| 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 11 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Maintains a canonical, curated registry of 200+ MCP server implementations organized across 30+ functional categories with standardized metadata (GitHub links, language indicators, deployment scope, platform support). Developers query this registry to locate servers matching specific use cases, with visual navigation via emoji-based category indexing and consistent entry formatting enabling programmatic discovery.
Unique: Serves as the canonical, community-curated MCP server registry with 85K+ GitHub stars, using a single-source-of-truth README.md architecture that organizes 200+ servers across 30+ categories with standardized metadata formatting (language icons, scope indicators, platform support) enabling visual discovery without requiring a separate database or API backend.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive and actively maintained than fragmented server lists; provides standardized metadata format and category taxonomy that enables consistent discovery across the entire MCP ecosystem, whereas individual server repositories lack cross-ecosystem visibility.
Implements a hierarchical categorization system spanning 30+ functional categories (Aggregators, Data Access, Automation, Integration, Intelligence, Domain-Specific) with emoji-based visual markers and nested subcategories. Each server entry includes language icons (TypeScript, Python, Go), deployment scope indicators (Cloud, Local, Embedded), and platform support (macOS, Windows, Linux), enabling multi-dimensional filtering and discovery.
Unique: Uses a multi-dimensional tagging system combining functional categories (30+), language icons (TypeScript/Python/Go), deployment scope (Cloud/Local/Embedded), and platform indicators (macOS/Windows/Linux) in a single README entry format, enabling visual discovery without requiring database queries or API calls.
vs alternatives: Simpler and more accessible than database-backed server registries; emoji-based visual markers enable quick scanning and filtering without requiring programmatic API knowledge, making it suitable for both technical and non-technical users exploring the MCP ecosystem.
Documents the communication flow between AI models, MCP clients, and MCP servers, including request routing patterns, context passing mechanisms, and response aggregation. Explains how AI models invoke tools through MCP clients, how clients route requests to appropriate servers, and how responses are aggregated back to models, with architectural diagrams showing information flow across the three-tier architecture.
Unique: Documents MCP communication flow as a first-class architectural concern with diagrams showing three-tier interaction patterns, rather than treating communication as an implementation detail of individual frameworks.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than individual framework documentation; provides cross-framework communication patterns that enable developers to understand MCP semantics independent of specific client or server implementations.
Provides comprehensive documentation of the Model Context Protocol's three-tier architecture, communication flow patterns, transport mechanisms (stdio, SSE, HTTP), and the aggregator consolidation pattern. Serves as the authoritative reference for understanding how MCP enables AI models to securely interact with external resources through standardized server implementations, with detailed diagrams and architectural patterns.
Unique: Consolidates MCP protocol architecture documentation in a single curated repository with high-level diagrams showing three-tier architecture, communication flow, transport mechanisms, and aggregator patterns, serving as the canonical reference for protocol understanding without requiring consultation of fragmented specification documents.
vs alternatives: More accessible than raw protocol specifications; provides visual architectural diagrams and conceptual explanations alongside server registry, enabling developers to understand both protocol design and available implementations in a single resource.
Documents the aggregator pattern for consolidating multiple MCP servers into a unified interface, enabling AI models to access diverse capabilities through a single server endpoint. Explains how aggregators abstract away complexity of managing multiple server connections, handle request routing, and provide unified context to AI models, with examples of aggregator implementations in the registry.
Unique: Explicitly documents the aggregator pattern as a first-class MCP architectural pattern, showing how multiple specialized servers can be consolidated into a single unified interface with request routing and context aggregation, rather than treating aggregation as an ad-hoc implementation detail.
vs alternatives: Provides architectural guidance on aggregator design patterns specific to MCP ecosystem, whereas generic API gateway or service mesh documentation lacks MCP-specific context aggregation and tool capability consolidation semantics.
Enforces consistent metadata formatting across all 200+ server entries using standardized fields: server name, GitHub repository link, programming language icon, deployment scope indicator, platform support icons, and functional description. Enables programmatic parsing and validation of server entries, supporting automated registry analysis and server discovery tooling without requiring manual data extraction.
Unique: Implements a consistent metadata schema across 200+ server entries using emoji-based visual indicators and structured markdown formatting, enabling programmatic extraction and validation without requiring a separate database or API, while maintaining human readability.
vs alternatives: More accessible than database-backed registries for contributors; standardized markdown format enables community contributions without database access, while emoji-based indicators provide visual consistency that aids human discovery alongside programmatic parsing.
Catalogs 200+ MCP servers across 30+ functional categories spanning data access (databases, file systems, data platforms), automation (browser, CLI, code execution), integration (cloud platforms, communication), intelligence (knowledge, search, monitoring), and domain-specific areas (finance, biology, legal, gaming). Enables analysis of ecosystem maturity, identifies underserved categories, and reveals implementation language distribution and platform support coverage.
Unique: Provides a comprehensive, categorized view of the entire MCP server ecosystem with 200+ implementations across 30+ functional categories, enabling systematic analysis of coverage, gaps, and maturity without requiring consultation of individual server repositories or ecosystem surveys.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than individual server documentation; enables cross-ecosystem analysis and gap identification that individual repositories cannot provide, while maintaining community-driven curation model that scales better than proprietary registries.
Catalogs MCP frameworks, utilities, and client libraries that enable developers to build MCP servers and integrate MCP clients into AI applications. Includes framework recommendations for different programming languages (TypeScript, Python, Go), utility libraries for common patterns (logging, error handling, schema validation), and client integration examples for popular AI platforms, reducing implementation friction and standardizing server development practices.
Unique: Consolidates MCP framework and utility recommendations in a single registry, enabling developers to discover implementation tools alongside server implementations, rather than requiring separate searches across framework documentation and GitHub repositories.
vs alternatives: More discoverable than scattered framework documentation; provides a curated list of MCP-specific frameworks and utilities in one place, whereas developers typically must search individual framework repositories or rely on community recommendations.
+3 more capabilities
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
awesome-mcp-servers scores higher at 49/100 vs Supabase at 42/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities