Magnum v4 72B ranks higher at 25/100 vs Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 at 23/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 | Magnum v4 72B |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Model | Model |
| UnfragileRank | 23/100 | 25/100 |
| Adoption | 0 | 0 |
| Quality | 0 | 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Starting Price | $1.50e-7 per prompt token | $3.00e-6 per prompt token |
| Capabilities | 10 decomposed | 8 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Implements a Mixture-of-Experts architecture that activates only 22B of 235B parameters per forward pass using learned gating mechanisms to route tokens to specialized expert subnetworks. This sparse activation pattern reduces computational cost while maintaining model capacity through expert specialization, enabling complex multi-step reasoning without full model inference overhead. The routing mechanism learns to distribute different reasoning types (mathematical, logical, creative) across domain-specific experts during training.
Unique: Uses learned gating mechanisms to route tokens to 22B active experts from a 235B total pool, implementing true sparse MoE rather than dense-with-pruning approaches. The A22B designation indicates Alibaba's specific expert configuration and routing strategy, which differs from standard MoE implementations in how experts are specialized and load-balanced.
vs alternatives: Achieves 235B-parameter reasoning quality at ~10% of dense inference cost compared to Llama 405B or GPT-4, while maintaining faster latency than dense models through selective expert activation
Supports a 262,144-token context window enabling processing of entire codebases, research papers, or multi-document reasoning tasks in a single forward pass. Uses position interpolation or ALiBi (Attention with Linear Biases) to extend context beyond training length without catastrophic performance degradation. This allows the model to maintain coherence across long reasoning chains and reference distant context without losing information to context truncation.
Unique: Implements 262K context through position interpolation combined with MoE sparse routing, allowing long-context reasoning without the full computational cost of dense 235B inference. The sparse activation means attention computation is still bounded by expert routing decisions, not full quadratic scaling.
vs alternatives: Supports 64x longer context than GPT-4 Turbo (4K) and 6x longer than Claude 3.5 Sonnet (200K) while maintaining faster inference through sparse MoE activation
Implements a thinking-token architecture where the model generates explicit intermediate reasoning steps before producing final answers, similar to OpenAI's o1 approach. The model allocates a portion of its output budget to internal reasoning (marked with special thinking tokens) that are hidden from users but influence the final answer generation. This enables the model to decompose complex problems into sub-steps, backtrack on reasoning paths, and verify intermediate conclusions before committing to a final response.
Unique: Uses explicit thinking tokens during generation that are processed by the model but not returned to users by default, enabling internal reasoning verification without exposing intermediate steps. This differs from prompt-based chain-of-thought (which requires explicit user prompting) by making reasoning a native architectural feature.
vs alternatives: Provides reasoning transparency similar to o1 but with faster inference than o1 (which uses reinforcement learning) through architectural thinking tokens rather than learned reasoning policies
Supports reasoning and generation across 100+ languages using a unified tokenizer and shared expert pool, enabling code-switching and cross-lingual reasoning without language-specific model variants. The model was trained on multilingual data with shared MoE experts that specialize in linguistic patterns rather than language-specific experts, allowing knowledge transfer across languages and enabling reasoning tasks that mix multiple languages in a single prompt.
Unique: Uses a single unified tokenizer and shared MoE expert pool for 100+ languages rather than language-specific experts or separate tokenizers, enabling true cross-lingual reasoning where experts learn language-agnostic reasoning patterns. This contrasts with models that have language-specific expert subgroups.
vs alternatives: Supports more languages than GPT-4 with unified reasoning (no language-specific degradation) and faster inference than separate language-specific models through shared expert routing
Generates and reasons about code across 40+ programming languages using syntax-aware token prediction and language-specific expert routing. The model recognizes language-specific patterns (indentation, syntax rules, common idioms) and routes tokens to experts specialized in particular languages or programming paradigms. This enables generation of syntactically correct code, reasoning about code structure, and cross-language refactoring suggestions without requiring explicit language specification in prompts.
Unique: Routes code generation through language-specific MoE experts that learn syntax patterns and idioms for each language, enabling syntax-aware generation without explicit language specification. The sparse routing means the model activates only relevant language experts per token, reducing interference from unrelated languages.
vs alternatives: Supports more programming languages than Copilot with unified reasoning (no separate model per language) and faster inference than dense models through sparse expert activation
Generates structured outputs (JSON, XML, YAML) that conform to user-provided schemas through constrained decoding and schema-aware expert routing. The model reasons about schema constraints during generation and routes tokens through experts that specialize in structured data formatting, ensuring output validity without post-processing. This enables reliable extraction of structured data from unstructured inputs and generation of API-ready responses without validation overhead.
Unique: Implements schema-aware expert routing where experts specialize in structured formatting patterns, combined with constrained decoding that validates tokens against schema at generation time. This ensures structural validity without post-processing, unlike models that generate freely and require validation.
vs alternatives: Guarantees schema-compliant output without post-processing validation (unlike GPT-4 which requires output validation) and faster than models using external constraint solvers
Supports function calling through a unified interface that routes function invocations to specialized experts and integrates with multiple tool providers (OpenAI-compatible APIs, custom webhooks, MCP servers). The model generates function calls in a standardized format, and the inference platform routes these calls to appropriate handlers based on function registry configuration. This enables building agentic systems where the model can invoke external tools, APIs, and services without requiring separate tool-calling models.
Unique: Routes function-calling decisions through MoE experts that specialize in tool selection and parameter generation, enabling the model to learn which tools are appropriate for different task types. The sparse activation means only relevant tool-selection experts are active, reducing interference from unrelated tools.
vs alternatives: Supports more simultaneous tool integrations than Copilot and faster function-calling latency than dense models through sparse expert routing
Learns new tasks and adapts behavior from examples provided in the prompt context without requiring model fine-tuning or retraining. The model uses in-context learning mechanisms where examples are processed through the same reasoning pipeline as the main task, enabling rapid task adaptation. This allows the model to handle domain-specific terminology, custom output formats, and specialized reasoning patterns by simply providing examples in the prompt.
