| Ecosystem |
| 1 |
| 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 14 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Provides structured logging via logfire.info(), logfire.debug(), logfire.warning(), logfire.error() methods that automatically capture context and propagate trace IDs across distributed systems using W3C Trace Context standards. Messages support f-string magic for lazy evaluation and automatic JSON serialization of complex objects via Pydantic schema generation, with built-in data scrubbing to redact sensitive fields before export.
Unique: Uses AST rewriting to implement f-string magic for lazy evaluation and automatic JSON serialization via Pydantic schema generation, combined with configurable data scrubbing patterns that redact sensitive fields before export — not just string replacement but schema-aware field masking
vs alternatives: Provides automatic context propagation and lazy f-string evaluation out-of-the-box, unlike standard Python logging which requires manual context managers; more developer-friendly than raw OpenTelemetry logging API while maintaining full OTLP compatibility
Implements distributed tracing via context managers (logfire.span()) and decorators (@logfire.instrument()) that automatically create OpenTelemetry spans with parent-child relationships, capturing execution time, attributes, and exceptions. Uses W3C Trace Context headers for cross-service propagation and maintains a thread-local/async-local context stack via OpenTelemetry's context API, enabling automatic trace ID threading without explicit parameter passing.
Unique: Combines context manager and decorator patterns with OpenTelemetry's context API to provide automatic parent-child span relationships and trace ID threading without explicit parameter passing; _LogfireWrappedSpan class adds custom features like automatic exception capture and latency measurement on top of standard OpenTelemetry spans
vs alternatives: Simpler API than raw OpenTelemetry (no manual span.start()/span.end() calls) while maintaining full OTLP compatibility; automatic context propagation is more ergonomic than Jaeger or Zipkin client libraries that require manual context threading
Provides automatic instrumentation for FastAPI, Django, Flask, and Starlette via middleware/decorators that capture HTTP request/response metadata (method, path, status code, latency) as spans. Automatically creates child spans for downstream operations (database queries, external API calls) and propagates trace context via HTTP headers (W3C Trace Context, B3, Jaeger).
Unique: Provides framework-specific middleware/decorators that integrate with each framework's request/response lifecycle, automatically capturing HTTP metadata and propagating trace context via standard headers (W3C Trace Context, B3, Jaeger); uses AST rewriting to enable zero-code instrumentation
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic OpenTelemetry instrumentation because it uses framework-native hooks; automatic trace context propagation is simpler than manual header management; zero-code instrumentation via AST rewriting requires no middleware registration
Provides automatic instrumentation for SQLAlchemy, asyncpg, psycopg, and other database drivers that captures SQL queries, parameters, execution time, and row counts as span attributes. Supports both sync and async database operations. Includes optional query redaction to mask sensitive parameters (passwords, API keys) before export.
Unique: Provides driver-specific instrumentation that captures SQL queries and parameters directly from the database driver, with optional regex-based parameter redaction for sensitive data; supports both sync and async operations with automatic context propagation
vs alternatives: More accurate than query logging because it captures actual execution time and row counts; automatic instrumentation via AST rewriting requires no code changes unlike manual wrapper functions; parameter redaction is more flexible than generic PII masking
Provides automatic instrumentation for httpx, requests, and aiohttp HTTP clients that captures outbound API calls (method, URL, status code, latency, response size) as spans. Automatically propagates trace context via HTTP headers to downstream services. Supports streaming responses and includes optional request/response body capture with redaction.
Unique: Provides client-specific instrumentation that hooks into httpx, requests, and aiohttp at the transport layer, capturing actual request/response metadata and automatically propagating trace context; supports streaming responses with automatic body size calculation
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic OpenTelemetry instrumentation because it uses client-native hooks; automatic trace context propagation is simpler than manual header management; supports both sync and async clients with consistent API
Provides native integration with Pydantic AI agents and Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers that automatically traces agent execution, tool calls, and model interactions. Captures agent state, tool inputs/outputs, and model responses as structured span attributes. Supports streaming agent responses and includes automatic token counting for LLM calls within agents.
Unique: Provides native integration with Pydantic AI's agent execution model, capturing agent state, tool calls, and model interactions as structured spans; automatic token counting and streaming response support enable detailed cost and performance analysis for multi-step agents
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic LLM instrumentation because it captures agent-specific metadata (tool calls, agent state); automatic token counting for all model calls within agents is more comprehensive than single-call instrumentation; native MCP support enables tracing of tool execution across MCP servers
Provides install_auto_tracing() function that rewrites Python AST at import time to automatically instrument function calls, database queries, and HTTP requests without code changes. Uses a plugin architecture with framework-specific handlers (FastAPI, Django, SQLAlchemy, httpx, OpenAI, LangChain, etc.) that intercept calls and create spans automatically. Configuration via environment variables or logfire.configure() controls which modules/functions are instrumented.
Unique: Uses Python AST rewriting at import time to inject span creation code into function bodies without requiring decorators or manual instrumentation; plugin architecture enables framework-specific handlers (e.g., FastAPI middleware, SQLAlchemy event listeners) to be registered and applied automatically during AST transformation
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than decorator-based instrumentation (covers entire codebase automatically) and less invasive than monkey-patching (uses standard Python import hooks); more flexible than OpenTelemetry's auto-instrumentation packages because it supports custom instrumentation rules and Pydantic-specific features
Provides native integrations for OpenAI, Anthropic, LangChain, and Pydantic AI that automatically instrument LLM API calls, capturing prompts, completions, model names, and token counts without code changes. Uses provider-specific APIs (OpenAI's usage field, Anthropic's usage object, LangChain's callbacks) to extract token metrics and logs them as span attributes and metrics. Supports streaming responses with automatic token estimation.
Unique: Provides provider-specific instrumentation that extracts token counts and usage metrics directly from provider APIs (not estimated from response length), combined with automatic prompt/completion capture and streaming response support; integrates with Pydantic AI's native observability hooks for agent-specific tracing
vs alternatives: More accurate token counting than generic LLM wrappers because it uses provider-native usage fields; automatic instrumentation via AST rewriting means no code changes needed unlike LangChain callbacks or manual wrapper functions; native Pydantic AI integration provides agent-level tracing not available in generic OpenTelemetry instrumentation
+6 more capabilities
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
Supabase scores higher at 42/100 vs logfire at 32/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities