| 1 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Starting Price | — | $10/mo |
| Capabilities | 11 decomposed | 13 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Records complete execution traces of AI agent runs including LLM calls, tool invocations, and state transitions. Implements automatic instrumentation via Python decorators and context managers that capture function calls, arguments, return values, and timing metadata without requiring manual logging code. Stores traces in a session-based structure enabling replay and debugging of multi-step agent workflows.
Unique: Uses Python context managers and automatic decorator injection to capture agent execution without modifying core agent logic, storing complete call graphs with timing and state snapshots for deterministic replay
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than print-based logging and lighter-weight than full APM solutions like DataDog, specifically optimized for LLM agent patterns rather than generic application tracing
Automatically intercepts and logs all LLM API calls (prompts, completions, token counts, latency) across multiple providers. Implements provider-agnostic instrumentation that wraps OpenAI, Anthropic, Cohere, and other client libraries to capture request/response metadata. Aggregates usage metrics and calculates per-call and per-session costs based on published pricing models.
Unique: Provides multi-provider cost aggregation with automatic pricing lookup and per-call cost attribution without requiring manual token counting or billing API integration
vs alternatives: More detailed than provider-native dashboards because it correlates costs with specific agent actions and tool calls, enabling cost optimization at the workflow level rather than just API usage
Records all agent actions in an immutable audit log suitable for compliance and regulatory requirements. Implements tamper-evident logging with checksums and timestamps. Provides filtering and export capabilities for compliance reporting (HIPAA, SOC2, etc.) and enables retention policies based on data sensitivity.
Unique: Provides tamper-evident audit logging with checksums and immutable storage, specifically designed for compliance requirements rather than generic observability
vs alternatives: More suitable for regulated industries than generic observability platforms because it emphasizes immutability and compliance reporting, while being simpler than dedicated audit log systems
Captures all tool/function invocations made by agents including function name, arguments, return values, and execution time. Implements automatic wrapping of tool registries and function definitions to log calls without modifying tool implementations. Validates tool schemas and can enforce constraints like argument types, return value formats, and execution timeouts.
Unique: Provides schema-based validation and automatic argument logging for tool calls without requiring tools to implement logging themselves, using Python's function wrapping and type inspection
vs alternatives: More granular than generic function profilers because it understands tool semantics and can validate against agent-specific constraints, while remaining provider-agnostic
Captures periodic snapshots of agent internal state including memory, context windows, and decision variables throughout execution. Implements state serialization that preserves complex Python objects (lists, dicts, custom classes) and stores them alongside execution traces. Enables comparison of state across execution steps to identify where agent behavior diverged from expected paths.
Unique: Automatically serializes and stores agent state at configurable intervals without requiring manual checkpoint code, enabling post-hoc analysis of state evolution
vs alternatives: More practical than manual logging because it captures state automatically and correlates it with execution traces, while being simpler than full debugger integration
Provides a web-based UI for viewing recorded agent sessions with interactive timeline visualization, LLM call details, tool invocation logs, and cost breakdowns. Implements client-side rendering of execution traces with filtering and search capabilities. Supports session replay mode that reconstructs agent execution step-by-step with state snapshots and decision points highlighted.
Unique: Provides interactive timeline-based visualization with integrated cost breakdown and tool call details, specifically designed for agent execution patterns rather than generic log viewing
vs alternatives: More intuitive than raw JSON logs and faster to navigate than terminal-based tools, while being more specialized than general observability platforms like Grafana
Tracks interactions between multiple agents in a system including message passing, shared state updates, and coordination events. Implements correlation of traces across agent instances using unique session IDs and parent-child relationships. Visualizes agent communication patterns and identifies bottlenecks or deadlocks in multi-agent workflows.
Unique: Correlates traces across independent agent processes using session IDs and parent-child relationships, enabling visualization of multi-agent workflows as unified execution graphs
vs alternatives: More specialized than generic distributed tracing because it understands agent-specific coordination patterns, while being simpler than full message queue monitoring
Analyzes execution traces to identify performance bottlenecks including slow LLM calls, expensive tool invocations, and inefficient agent loops. Implements statistical analysis of timing data to flag outliers and suggests optimization opportunities. Compares performance across multiple sessions to identify regressions or improvements.
Unique: Automatically identifies performance bottlenecks in agent execution by analyzing timing distributions across traces and comparing against historical baselines
vs alternatives: More targeted than generic profilers because it understands agent-specific patterns (LLM latency, tool overhead), while being more automated than manual performance analysis
+3 more capabilities
Generates single-line and multi-line code suggestions in real-time as developers type, using semantic indexing of the entire codebase to retrieve relevant type definitions, function signatures, and contextual patterns. The system maintains a 1M token context window (Pro/Team tiers) that enables suggestions informed by distant code definitions and cross-file dependencies, constructed via local codebase semantic search rather than simple token-based recency. Suggestions adapt to detected coding style on Pro/Team tiers through implicit pattern learning from recent edits.
Unique: 1M token context window with codebase-wide semantic indexing enables suggestions informed by distant code definitions and cross-file patterns, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that typically use fixed context windows (4K-32K tokens) or file-local context. Claimed 250ms latency suggests optimized retrieval pipeline, though indexing mechanism and performance at scale remain undisclosed.
vs alternatives: Larger context window than GitHub Copilot (8K-32K tokens) and faster latency than unnamed competitors (250ms vs 783ms claimed), enabling suggestions on large codebases with minimal typing delay; trade-off is cloud dependency and undisclosed free tier limitations.
Provides a separate chat interface supporting multiple LLM backends (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4, others) for conversational code assistance. Users attach files, reference recent edits, and trigger compiler diagnostic uploads; the system generates diffs and applies code changes directly to the editor. Model selection is per-conversation, and $5/month in credits (included in Pro/Team) covers external model API costs; overage pricing is undisclosed. Hotkey-driven workflow enables rapid context switching between inline completion and chat.
Unique: Multi-model chat interface with per-conversation model selection and integrated diff application, combined with compiler diagnostic auto-upload. Unlike Copilot Chat (single model per tier) or standalone ChatGPT, Supermaven Chat unifies multiple LLM backends in a single hotkey-driven workflow with direct editor integration for change application.
Supermaven scores higher at 71/100 vs agentops at 22/100. agentops leads on ecosystem, while Supermaven is stronger on adoption and quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: Supports multiple LLM backends (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet) in one interface with included credits, whereas GitHub Copilot Chat is single-model per tier and requires separate ChatGPT subscription for model switching; trade-off is credit limits and unknown overage pricing.
Supermaven Chat can automatically upload compiler diagnostic messages (errors, warnings) alongside code context to provide error-aware suggestions and fixes. The mechanism is described as 'automatically uploading your code together with compiler diagnostic messages,' but specific language/compiler support and the upload trigger mechanism are undisclosed. This feature is Chat-only and not available in inline completion.
Unique: Automatic compiler diagnostic upload in Chat for error-aware suggestions, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that require manual error context or have limited diagnostic integration. Supermaven's approach reduces friction but with undisclosed language/compiler support.
vs alternatives: Automatic diagnostic upload reduces manual context-gathering compared to manual copy-paste; trade-off is undisclosed language support and unclear upload trigger mechanism.
Supermaven offers a 30-day free trial of the Pro tier ($10/month), providing full access to 1M token context window, largest model, style adaptation, and $5/month chat credits. No credit card is required to start the trial (implied), and trial conversion to paid is automatic after 30 days unless cancelled. Trial terms and auto-renewal policy are not explicitly detailed.
Unique: 30-day free trial of Pro tier with full feature access (1M context, largest model, chat credits), versus competitors (Copilot 2-month free trial, Tabnine free tier only) with different trial lengths and feature access. Supermaven's approach is generous but with undisclosed auto-renewal terms.
vs alternatives: Full Pro feature access during trial compared to limited free tier; trade-off is undisclosed auto-renewal policy and potential unexpected charges if not cancelled.
Supermaven requires internet connectivity and server-side inference; no offline mode or local inference capability is mentioned or available. All code completion requests are sent to Supermaven's backend servers for processing, and responses are returned over the network. This creates a hard dependency on network connectivity and Supermaven's service availability; if the service is down or network is unavailable, code completion is not available.
Unique: Supermaven has no offline mode or local inference capability; all processing is server-side. GitHub Copilot also requires server-side inference, but Tabnine offers local inference options for some use cases. Supermaven's lack of offline capability is a significant limitation for developers with connectivity constraints.
vs alternatives: Supermaven's server-side-only approach is comparable to GitHub Copilot; Tabnine offers local inference options, making Tabnine more suitable for offline work. Supermaven's lack of offline capability is a weakness vs. Tabnine.
Analyzes recent code edits and inferred coding patterns to adapt inline suggestions to match team conventions, naming patterns, and structural preferences. The mechanism is implicit (not explicit fine-tuning) and operates only on Pro/Team tiers, suggesting pattern learning from editor activity rather than explicit configuration. Free tier uses a single base model without personalization.
Unique: Implicit style adaptation via editor activity analysis without explicit configuration, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that require manual style guides or explicit fine-tuning. Supermaven's approach is transparent to the user but also non-configurable and undisclosed in mechanism.
vs alternatives: Requires no manual style configuration compared to tools requiring explicit style guides; trade-off is lack of transparency and inability to control or export learned styles.
Delivers code suggestions to the editor inline as the developer types, with a claimed baseline latency of 250ms from keystroke to suggestion display. The system uses a cloud inference backend and local editor plugin to minimize round-trip time. Latency claim is positioned against an unnamed competitor (783ms), but methodology is undisclosed and no independent verification is provided.
Unique: Claimed 250ms latency via optimized cloud inference pipeline and editor plugin architecture, versus competitors with higher latency (783ms unnamed baseline). Actual differentiation is undisclosed; mechanism may involve request batching, model quantization, or edge caching, but specifics are not public.
vs alternatives: Faster than unnamed competitor (250ms vs 783ms claimed); trade-off is cloud dependency and unverified latency claim with no SLA or performance guarantee.
Provides native editor extensions for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs (IntelliJ IDEA, PyCharm, WebStorm, etc.), and Neovim, enabling inline suggestion rendering, hotkey-driven chat access, and compiler diagnostic integration directly within the editor. Each plugin variant is maintained separately and integrates with the editor's native autocomplete UI, keybinding system, and file context APIs.
Unique: Native plugins for three major editor ecosystems (VS Code, JetBrains, Neovim) with integrated chat and diff application, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that support broader editor ecosystems but with less deep integration in some cases. Supermaven's approach prioritizes depth over breadth.
vs alternatives: Deep integration with VS Code and JetBrains (native autocomplete UI, hotkey system) compared to web-based tools or lighter integrations; trade-off is limited editor support (no Sublime, Vim, Emacs) and undisclosed Neovim support details.
+5 more capabilities