Unique: Implements in-context learning through the same MoE routing mechanism as main task reasoning, allowing examples to influence expert routing decisions for the main task. This enables the model to learn task-specific expert specializations from context without fine-tuning.
vs alternatives: Faster few-shot adaptation than fine-tuning-based approaches and more flexible than models requiring explicit task-specific training
+2 more capabilities
Generates natural language responses mimicking Claude 3 Sonnet/Opus writing style through fine-tuning on Qwen2.5 72B base model. Uses instruction-tuned architecture to follow complex multi-step prompts while maintaining coherent, well-structured prose with appropriate tone and formality levels. The model learns stylistic patterns from Claude outputs during fine-tuning rather than using retrieval or prompt engineering alone.
Unique: Fine-tuned specifically on Claude 3 Sonnet/Opus output patterns rather than generic instruction-tuning, creating a style-matched alternative that preserves Anthropic's prose characteristics while running on Qwen2.5's 72B architecture
vs alternatives: Offers Claude-quality writing at lower cost than Anthropic's API and with more deployment flexibility than proprietary models, though with less transparency about training methodology than fully open-source alternatives like Llama
Maintains coherent multi-turn dialogue through transformer-based attention mechanisms that track conversation history and speaker context. The instruction-tuned architecture processes entire conversation threads as input, allowing the model to reference previous exchanges, maintain consistent character/tone, and resolve pronouns and references across turns without explicit memory structures.
Unique: Inherits Qwen2.5's instruction-tuning approach to conversation, which explicitly trains on multi-turn formats with clear role markers, enabling better context resolution than models trained primarily on single-turn examples
vs alternatives: Simpler integration than systems requiring external memory stores (RAG, vector DBs) since context is handled natively, but less sophisticated than models with explicit memory architectures or retrieval-augmented approaches for very long conversations
Magnum v4 72B scores higher at 25/100 vs Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 at 23/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Generates code snippets and technical explanations by applying instruction-tuned patterns learned from fine-tuning on Claude outputs. The model understands code context from natural language descriptions, can generate multiple programming languages, and provides explanations alongside code. Implementation relies on transformer attention over code tokens and learned associations between natural language intent and code patterns.
Unique: Fine-tuned on Claude's code generation outputs, capturing Anthropic's approach to code explanation and safety considerations (e.g., error handling suggestions) rather than pure code-to-code translation
vs alternatives: Provides better code explanations and safety context than specialized code models like CodeLlama, but likely slower and less specialized than models fine-tuned specifically on code-only datasets
Applies learned chain-of-thought reasoning patterns from Claude fine-tuning to break down complex problems into steps. The model generates intermediate reasoning steps before final answers, using transformer attention to track logical dependencies across reasoning chains. This is achieved through instruction-tuning on examples where Claude explicitly shows reasoning work.
Unique: Inherits Claude's explicit chain-of-thought training approach, which emphasizes showing reasoning work as part of the output rather than reasoning internally, making reasoning patterns visible and auditable
vs alternatives: More transparent reasoning than models without explicit chain-of-thought training, but less specialized than models fine-tuned specifically on mathematical reasoning datasets or formal logic
Condenses long-form text into summaries while preserving key information, using attention mechanisms to identify salient content and instruction-tuned patterns for summary formatting. The model learns from Claude's summarization style, which emphasizes clarity and hierarchical organization of information. Works by attending to important tokens and generating compressed representations.
Unique: Fine-tuned on Claude's summarization outputs, which emphasize hierarchical structure and clear topic organization rather than extractive summarization, producing more readable abstracts
vs alternatives: Better prose quality and readability than extractive summarization tools, but less specialized than models fine-tuned specifically on summarization tasks or using dedicated abstractive architectures
Executes complex, multi-part instructions by parsing task structure and maintaining execution context across steps. The instruction-tuned architecture learns to identify task boundaries, handle conditional logic (if-then patterns), and sequence operations correctly. Implementation relies on transformer attention to track task state and learned patterns from Claude's instruction-following training.
Unique: Trained on Claude's instruction-following patterns, which emphasize explicit acknowledgment of task structure and step-by-step execution reporting, making task progress transparent
vs alternatives: More reliable instruction-following than base models without instruction-tuning, but less specialized than models with explicit task planning architectures or reinforcement learning from human feedback on instruction compliance
Answers questions by understanding context, identifying relevant information, and generating coherent responses. Uses transformer attention to locate answer-relevant tokens and instruction-tuned patterns to format responses appropriately. The model learns from Claude's question-answering style, which emphasizes accuracy, nuance, and acknowledgment of uncertainty.
Unique: Fine-tuned on Claude's QA outputs, which emphasize acknowledging uncertainty, providing nuanced answers, and explaining reasoning rather than simple factual retrieval
vs alternatives: Better answer quality and nuance than retrieval-based QA systems, but without external knowledge bases or web search, limited to training data knowledge unlike RAG-augmented systems
Generates creative text including stories, essays, marketing copy, and other original content by learning stylistic patterns from Claude's creative outputs. The model uses transformer attention to maintain narrative coherence, character consistency, and thematic development across generated text. Fine-tuning captures Claude's approach to balancing creativity with clarity.
Unique: Fine-tuned on Claude's creative outputs, which balance imaginative storytelling with clarity and coherence, producing more readable creative content than models trained purely on internet text
vs alternatives: Better prose quality and narrative coherence than base language models, but less specialized than models fine-tuned specifically on creative writing datasets or with explicit story structure training