| 0 |
| 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 12 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Enables inference on large language models by distributing computation across a peer-to-peer network using BitTorrent-style protocols. Each peer runs a subset of model layers, and inference requests are routed through the network with automatic layer assignment and load balancing. Uses a DHT (Distributed Hash Table) for peer discovery and maintains connection pools to optimize throughput across heterogeneous hardware.
Unique: Uses BitTorrent-style swarm protocols for model layer distribution rather than traditional client-server or parameter-server architectures, enabling truly decentralized inference without a central coordinator. Implements adaptive layer assignment based on peer bandwidth and VRAM availability, allowing heterogeneous hardware to participate efficiently.
vs alternatives: Eliminates dependency on centralized inference providers (OpenAI, Anthropic) by distributing computation across a peer network, reducing per-inference costs to near-zero for participants while maintaining latency comparable to local inference for models that fit in VRAM.
Dynamically assigns model layers to available peers based on real-time metrics including peer bandwidth, GPU utilization, latency, and VRAM availability. Uses a greedy routing algorithm that selects the optimal peer for each layer during inference, with fallback mechanisms for peer unavailability. Maintains a peer registry with periodic health checks and bandwidth estimation via probe requests.
Unique: Implements layer-level routing rather than request-level routing, allowing a single inference to span multiple peers with different characteristics. Uses bandwidth probing and latency measurement to make routing decisions in real-time without requiring explicit peer capacity declarations.
vs alternatives: More granular than traditional load balancers that assign entire requests to single servers; enables efficient use of heterogeneous hardware by matching layer characteristics to peer capabilities.
Provides client libraries (Python, JavaScript) that handle inference orchestration, including prompt tokenization, layer routing, result decoding, and error handling. Manages inference context including conversation history, system prompts, and generation parameters. Implements client-side caching of tokenized prompts to avoid re-tokenization. Abstracts away network complexity, presenting a simple API similar to standard LLM inference libraries.
Unique: Provides high-level client APIs that abstract distributed inference complexity while maintaining low-level control for advanced use cases. Includes built-in context management for multi-turn interactions.
vs alternatives: Simpler to use than raw peer APIs by providing familiar LLM inference interfaces; more flexible than cloud APIs by allowing local context management.
Supports any transformer-based model that can be split into layers, regardless of architecture (BERT, GPT, LLaMA, Mistral, etc.). Automatically detects model structure and layer boundaries from HuggingFace model configs. Handles different layer types (attention, feed-forward, embedding) transparently. Includes compatibility layer for models with non-standard architectures or custom layers. Supports both encoder-only and decoder-only models.
Unique: Implements automatic layer detection and distribution for any transformer model without requiring model-specific code. Supports heterogeneous model families in the same network.
vs alternatives: More flexible than model-specific frameworks by supporting any transformer architecture; more maintainable than manual layer definitions by auto-detecting from model configs.
Caches model layers locally on peers to avoid re-downloading them for subsequent inferences. Implements LRU (Least Recently Used) eviction policy with configurable cache size based on available VRAM. Prefetches layers before inference begins based on predicted request patterns, reducing latency for common model paths. Uses content-addressable storage (hashing) to verify layer integrity and enable deduplication across peers.
Unique: Implements layer-level caching with content-addressable storage, allowing peers to deduplicate layers across different models and versions. Combines LRU eviction with prefetching heuristics to optimize for both hit rate and latency.
vs alternatives: More efficient than downloading entire models on-demand by caching individual layers; enables participation from peers with limited storage by using intelligent eviction policies.
Automatically selects appropriate numerical precision (FP32, FP16, INT8) for each layer based on peer hardware capabilities and model requirements. Handles mixed-precision inference where different layers run at different precisions on different peers. Includes quantization support for reducing VRAM requirements on resource-constrained peers. Detects hardware capabilities (GPU type, compute capability, available VRAM) and adapts layer execution accordingly.
Unique: Implements layer-level precision selection with automatic detection of hardware capabilities, allowing a single inference to use different precisions on different peers. Includes built-in quantization support without requiring pre-quantized models.
vs alternatives: Enables broader hardware participation than frameworks requiring uniform precision; more flexible than static quantization by adapting to available hardware at inference time.
Uses a Distributed Hash Table (DHT) similar to BitTorrent to discover peers offering specific model layers without requiring a central server. Peers register themselves in the DHT with their available layers, VRAM, and bandwidth. Clients query the DHT to find peers capable of serving requested layers. Includes bootstrap node mechanism for initial network entry and fallback peer lists for network resilience.
Unique: Implements a DHT specifically optimized for model layer discovery, allowing peers to register and query based on layer identifiers rather than generic key-value pairs. Includes fallback mechanisms for bootstrap resilience.
vs alternatives: Eliminates central registry dependency compared to traditional client-server architectures; more resilient to single points of failure than static peer lists.
Streams generated tokens back to the client as they're produced rather than waiting for full sequence completion. Implements early stopping mechanisms allowing clients to terminate generation mid-sequence if desired (e.g., when reaching a stop token or max length). Uses token-by-token routing where each generated token is fed back through the network for the next iteration, with caching of intermediate states to reduce redundant computation.
Unique: Implements token-by-token routing through the peer network, allowing each generated token to be fed back for the next iteration. Combines streaming with early stopping to optimize for both latency and user experience.
vs alternatives: More responsive than batch inference by streaming tokens in real-time; enables early stopping to reduce computation compared to generating full sequences.
+4 more capabilities
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
Supabase scores higher at 42/100 vs Petals at 22/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities