| 0 |
| 0 |
| Quality | 0 | 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Starting Price | $1.20e-7 per prompt token | $3.00e-6 per prompt token |
| Capabilities | 12 decomposed | 8 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Generates code using a sparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture with 80B total parameters but only 3B activated per token, enabling efficient inference on consumer hardware while maintaining reasoning depth. The sparse routing mechanism dynamically selects expert subnetworks based on input context, reducing computational overhead compared to dense models while preserving multi-language code understanding and generation quality.
Unique: Uses sparse MoE with 3B active parameters out of 80B total, enabling 10-15x inference speedup vs dense equivalents while maintaining code reasoning quality through dynamic expert routing based on token context
vs alternatives: Faster and cheaper than dense 70B models (Llama 2, Mistral) while matching or exceeding code quality; more efficient than dense Qwen 2.5 Coder due to sparse activation reducing memory bandwidth bottlenecks
Completes code across 40+ programming languages by maintaining language-specific syntax trees and semantic context windows up to 128K tokens. The model uses language-aware tokenization and positional embeddings to understand code structure, enabling completions that respect scope, type hints, and import dependencies rather than purely statistical pattern matching.
Unique: Trained on diverse code repositories with language-specific tokenization and 128K context window, enabling cross-file dependency tracking and scope-aware completions that understand import chains and type annotations across 40+ languages
vs alternatives: Broader language coverage and longer context than GitHub Copilot (which focuses on Python/JavaScript); more efficient inference than Claude or GPT-4 for code-only tasks due to specialized training
Translates code between programming languages while preserving logic and adapting to target language idioms. The model understands language-specific patterns, standard libraries, and best practices to produce idiomatic code rather than literal translations.
Unique: Translates code across 40+ languages while adapting to target language idioms and standard libraries, producing idiomatic code rather than literal translations through language-specific training
vs alternatives: Broader language coverage than specialized transpilers; more idiomatic than literal AST-based translation; comparable to Claude but with faster inference due to sparse MoE
Explains code functionality at multiple levels of abstraction (line-by-line, function-level, module-level) by analyzing code structure, control flow, and data dependencies. The model generates explanations in natural language with examples and diagrams (as text) to help developers understand unfamiliar code.
Unique: Generates multi-level code explanations (line-by-line, function, module) with control flow analysis and data dependency tracking, producing natural language summaries with examples and ASCII diagrams
vs alternatives: More detailed than IDE hover tooltips; comparable to Claude but with faster inference and code-specific training for better technical accuracy
Supports structured function calling through JSON schema definitions, enabling agents to invoke external tools and APIs by generating valid function calls with typed parameters. The model outputs function names and arguments as structured JSON that can be directly parsed and executed, with built-in validation against provided schemas to ensure parameter types match function signatures.
Unique: Generates valid JSON function calls with parameter validation against provided schemas, enabling reliable tool invocation in agentic workflows without post-processing or error correction
vs alternatives: More reliable function calling than base Qwen 2.5 due to agent-specific training; comparable to Claude 3.5 Sonnet but with 10x lower inference cost due to sparse MoE architecture
Refactors code across multiple files by understanding import dependencies, function call graphs, and type relationships across the entire codebase context window. The model tracks variable definitions, function signatures, and class hierarchies to suggest refactorings that maintain correctness across file boundaries, such as renaming functions with all call sites updated or extracting shared logic into utilities.
Unique: Maintains cross-file dependency graphs within 128K context window, enabling refactorings that update imports, function signatures, and call sites across multiple files simultaneously rather than single-file edits
vs alternatives: More context-aware than IDE-based refactoring tools (which operate on single files); cheaper and faster than Claude for large-scale refactoring due to sparse MoE efficiency
Generates unit tests and integration tests by analyzing code structure, identifying edge cases, and creating test cases that cover branches and error paths. The model understands testing frameworks (pytest, Jest, JUnit) and generates tests with proper assertions, mocking, and setup/teardown logic based on the code under test.
Unique: Generates framework-specific tests (pytest, Jest, JUnit) with proper mocking and assertion patterns, understanding both happy paths and error conditions through code structure analysis
vs alternatives: More efficient test generation than GPT-4 due to code-specific training; comparable quality to Copilot but with better support for integration tests and mock generation
Generates API documentation, docstrings, and README sections by analyzing code structure, function signatures, and type hints. The model produces documentation in multiple formats (Markdown, reStructuredText, JSDoc) with examples, parameter descriptions, return types, and usage patterns extracted from code context.
Unique: Analyzes code structure and type hints to generate documentation in multiple formats (Markdown, reStructuredText, JSDoc) with examples and parameter descriptions automatically extracted from function signatures
vs alternatives: More format-flexible than IDE docstring generators; faster and cheaper than Claude for bulk documentation generation due to sparse MoE efficiency
+4 more capabilities
Generates natural language responses mimicking Claude 3 Sonnet/Opus writing style through fine-tuning on Qwen2.5 72B base model. Uses instruction-tuned architecture to follow complex multi-step prompts while maintaining coherent, well-structured prose with appropriate tone and formality levels. The model learns stylistic patterns from Claude outputs during fine-tuning rather than using retrieval or prompt engineering alone.
Unique: Fine-tuned specifically on Claude 3 Sonnet/Opus output patterns rather than generic instruction-tuning, creating a style-matched alternative that preserves Anthropic's prose characteristics while running on Qwen2.5's 72B architecture
vs alternatives: Offers Claude-quality writing at lower cost than Anthropic's API and with more deployment flexibility than proprietary models, though with less transparency about training methodology than fully open-source alternatives like Llama
Maintains coherent multi-turn dialogue through transformer-based attention mechanisms that track conversation history and speaker context. The instruction-tuned architecture processes entire conversation threads as input, allowing the model to reference previous exchanges, maintain consistent character/tone, and resolve pronouns and references across turns without explicit memory structures.
Unique: Inherits Qwen2.5's instruction-tuning approach to conversation, which explicitly trains on multi-turn formats with clear role markers, enabling better context resolution than models trained primarily on single-turn examples
vs alternatives: Simpler integration than systems requiring external memory stores (RAG, vector DBs) since context is handled natively, but less sophisticated than models with explicit memory architectures or retrieval-augmented approaches for very long conversations
Magnum v4 72B scores higher at 25/100 vs Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Next at 24/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Generates code snippets and technical explanations by applying instruction-tuned patterns learned from fine-tuning on Claude outputs. The model understands code context from natural language descriptions, can generate multiple programming languages, and provides explanations alongside code. Implementation relies on transformer attention over code tokens and learned associations between natural language intent and code patterns.
Unique: Fine-tuned on Claude's code generation outputs, capturing Anthropic's approach to code explanation and safety considerations (e.g., error handling suggestions) rather than pure code-to-code translation
vs alternatives: Provides better code explanations and safety context than specialized code models like CodeLlama, but likely slower and less specialized than models fine-tuned specifically on code-only datasets
Applies learned chain-of-thought reasoning patterns from Claude fine-tuning to break down complex problems into steps. The model generates intermediate reasoning steps before final answers, using transformer attention to track logical dependencies across reasoning chains. This is achieved through instruction-tuning on examples where Claude explicitly shows reasoning work.
Unique: Inherits Claude's explicit chain-of-thought training approach, which emphasizes showing reasoning work as part of the output rather than reasoning internally, making reasoning patterns visible and auditable
vs alternatives: More transparent reasoning than models without explicit chain-of-thought training, but less specialized than models fine-tuned specifically on mathematical reasoning datasets or formal logic
Condenses long-form text into summaries while preserving key information, using attention mechanisms to identify salient content and instruction-tuned patterns for summary formatting. The model learns from Claude's summarization style, which emphasizes clarity and hierarchical organization of information. Works by attending to important tokens and generating compressed representations.
Unique: Fine-tuned on Claude's summarization outputs, which emphasize hierarchical structure and clear topic organization rather than extractive summarization, producing more readable abstracts
vs alternatives: Better prose quality and readability than extractive summarization tools, but less specialized than models fine-tuned specifically on summarization tasks or using dedicated abstractive architectures
Executes complex, multi-part instructions by parsing task structure and maintaining execution context across steps. The instruction-tuned architecture learns to identify task boundaries, handle conditional logic (if-then patterns), and sequence operations correctly. Implementation relies on transformer attention to track task state and learned patterns from Claude's instruction-following training.
Unique: Trained on Claude's instruction-following patterns, which emphasize explicit acknowledgment of task structure and step-by-step execution reporting, making task progress transparent
vs alternatives: More reliable instruction-following than base models without instruction-tuning, but less specialized than models with explicit task planning architectures or reinforcement learning from human feedback on instruction compliance
Answers questions by understanding context, identifying relevant information, and generating coherent responses. Uses transformer attention to locate answer-relevant tokens and instruction-tuned patterns to format responses appropriately. The model learns from Claude's question-answering style, which emphasizes accuracy, nuance, and acknowledgment of uncertainty.
Unique: Fine-tuned on Claude's QA outputs, which emphasize acknowledging uncertainty, providing nuanced answers, and explaining reasoning rather than simple factual retrieval
vs alternatives: Better answer quality and nuance than retrieval-based QA systems, but without external knowledge bases or web search, limited to training data knowledge unlike RAG-augmented systems
Generates creative text including stories, essays, marketing copy, and other original content by learning stylistic patterns from Claude's creative outputs. The model uses transformer attention to maintain narrative coherence, character consistency, and thematic development across generated text. Fine-tuning captures Claude's approach to balancing creativity with clarity.
Unique: Fine-tuned on Claude's creative outputs, which balance imaginative storytelling with clarity and coherence, producing more readable creative content than models trained purely on internet text
vs alternatives: Better prose quality and narrative coherence than base language models, but less specialized than models fine-tuned specifically on creative writing datasets or with explicit story structure training