| 0 |
| 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Capabilities | 6 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Maintains a curated, searchable registry of MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers with metadata including descriptions, capabilities, authors, and integration requirements. The system aggregates server information from community submissions and GitHub sources, indexing them for semantic and keyword-based discovery through a web interface and API endpoints.
Unique: Purpose-built registry specifically for MCP servers rather than generic tool discovery — understands MCP-specific metadata like protocol version, supported resource types, and sampling parameters
vs alternatives: More focused and MCP-aware than generic GitHub search or tool aggregators, providing curated discovery specifically for the MCP ecosystem
Automatically aggregates and curates MCP-related news, server releases, articles, and community discussions into a weekly newsletter format. The system monitors GitHub releases, community forums, and submitted content to identify noteworthy updates, then synthesizes them into digestible weekly summaries distributed via email and web publication.
Unique: Specialized newsletter focused exclusively on MCP ecosystem rather than general AI/LLM news — understands MCP-specific terminology, protocol changes, and server categories
vs alternatives: More targeted than general AI newsletters and more comprehensive than following individual GitHub repos, providing weekly synthesis of the entire MCP ecosystem in one place
Provides a submission workflow allowing developers to contribute new MCP servers to the registry with automated or semi-automated validation of metadata completeness, GitHub repository validity, and basic capability descriptions. The system validates that submitted servers meet minimum documentation standards before adding them to the public catalog.
Unique: Streamlined submission workflow designed specifically for MCP servers with validation rules tailored to MCP metadata requirements rather than generic tool submission
vs alternatives: Lower friction than submitting to generic tool directories and more discoverable than publishing a server on GitHub alone
Exposes a REST API allowing programmatic access to the MCP server registry, enabling applications to query servers by category, capability, author, or keyword and retrieve structured metadata. The API supports filtering, pagination, and sorting to enable integration of MCP discovery into external tools, dashboards, or agent frameworks.
Unique: Purpose-built API for MCP ecosystem discovery rather than generic registry API — understands MCP-specific query patterns like filtering by protocol version or resource type support
vs alternatives: Enables programmatic discovery of MCP servers without scraping or manual GitHub searches, allowing dynamic integration selection in agent systems
Implements a hierarchical categorization and tagging system that organizes MCP servers by function (e.g., data access, code execution, external APIs) and use case. The system enables multi-dimensional filtering and discovery, allowing users to find servers relevant to specific problem domains or integration patterns.
Unique: MCP-specific categorization scheme designed around server capabilities and integration patterns rather than generic tool categories
vs alternatives: More granular and use-case-aware than simple GitHub topic tags, enabling discovery based on functional requirements rather than just server name or description
Aggregates community feedback, discussions, and user experiences for each MCP server, potentially including GitHub issues, discussions, or dedicated comment threads. The system surfaces common use cases, known limitations, and implementation patterns shared by the community, providing social proof and practical guidance for server adoption.
Unique: Centralizes MCP server feedback in one place rather than scattered across GitHub repos and forums — provides unified view of community experience
vs alternatives: More accessible than hunting through GitHub issues individually, providing curated community insights alongside server metadata
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
Supabase scores higher at 42/100 vs PulseMCP at 22/100. PulseMCP leads on quality, while Supabase is stronger on ecosystem. Supabase also has a free tier, making it more accessible.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities