| 0 |
| 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Paid |
| Capabilities | 14 decomposed | 13 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Enables declarative definition of LLM application workflows using YAML (flow.dag.yaml) that specify a directed acyclic graph of nodes representing LLM calls, prompts, and custom Python functions. The execution engine parses the YAML, validates node dependencies, and executes nodes in topological order with automatic input/output mapping between connected nodes. Supports conditional branching, loops, and dynamic node instantiation through template variables.
Unique: Uses a modular multi-package architecture (promptflow-core, promptflow-devkit, promptflow-tracing) where the core execution engine is decoupled from development tools and observability, enabling both lightweight runtime deployments and rich IDE experiences. Implements topological sorting for dependency resolution and node-level caching to optimize re-execution of unchanged nodes.
vs alternatives: Provides tighter integration with Azure ML and enterprise deployment pipelines compared to Langchain's graph-based approach, while maintaining local-first development and testing capabilities that cloud-only solutions lack.
Allows developers to define flows as Python functions or classes decorated with @flow and @tool decorators, enabling programmatic control flow with full Python expressiveness. The framework introspects function signatures to automatically extract input/output schemas, handles dependency injection of connections and tools, and executes flows with the same observability and tracing infrastructure as YAML-based DAG flows. Supports async/await patterns for concurrent execution.
Unique: Implements automatic schema extraction from Python function signatures using introspection, eliminating the need for separate schema definitions. Supports both synchronous and asynchronous execution with the same decorator interface, and integrates dependency injection for connections and tools without explicit parameter passing.
vs alternatives: More flexible than pure YAML DAG flows for complex logic, while maintaining the same deployment and observability infrastructure; differs from Langchain's LangGraph by providing automatic schema inference and tighter Azure integration.
Provides comprehensive command-line interface for flow operations including creation, testing, execution, and deployment. CLI commands enable developers to test flows locally, run batch evaluations, manage connections, and deploy to cloud platforms. Integrates with VS Code extension for IDE-based flow development and visualization.
Unique: Provides a unified CLI interface for all flow operations (test, run, evaluate, deploy) that integrates with VS Code extension for visual flow editing and debugging. CLI commands map directly to SDK operations, enabling both interactive and scripted workflows.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive CLI than Langchain which lacks integrated flow testing commands; VS Code integration provides visual debugging not available in pure CLI tools.
Maintains a persistent record of all flow executions (runs) including inputs, outputs, execution time, and resource usage. Runs can be queried, compared, and visualized to understand flow behavior over time. Supports local SQLite storage for development and Azure ML backend for production, enabling run data to be accessed across environments.
Unique: Implements a dual-backend run storage system where local development uses SQLite for lightweight tracking, while production deployments use Azure ML backend for scalability. Enables run comparison and visualization without external tools.
vs alternatives: More integrated run tracking than Langchain which lacks built-in execution history; local SQLite storage enables offline development unlike cloud-only solutions.
Supports processing of images and documents within flows, including image loading, resizing, format conversion, and OCR for text extraction. Integrates with vision LLM models (GPT-4V, etc.) for image understanding tasks. Handles various input formats (PNG, JPEG, PDF) and automatically manages image encoding for LLM APIs.
Unique: Integrates image and document handling directly into flow execution model, enabling seamless processing of multimodal inputs without separate preprocessing steps. Automatically handles image encoding for different LLM vision APIs (OpenAI, Azure, etc.).
vs alternatives: More integrated multimedia support than Langchain which requires separate image processing libraries; automatic image encoding for LLM APIs reduces boilerplate.
Provides deep integration with Azure ML platform enabling flows to be executed on cloud compute clusters, stored in Azure ML registries, and deployed as managed endpoints. Handles authentication, compute resource management, and integration with Azure ML monitoring and governance tools. Enables seamless transition from local development to cloud production.
Unique: Implements a separate promptflow-azure package that extends core functionality with Azure-specific features, enabling local-first development with optional cloud deployment without forcing Azure dependency. Integrates with Azure ML compute clusters for distributed execution and managed endpoints for production serving.
vs alternatives: Tighter Azure ML integration than generic containerization approaches; enables cloud deployment without Docker/Kubernetes expertise. Supports both batch and real-time serving on Azure ML unlike tools that only support one mode.
Introduces a lightweight .prompty file format that bundles prompt templates, LLM configuration (model, temperature, max_tokens), and Python code in a single file for simple LLM interactions. The format uses YAML frontmatter for metadata and configuration, followed by Jinja2 template syntax for the prompt, enabling quick iteration on prompts without managing separate files. Prompty files can be executed directly via CLI or imported as flows.
Unique: Combines prompt template, LLM configuration, and execution logic in a single human-readable file format with YAML frontmatter and Jinja2 templating, reducing file fragmentation and making prompts more portable and shareable than separate configuration files.
vs alternatives: Simpler and more self-contained than managing separate prompt files + configuration files like in Langchain, while still supporting version control and sharing; bridges the gap between ad-hoc prompt experimentation and production flows.
Provides pre-built tool nodes for common LLM providers (OpenAI, Azure OpenAI, Anthropic, Ollama) with standardized interfaces that abstract provider-specific API differences. Tools handle authentication via connection objects, parameter validation, token counting, and response parsing. Developers can reference these tools in flows without implementing provider-specific logic, and the framework automatically manages API calls, retries, and error handling.
Unique: Implements a connection-based abstraction layer where provider credentials are stored separately from flow definitions, enabling secure credential management and easy provider switching without modifying flow YAML. Integrates token counting via provider-specific tokenizers and tracks usage metrics for cost analysis.
vs alternatives: More seamless provider switching than Langchain's LLMChain which requires explicit model instantiation; tighter Azure OpenAI integration than open-source alternatives; built-in token counting and cost tracking that most frameworks lack.
+6 more capabilities
LangChain provides a Chain abstraction that sequences LLM calls, prompt templates, and tool invocations into directed acyclic graphs (DAGs). Chains support sequential execution (SequentialChain), conditional branching (RouterChain), and parallel execution patterns. The framework uses a Runnable interface that standardizes input/output contracts across all chain components, enabling composition via pipe operators and method chaining. This allows developers to build complex multi-step workflows without managing state manually.
Unique: Uses a unified Runnable interface across all components (LLMs, tools, retrievers, parsers) enabling composability via pipe operators, unlike frameworks that require separate orchestration layers for different component types. Supports both sync and async execution with identical code paths.
vs alternatives: More flexible than simple prompt chaining (like OpenAI's function calling alone) because it abstracts orchestration logic, making chains reusable and testable; simpler than full workflow engines (Airflow, Prefect) because it's optimized for LLM-specific patterns rather than general data pipelines.
LangChain's PromptTemplate class provides structured prompt engineering with variable placeholders, automatic validation, and support for few-shot learning patterns. Templates use Jinja2-style syntax for variable substitution and support dynamic example selection via ExampleSelector. The framework includes specialized templates (ChatPromptTemplate for multi-turn conversations, FewShotPromptTemplate for in-context learning) that handle formatting differences across LLM types. This enables prompt reusability, version control, and systematic experimentation without string concatenation.
Unique: Provides first-class abstractions for few-shot learning (FewShotPromptTemplate) with pluggable ExampleSelector strategies, enabling dynamic example selection based on input similarity without requiring developers to implement selection logic. Separates system prompts, conversation history, and user input in ChatPromptTemplate, making multi-turn conversations composable.
LangChain scores higher at 41/100 vs promptflow at 24/100. However, promptflow offers a free tier which may be better for getting started.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: More structured than manual string formatting because it validates variable names and supports semantic example selection; more specialized than generic templating engines (Jinja2) because it understands LLM-specific patterns like chat message roles and few-shot formatting.
LangChain abstracts function calling across LLM providers by converting Python functions or Pydantic models into provider-specific schemas (OpenAI function_call, Anthropic tool_use, etc.). The framework automatically generates schemas, handles argument parsing, and routes calls to the correct provider. Developers define functions once and LangChain handles provider-specific formatting. This enables tool use without learning each provider's function calling API.
Unique: Automatically converts Python functions and Pydantic models into provider-specific function calling schemas (OpenAI, Anthropic, Cohere, etc.) and handles parsing and routing transparently. Developers define tools once and LangChain handles provider-specific formatting and execution.
vs alternatives: More portable than using provider SDKs directly because function definitions are provider-agnostic; more automated than manual schema management because schemas are generated from function signatures.
LangChain supports streaming LLM output at token granularity, enabling real-time user feedback as tokens are generated. The framework provides streaming iterators and async generators that yield tokens as they arrive from the LLM. Streaming is integrated into chains and agents, so developers can stream output from complex workflows without special handling. This enables responsive user experiences where output appears in real-time rather than waiting for full completion.
Unique: Integrates streaming at the framework level so chains and agents can stream output transparently without special handling. Provides both sync and async streaming iterators and handles provider-specific streaming formats uniformly.
vs alternatives: More integrated than provider-specific streaming APIs because streaming works across chains and agents; more responsive than buffering full output because tokens appear in real-time.
LangChain provides async/await support throughout the framework, enabling concurrent execution of LLM calls, chains, and agents. All major components (LLMs, chains, retrievers, agents) have async variants (e.g., arun() alongside run()). The framework uses asyncio for Python and native async/await for Node.js. This enables high-concurrency applications that can handle multiple requests simultaneously without blocking. Async execution is transparent; developers write the same code as sync but use async/await syntax.
Unique: Provides async/await support throughout the framework with parallel async implementations of all major components. Enables transparent concurrent execution without requiring developers to manage thread pools or explicit parallelization.
vs alternatives: More integrated than manual async management because async is built into the framework; more scalable than sync-only implementations because it enables handling multiple concurrent requests.
LangChain abstracts LLM APIs behind a common BaseLanguageModel interface, supporting OpenAI, Anthropic, Cohere, Hugging Face, Ollama, and 20+ other providers. The abstraction handles provider-specific details: token counting, streaming, function calling schemas, and cost tracking. Developers write LLM-agnostic code and swap providers via configuration. The framework includes built-in retry logic, rate limiting, and fallback chains for reliability. This enables portability and cost optimization without rewriting application logic.
Unique: Implements a unified BaseLanguageModel interface that abstracts away provider differences in token counting, streaming protocols, and function calling schemas. Includes built-in retry policies, rate limiting, and cost tracking at the framework level rather than requiring developers to implement these separately for each provider.
vs alternatives: More portable than using provider SDKs directly because swapping providers requires only configuration changes; more comprehensive than simple wrapper libraries because it handles streaming, retries, and cost tracking uniformly across 20+ providers.
LangChain provides a Retriever abstraction that enables RAG by connecting LLMs to external knowledge sources. The framework supports multiple retrieval strategies: vector similarity search (via VectorStore), BM25 keyword search, hybrid search, and custom retrievers. Documents are chunked, embedded, and stored in vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate, Chroma, FAISS, etc.). The RetrievalQA chain automatically retrieves relevant documents and passes them as context to the LLM. This enables LLMs to answer questions grounded in custom data without fine-tuning.
Unique: Provides a unified Retriever interface that abstracts different retrieval strategies (vector, keyword, hybrid, custom) and integrates seamlessly with LLM chains via RetrievalQA. Includes built-in document loaders for 50+ formats (PDF, HTML, Markdown, code files) and automatic chunking strategies, reducing boilerplate for document ingestion.
vs alternatives: More integrated than building RAG from scratch because document loading, chunking, embedding, and retrieval are unified in one framework; more flexible than specialized RAG platforms (Pinecone, Weaviate) because it supports multiple vector stores and custom retrieval logic.
LangChain's Agent abstraction enables autonomous task execution by combining LLMs with tools (functions, APIs, retrievers). The agent uses an action-observation loop: the LLM decides which tool to call based on the task, executes the tool, observes the result, and repeats until the task is complete. Agents support multiple reasoning strategies: ReAct (reasoning + acting), chain-of-thought, and tool-use patterns. The framework handles tool schema generation, argument parsing, and error recovery. This enables building autonomous systems that can decompose complex tasks without explicit step-by-step instructions.
Unique: Implements a generalized Agent interface that supports multiple reasoning strategies (ReAct, chain-of-thought, tool-use) and automatically handles tool schema generation, argument parsing, and error recovery. The action-observation loop is abstracted, allowing developers to focus on defining tools rather than implementing agent logic.
vs alternatives: More flexible than simple function calling (OpenAI's tool_choice) because it implements multi-step reasoning and tool sequencing; more accessible than building agents from scratch because it handles schema generation, parsing, and error recovery automatically.
+5 more capabilities