| 0 |
| 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 6 decomposed | 12 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Whisper implements a fixed-size round-robin database that pre-allocates disk space for time-series metrics and overwrites oldest data when capacity is reached, eliminating dynamic allocation overhead. Data is written sequentially by the Carbon ingestion service into pre-defined storage slots indexed by timestamp, enabling predictable disk usage and O(1) write performance regardless of dataset age. The circular buffer design trades retention flexibility for guaranteed storage footprint and consistent write latency.
Unique: Uses fixed-size circular buffer design with pre-allocated disk space and sequential writes, eliminating dynamic allocation and enabling deterministic write performance — unlike traditional databases that grow dynamically and require compaction/vacuuming
vs alternatives: Provides guaranteed O(1) write latency and predictable disk footprint for long-term metric storage, whereas InfluxDB and Prometheus require active compaction and dynamic scaling to maintain performance
Whisper supports creating multiple aggregation levels (e.g., 1-minute raw data, 10-minute averages, 1-hour summaries) within a single database file, enabling efficient long-term storage by downsampling older data while preserving high-resolution recent data. Each retention tier is a separate round-robin buffer with different time granularity and aggregation function (average, sum, last, etc.), allowing queries to select appropriate resolution based on time range. This hierarchical approach reduces storage for historical data while maintaining query flexibility without requiring separate database files.
Unique: Implements multi-resolution storage within single database files using stacked round-robin buffers with configurable aggregation functions per tier, enabling space-efficient long-term retention without separate database files or external aggregation pipelines
vs alternatives: More storage-efficient than Prometheus for long-term retention because aggregation happens at write-time into fixed-size buffers, whereas Prometheus requires external tools like Thanos for downsampling and long-term storage
Whisper integrates with the Carbon service through a write API that accepts timestamped metric data and routes writes to appropriate storage slots based on metric name and timestamp. Carbon handles network protocol parsing (plaintext, pickle, AMQP) and metric name validation, then delegates to Whisper for storage, which maps timestamps to fixed storage offsets using modulo arithmetic on the circular buffer. This separation enables Carbon to handle protocol complexity while Whisper focuses on efficient storage, with no direct user-facing API — all writes flow through Carbon.
Unique: Delegates protocol handling to Carbon while Whisper focuses purely on storage, using timestamp-based modulo arithmetic for O(1) write routing without index lookups — enabling high-throughput ingestion without database overhead
vs alternatives: Simpler write path than InfluxDB (no query parsing, no schema validation at storage layer) but less flexible than Prometheus (no built-in scraping, requires external metric collection)
Whisper provides a read interface consumed by Graphite-web to retrieve time-series data for graph rendering and API responses. Queries specify metric name and time range, and Whisper maps the time range to storage offsets in the circular buffer, reading only the relevant data without scanning the entire file. Graphite-web handles query parsing, metric pattern matching, and result formatting (PNG, CSV, JSON, XML), while Whisper provides the low-level storage retrieval. This separation enables Graphite-web to support complex queries (wildcards, functions, aggregations) without Whisper needing to understand query semantics.
Unique: Provides time-range-based retrieval using circular buffer offset calculation, enabling efficient reads without index structures — Graphite-web handles all query complexity, keeping Whisper focused on fast storage access
vs alternatives: Simpler query interface than InfluxDB (no query language, no server-side aggregation) but requires external tool (Graphite-web) for complex queries, whereas Prometheus includes query language in storage layer
Whisper requires upfront schema definition specifying retention policies (how long to keep data at each resolution) and aggregation functions (how to downsample data between tiers). Schema is typically defined in a configuration file (storage-schemas.conf) that maps metric name patterns to retention/aggregation rules, which Carbon uses to create Whisper database files with matching structure. Once created, schema is immutable — changing retention or aggregation requires recreating the database file and losing historical data. This design trades flexibility for predictability: storage footprint and query performance are determined at schema definition time.
Unique: Requires upfront schema definition with immutable retention/aggregation configuration, enabling deterministic storage allocation and performance but requiring careful planning — unlike dynamic schema systems (InfluxDB, Prometheus) that adapt to incoming data
vs alternatives: Provides predictable storage costs and performance through schema-driven design, whereas Prometheus and InfluxDB require active management of retention policies and cardinality limits to prevent unbounded growth
Whisper stores each metric as a single binary file on disk containing a header (metadata about retention tiers and aggregation) followed by pre-allocated round-robin buffers. Files are created at metric creation time with full size allocated upfront, eliminating fragmentation and enabling direct offset calculation for reads/writes. The binary format is compact and uncompressed, optimized for sequential access patterns typical of time-series workloads. No indexing structures are maintained — metric discovery relies on filesystem directory scanning, making Whisper suitable for systems with moderate metric cardinality (thousands to tens of thousands) but not billions of unique metrics.
Unique: Uses single-file-per-metric design with pre-allocated binary storage and no indexing, enabling O(1) offset calculation for reads/writes but requiring filesystem-level metric discovery — simpler than database systems but less scalable than indexed storage
vs alternatives: Simpler operational model than InfluxDB or Prometheus (no compaction, no WAL management) but less efficient for high-cardinality metrics (billions of unique series) where filesystem overhead becomes prohibitive
Converts text input to natural-sounding speech across 1100+ languages using a unified TTS API that abstracts model selection, text processing, and vocoder execution. The system loads pre-trained model weights and configurations from a centralized catalog (.models.json), applies language-specific text normalization, generates mel-spectrograms via the selected TTS model (VITS, Tacotron2, GlowTTS, etc.), and converts spectrograms to audio waveforms using neural vocoders. The Synthesizer class orchestrates this pipeline, handling sentence segmentation, speaker/language routing, and audio post-processing in a single inference call.
Unique: Supports 1100+ languages through a unified model catalog system (.models.json) with automatic model discovery and download, rather than requiring manual model selection or separate language-specific APIs. The Synthesizer class abstracts the complexity of text processing, model routing, and vocoder chaining into a single inference interface.
vs alternatives: Broader language coverage (1100+ vs ~50 for Google Cloud TTS) and fully open-source with no API rate limits or cloud dependency, though with higher latency than commercial services.
Generates speech in specific speaker voices by routing speaker IDs or speaker embeddings through multi-speaker TTS models (VITS, Tacotron2) that were trained on datasets with multiple speakers. The system maintains speaker metadata in model configurations, validates speaker IDs at inference time, and passes speaker embeddings or speaker conditioning vectors to the model's speaker encoder layers. For models without pre-trained speaker support, the framework provides a Speaker Encoder training pipeline to learn speaker embeddings from custom voice data, enabling zero-shot speaker adaptation.
Unique: Implements a modular Speaker Encoder training pipeline that learns speaker embeddings independently from the TTS model, enabling zero-shot speaker adaptation without retraining the entire synthesis model. Speaker embeddings are computed once and cached, reducing inference overhead for repeated synthesis in the same speaker voice.
TTS scores higher at 25/100 vs whisper at 20/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: Supports both pre-trained multi-speaker models and custom speaker fine-tuning in a unified framework, whereas most open-source TTS systems require separate model training for each new speaker.
Uses YAML configuration files to define model architectures, training hyperparameters, and dataset specifications, decoupling configuration from code and enabling reproducible experiments without code changes. Each model architecture (Tacotron2, VITS, GlowTTS, etc.) has a corresponding config class (e.g., Tacotron2Config) that loads YAML files and validates parameters. Training scripts read configuration files to instantiate models, create data loaders, and configure optimizers and learning rate schedules. This approach allows users to experiment with different hyperparameters, model architectures, and datasets by modifying YAML files rather than editing Python code, improving reproducibility and reducing the barrier to entry for non-programmers.
Unique: Implements a configuration-driven architecture where model instantiation, training setup, and hyperparameter specification are entirely driven by YAML files, enabling reproducible experiments without code changes. Configuration classes validate parameters and provide sensible defaults, reducing the need for manual configuration.
vs alternatives: More accessible than code-based configuration (YAML is human-readable) and more flexible than GUI-based configuration tools (full expressiveness of YAML), though less type-safe than Python-based configuration.
Orchestrates the inference pipeline by automatically composing TTS models with compatible vocoders, handling text processing, spectrogram generation, and waveform synthesis in a single call. The Synthesizer class manages the pipeline: it loads the TTS model and its paired vocoder from configuration, applies text normalization and sentence segmentation, runs the TTS model to generate mel-spectrograms, applies vocoder-specific normalization, runs the vocoder to generate waveforms, and optionally applies post-processing (silence trimming, loudness normalization). The system validates model compatibility (e.g., spectrogram dimensions match between TTS and vocoder) and provides clear error messages if incompatible models are paired.
Unique: Implements automatic model composition where the TTS model's configuration specifies the compatible vocoder, and the Synthesizer automatically loads and chains them without user intervention. This ensures compatibility and reduces the risk of users pairing incompatible models.
vs alternatives: More user-friendly than manual model composition (no need to understand TTS/vocoder compatibility) and more robust than single-model systems (supports multiple vocoder options for quality/speed trade-offs).
Maintains a centralized model catalog (.models.json) containing metadata for 100+ pre-trained TTS and vocoder models, enabling users to list available models, query by language/architecture/dataset, and automatically download model weights and configurations from remote repositories. The ModelManager class handles HTTP-based model fetching, local caching, configuration path updates, and version management. When a user requests a model by name, the system looks up the model in the catalog, downloads weights if not cached locally, and loads the configuration YAML file that specifies model architecture, hyperparameters, and vocoder pairing.
Unique: Implements a declarative model catalog system (.models.json) that decouples model metadata from code, allowing new models to be added without code changes. The ModelManager automatically updates configuration file paths when models are downloaded, ensuring portability across different installation directories.
vs alternatives: More transparent than Hugging Face model hub (explicit catalog file) and more language-focused than generic model zoos, with built-in vocoder pairing and TTS-specific metadata.
Preprocesses raw text input by applying language-specific text normalization (expanding abbreviations, converting numbers to words, handling punctuation) and splitting text into sentences to manage synthesis latency and memory usage. The system uses language-specific text processors (defined in TTS/tts/utils/text/) that handle character sets, phoneme conversion, and linguistic rules for each language. Sentence segmentation uses regex-based splitting with language-aware punctuation rules, preventing incorrect splits on abbreviations or decimal numbers. This preprocessing ensures consistent phoneme generation and prevents out-of-memory errors on very long texts.
Unique: Uses modular language-specific text processors (one per language) that encapsulate phoneme rules, abbreviation expansion, and character normalization, rather than a single universal text processor. This allows fine-grained control over pronunciation for each language without affecting others.
vs alternatives: More linguistically aware than simple regex-based normalization (handles language-specific rules) but less sophisticated than full NLP pipelines (no dependency on spaCy or NLTK, reducing library bloat).
Converts mel-spectrogram outputs from TTS models into high-quality audio waveforms using neural vocoder models (HiFi-GAN, Glow-TTS vocoder, WaveGlow). The vocoder inference pipeline takes spectrograms generated by the TTS model, applies optional normalization and denormalization based on vocoder-specific statistics, and passes them through the vocoder's neural network to produce raw audio samples. The system supports multiple vocoder architectures and automatically selects the appropriate vocoder based on the TTS model's configuration, ensuring spectral compatibility. Vocoders are loaded separately from TTS models, enabling vocoder swapping without retraining the TTS model.
Unique: Implements vocoder abstraction as a separate, swappable component with automatic spectrogram normalization based on vocoder-specific statistics, enabling zero-shot vocoder switching without TTS model retraining. The system maintains vocoder metadata in model configurations, ensuring compatibility checking at inference time.
vs alternatives: Supports multiple vocoder architectures (HiFi-GAN, Glow-TTS, WaveGlow) in a unified interface, whereas most TTS systems hardcode a single vocoder or require manual vocoder integration.
Provides a complete training pipeline for building custom TTS models from scratch or fine-tuning pre-trained models on new datasets. The training system uses PyTorch-based model definitions (Tacotron2, VITS, GlowTTS, etc.), configuration files (YAML) that specify hyperparameters, and a DataLoader that handles audio preprocessing (mel-spectrogram computation), text normalization, and speaker/language conditioning. The training loop implements gradient accumulation, mixed precision training, learning rate scheduling, and checkpoint management. Users define custom datasets by creating metadata files (CSV with audio paths and transcriptions) and specifying dataset-specific configuration (sample rate, mel-spectrogram parameters, speaker count).
Unique: Implements a modular training system where model architecture, dataset handling, and training loop are decoupled through configuration files (YAML), allowing users to swap model architectures or datasets without code changes. The system supports multiple dataset formats and automatically handles audio preprocessing (mel-spectrogram computation, normalization) based on configuration.
vs alternatives: More flexible than commercial TTS services (full model control, no API limits) and more accessible than research frameworks (pre-built training loops, example datasets), though requires more infrastructure than cloud services.
+4 more capabilities