MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) ranks higher at 61/100 vs Patterned AI at 43/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | Patterned AI | MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Product | Dataset |
| UnfragileRank | 43/100 | 61/100 |
| Adoption | 0 | 1 |
| Quality |
| 1 |
| 1 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 8 decomposed | 11 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Automatically identifies recurring patterns, clusters, and anomalies in structured data without requiring labeled training data or manual feature engineering. Uses machine learning algorithms (likely clustering, dimensionality reduction, or statistical anomaly detection) to surface hidden relationships across multiple dimensions simultaneously, then ranks patterns by statistical significance and actionability for design decision-making.
Unique: Designed specifically for design-driven pattern discovery rather than general data science — patterns are ranked by actionability for design decisions (e.g., user behavior segments that inform persona creation) rather than pure statistical significance
vs alternatives: More accessible than raw ML libraries (scikit-learn, TensorFlow) for designers without Python expertise, but less flexible than custom ML pipelines for domain-specific pattern definitions
Transforms detected patterns into interactive visual representations (likely scatter plots, heatmaps, network graphs, or parallel coordinates) optimized for design decision-making rather than statistical reporting. Visualization engine allows filtering, drilling down into pattern subsets, and comparing pattern characteristics side-by-side to extract actionable design insights.
Unique: Visualization layouts are optimized for design decision-making (e.g., persona-centric views, behavior journey maps) rather than statistical analysis — includes built-in annotations and insight extraction tools tailored to design workflows
vs alternatives: More intuitive for designers than generic BI tools (Tableau, Power BI) which require SQL/data modeling expertise; more design-focused than academic visualization libraries (Plotly, Altair)
Automatically synthesizes detected patterns into actionable persona definitions and user segment descriptions by identifying common behavioral traits, preferences, and characteristics within each cluster. Generates natural language summaries of each pattern (e.g., 'power users who prioritize speed over customization') and maps patterns to design implications, enabling designers to move directly from data to persona-informed design decisions.
Unique: Bridges the gap between statistical clustering and design practice by automatically generating design-actionable persona narratives rather than leaving interpretation to designers — includes built-in design implication mapping
vs alternatives: Faster than manual persona synthesis from raw data, but less flexible than custom persona frameworks; more data-driven than assumption-based personas, but less nuanced than ethnographic research
Identifies evolving patterns and trends in time-series or sequential data by analyzing how user behaviors, preferences, or characteristics change over time periods. Detects trend acceleration, seasonal cycles, and inflection points that signal shifts in user needs or design preferences, enabling designers to anticipate future design requirements and identify windows for design iteration.
Unique: Temporal pattern detection is framed around design decision windows (e.g., 'user engagement is accelerating — design refresh needed within 2 months') rather than pure forecasting — includes design implication timing
vs alternatives: More accessible than time-series ML libraries (Prophet, ARIMA) for non-data-scientists; more design-focused than general forecasting tools
Enables comparison of patterns detected across multiple datasets or time periods to identify correlations between user segments and design outcomes, or to track how patterns evolve across product versions. Uses statistical correlation analysis to determine whether pattern characteristics in one dataset predict or correlate with outcomes in another, supporting hypothesis testing and design validation.
Unique: Correlation analysis is framed around design validation (e.g., 'does this user segment respond better to minimalist design?') rather than general statistical analysis — includes design-specific hypothesis templates
vs alternatives: More accessible than statistical software (R, SPSS) for designers; more design-focused than general correlation tools
Automatically generates design recommendations based on detected patterns by mapping pattern characteristics to design principles, interaction patterns, and feature priorities. Uses pattern metadata (size, distinctiveness, behavioral traits) to suggest design changes, feature prioritization, and interaction design approaches tailored to each user segment, bridging the gap between data insights and actionable design decisions.
Unique: Automatically translates statistical patterns into design-actionable recommendations using a pattern-to-design mapping engine, rather than requiring designers to manually interpret data — includes segment-specific design direction
vs alternatives: More automated than manual design synthesis from data, but less customizable than bespoke design strategy workshops; bridges data and design without requiring data science expertise
Provides access to core pattern detection and visualization capabilities on a free tier with restricted export functionality — users can detect patterns, visualize them interactively, and view insights within the platform, but cannot export high-resolution visualizations, raw pattern data, or integrate with external design tools without upgrading to paid plans. Freemium model enables experimentation and validation before committing to paid features.
Unique: Freemium model removes barriers to entry for individual designers and small teams, but export restrictions create friction for integration with existing design workflows — intentional design to encourage upgrade to paid tiers
vs alternatives: More accessible entry point than paid-only analytics tools, but more restrictive than open-source ML libraries; balances accessibility with monetization
On paid tiers, enables export of pattern insights and visualizations to popular design tools (Figma, Adobe XD) and supports API-based integration for embedding pattern detection into design workflows. Allows designers to reference pattern-based personas, segment definitions, and design recommendations directly within design files, and enables automated pattern detection as part of design iteration cycles.
Unique: Bridges pattern detection and design tool workflows by enabling direct export to Figma/Adobe XD, reducing friction between data insights and design implementation — paid-tier feature creates upgrade incentive
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic data export, but less flexible than custom API implementations; supports major design tools but excludes emerging platforms
Provides 2.5 million manually-annotated object instances across 330,000 images with dual segmentation encoding: polygon coordinates for precise boundary definition and RLE (run-length encoding) for efficient storage and computation. Each instance includes bounding box coordinates in [x, y, width, height] format, category label from 80 object classes, and instance-level unique identifiers enabling per-object tracking and evaluation. Annotations are structured in JSON format with hierarchical organization linking images to annotations to categories, supporting both dense object scenes and sparse single-object images.
Unique: Dual segmentation encoding (polygon + RLE) in single dataset enables both precise boundary analysis and efficient computational workflows; 2.5M instances across 330K images provides scale unmatched by contemporaneous datasets (ImageNet had ~1.2M images, PASCAL VOC had ~11K images)
vs alternatives: Larger and more densely annotated than PASCAL VOC (11K images, ~6 objects/image) and more task-diverse than ImageNet (classification-only); RLE encoding enables 10-100x faster mask loading than polygon-only formats
Provides keypoint annotations for all people in images using a standardized 17-joint skeleton model (head, shoulders, elbows, wrists, hips, knees, ankles) with (x, y, visibility) tuples per joint. Visibility flag indicates whether keypoint is annotated (1), occluded (0), or outside image bounds (0). Keypoints are linked to parent person instances via instance ID, enabling pose estimation evaluation at both individual and crowd-level scales. Annotations follow COCO Keypoints task specification with consistent coordinate system across all 330K images.
Unique: Standardized 17-joint skeleton with explicit visibility flags enables robust evaluation of pose estimation under occlusion; linked to instance segmentation masks allows joint-level accuracy analysis within person bounding boxes
MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) scores higher at 61/100 vs Patterned AI at 43/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than OpenPose dataset (no visibility flags) and larger scale than Human3.6M (3.6M frames vs 330K images); visibility annotations enable explicit occlusion handling unlike MPII (which lacks visibility metadata)
COCO ecosystem includes community-created extensions (COCO-Stuff, COCO DensePose, COCO Panoptic) that extend base dataset with additional annotations while maintaining compatibility with COCO API and evaluation infrastructure. Extensions follow COCO format and evaluation standards, enabling seamless integration into existing pipelines. Community contributions are vetted and published as official COCO variants, ensuring quality and standardization. Variant creation process is documented, enabling researchers to create custom extensions.
Unique: Standardized extension process enables community contributions while maintaining compatibility; official variants (Stuff, DensePose, Panoptic) are vetted and published, ensuring quality and discoverability
vs alternatives: More extensible than fixed datasets; community variants enable specialized use cases without forking; standardized format prevents fragmentation unlike ad-hoc dataset variants
Provides 1.65 million image-caption pairs (5 captions × 330K images) with natural language descriptions written by human annotators. Each caption is a free-form English sentence describing objects, actions, and scene context without enforced length limits or structured templates. Captions are stored in JSON format linked to image IDs, enabling training of vision-language models for image captioning, visual question answering, and cross-modal retrieval. Multiple captions per image capture linguistic diversity and alternative descriptions of the same visual content.
Unique: 5 captions per image (vs 1 in most datasets) captures linguistic diversity and enables robust evaluation of caption generation variability; 1.65M caption-image pairs provide scale for training large vision-language models
vs alternatives: 5x more captions per image than Flickr30K (1 caption/image) enabling better linguistic diversity modeling; larger scale than Visual Genome (108K images) while maintaining natural language quality vs automated alt-text
Extends base 80 object categories with 91 additional 'stuff' categories (background materials, textures, regions like sky, grass, wall) enabling dense semantic segmentation of entire images. Stuff categories are annotated as pixel-level masks without instance boundaries — all sky pixels are labeled 'sky' regardless of continuity. COCO-Stuff combines instance segmentation (80 objects) with semantic segmentation (171 total categories including stuff), stored as single-channel PNG masks where pixel value encodes category ID. Enables panoptic segmentation evaluation combining instance and stuff predictions.
Unique: 171-category taxonomy combining 80 instance objects + 91 stuff categories enables panoptic segmentation in single dataset; pixel-level masks for stuff enable dense scene understanding without instance boundaries
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than ADE20K (150 categories) and larger scale than Cityscapes (5K images); unified instance+stuff annotation enables panoptic evaluation unlike separate semantic/instance datasets
Combines instance segmentation (80 object categories with boundaries) and semantic segmentation (171 stuff categories without boundaries) into single panoptic prediction task. Evaluation uses Panoptic Quality (PQ) metric decomposed into Segmentation Quality (SQ — IoU of matched predictions) and Recognition Quality (RQ — detection rate). Panoptic masks encode both category ID and instance ID, enabling evaluation of both 'what' (category) and 'which' (instance identity) predictions. Standardized evaluation protocol with server-side metric computation ensures consistent benchmarking across submissions.
Unique: Panoptic Quality metric with explicit SQ/RQ decomposition enables fine-grained analysis of segmentation vs recognition errors; unified instance+stuff evaluation in single task forces models to handle both prediction types efficiently
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than separate instance/semantic benchmarks; PQ metric better captures real-world scene understanding than independent metrics; standardized evaluation prevents metric gaming unlike custom evaluation scripts
Provides dense 2D-to-3D correspondence maps for human bodies, mapping each pixel in a person instance to a 3D human body model surface. Annotations include UV coordinates (parameterization of 3D body surface) and body part indices enabling pixel-level body surface understanding. DensePose enables training of models that predict where each image pixel corresponds to on a canonical 3D human body, useful for pose transfer, virtual try-on, and detailed human understanding. Available from 2020 dataset version onwards, extends keypoint annotations with dense surface coverage.
Unique: Dense 2D-to-3D surface correspondence enables pixel-level body understanding beyond skeleton keypoints; UV parameterization allows transfer of appearance and shape across different people and poses
vs alternatives: More detailed than keypoint-only annotations (17 joints vs millions of surface points); enables pose transfer unlike keypoint datasets; larger scale than DensePose-specific datasets
Provides standardized evaluation metrics for each task (Average Precision for detection, IoU for segmentation, OKS for keypoints, BLEU/METEOR/CIDEr for captions, PQ for panoptic) computed server-side on held-out test set. Leaderboard system accepts structured JSON result submissions in COCO format, validates format, computes metrics, and ranks submissions by primary metric. Evaluation infrastructure ensures consistent benchmarking across all submissions and prevents metric gaming through standardized computation. Metrics are task-specific: AP/AP50/AP75 for detection, mIoU for segmentation, OKS for keypoints, CIDEr for captions.
Unique: Server-side metric computation prevents metric gaming and ensures consistency; task-specific metrics (AP, OKS, CIDEr, PQ) are standardized across all submissions enabling fair comparison; public leaderboard provides transparency and reproducibility
vs alternatives: More rigorous than self-reported metrics (prevents cherry-picking); standardized evaluation prevents metric implementation variations unlike custom evaluation scripts; public leaderboard enables community comparison unlike proprietary benchmarks
+3 more capabilities