-specific insights into reasoning and decision paths that are crucial for debugging autonomous systems
+4 more capabilities
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
Supabase scores higher at 42/100 vs paperclipai at 31/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities