| 0 |
| Quality | 0 | 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Starting Price | $2.20e-7 per prompt token | $1.05e-6 per prompt token |
| Capabilities | 12 decomposed | 13 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Qwen3-Coder uses a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture with 480B total parameters but only activates 35B parameters per inference token, enabling efficient code generation across multiple programming languages and paradigms. The sparse activation pattern routes different code patterns (e.g., API calls, data transformations, control flow) to specialized expert sub-networks, reducing latency and memory footprint compared to dense models while maintaining reasoning depth for complex coding tasks.
Unique: Uses 480B-parameter MoE with 35B active parameters per token, routing code patterns to specialized experts rather than using dense activation across all parameters. This sparse routing is implemented via learned gating networks that dynamically select expert combinations based on token context, enabling 10-15x parameter efficiency vs dense models while maintaining code quality.
vs alternatives: Achieves GPT-4-level code generation quality with 3-5x lower inference cost and latency compared to dense 480B models, while maintaining longer context windows than smaller dense alternatives like Codex or Copilot.
Qwen3-Coder natively supports structured function calling through a schema-based tool registry that binds natural language instructions to executable functions. The model generates function calls as structured JSON payloads that conform to OpenAPI/JSON Schema specifications, enabling seamless integration with external APIs, code execution environments, and multi-step agentic workflows without requiring prompt engineering or output parsing hacks.
Unique: Implements function calling through a learned schema-binding layer trained on diverse tool-use datasets, enabling the model to generate valid function calls without explicit prompt templates. The MoE architecture routes tool-calling patterns to specialized experts, improving accuracy and reducing hallucination compared to dense models that treat function calling as a generic text generation task.
vs alternatives: Generates valid function calls with higher accuracy than GPT-3.5 and comparable to GPT-4, while supporting longer tool descriptions and more complex multi-step workflows due to superior long-context handling.
Qwen3-Coder generates code that correctly uses external APIs, libraries, and frameworks by understanding their documentation, signatures, and usage patterns. The model generates correct API calls with proper parameter handling, error handling, and idiomatic usage patterns specific to each library or framework, reducing integration errors and accelerating development.
Unique: Generates API-correct code through MoE expert routing where library-specific experts specialize in different APIs and frameworks. The model learns to route API calls to experts trained on specific libraries, improving correctness and idiomatic usage compared to generic code generation.
vs alternatives: Generates more correct and idiomatic API usage than GPT-3.5, while maintaining comparable quality to GPT-4 at lower cost. Outperforms generic code generation by routing to library-specific experts.
Qwen3-Coder generates code from natural language instructions by decomposing complex tasks into intermediate reasoning steps, then generating code that implements each step. The model uses chain-of-thought reasoning to break down requirements, plan implementation approaches, and generate code that satisfies all specified constraints, with explicit reasoning traces explaining the generation process.
Unique: Implements instruction-following through explicit reasoning chains where the model decomposes requirements into steps, then routes each step to appropriate code generation experts. This enables more accurate satisfaction of complex constraints compared to single-pass generation.
vs alternatives: Generates code that more accurately satisfies complex multi-constraint specifications than GPT-4, while maintaining lower latency than multi-turn refinement approaches.
Qwen3-Coder supports extended context windows (up to 128K tokens or higher depending on deployment) enabling analysis and generation of code across entire repositories, large documentation sets, and multi-file codebases without chunking or summarization. The model uses efficient attention mechanisms (likely rotary position embeddings and sparse attention patterns) to maintain coherence over long sequences while the MoE architecture keeps memory footprint manageable.
Unique: Combines MoE sparse activation with efficient attention mechanisms to maintain 128K+ token context windows without proportional memory scaling. The sparse expert routing allows the model to selectively activate relevant code understanding experts based on file type and code patterns, rather than processing all context through dense layers.
vs alternatives: Handles 2-4x longer code contexts than GPT-4 Turbo while maintaining lower inference cost, enabling true repository-scale code understanding without chunking or summarization strategies.
Qwen3-Coder generates syntactically correct code across 30+ programming languages (Python, JavaScript, TypeScript, Java, C++, Go, Rust, C#, PHP, Swift, Kotlin, etc.) by routing language-specific patterns to dedicated expert sub-networks within the MoE architecture. The model learns language-specific syntax rules, idioms, and standard library patterns during training, enabling generation of idiomatic code that follows language conventions rather than generic pseudo-code.
Unique: Uses MoE expert routing to maintain language-specific sub-networks that specialize in syntax, idioms, and standard libraries for each language. Rather than treating all languages as equivalent text generation tasks, the gating network learns to route Python code patterns to Python experts, Rust patterns to Rust experts, etc., improving syntactic correctness and idiomatic quality.
vs alternatives: Generates more idiomatic and syntactically correct code across diverse languages than GPT-4, which treats all languages with equal weight. Outperforms language-specific models on cross-language tasks due to shared reasoning backbone.
Qwen3-Coder predicts the next tokens in a code sequence given a partial code context, supporting both single-line and multi-line completions. The model uses causal attention masking to ensure predictions only depend on preceding tokens, and the MoE architecture routes completion patterns (e.g., API method chains, control flow continuations) to specialized experts, enabling fast, accurate completions that respect code structure and semantics.
Unique: Implements completion through causal attention with MoE expert routing, where completion patterns (method chains, control flow, imports) are routed to specialized experts. This enables faster, more accurate completions than dense models because the gating network learns to activate only the experts relevant to the current code context.
vs alternatives: Achieves lower latency than Copilot for multi-line completions due to MoE sparse activation, while maintaining comparable or superior completion accuracy through specialized expert routing.
Qwen3-Coder generates natural language explanations of code functionality, generates docstrings and comments, and produces comprehensive documentation from source code. The model uses its code understanding capabilities to parse syntax and semantics, then generates human-readable explanations at multiple levels of abstraction (function-level, module-level, system-level) with optional formatting for Markdown, Sphinx, or JSDoc standards.
Unique: Leverages the model's code understanding from MoE expert routing to generate contextually-accurate explanations that respect code structure and semantics. The specialized code understanding experts enable the model to explain not just what code does, but why it's structured that way and what design patterns it uses.
vs alternatives: Produces more accurate and contextually-aware documentation than GPT-3.5 due to superior code understanding, while maintaining comparable quality to GPT-4 at lower cost.
+4 more capabilities
GLM-5.1 executes multi-step coding tasks over extended timeframes without requiring human intervention between steps, using an internal planning mechanism that decomposes complex objectives into sub-tasks and maintains execution state across sequential operations. Unlike minute-level interaction models that require prompting after each step, this capability enables the model to autonomously navigate decision trees, handle errors, and adapt strategy based on intermediate results without context resets.
Unique: Designed specifically for minute+ autonomous execution windows rather than single-turn interactions; maintains internal execution state and decision-making across extended task horizons without requiring external orchestration or re-prompting between steps
vs alternatives: Outperforms GPT-4 and Claude for long-horizon coding tasks because it's architected for continuous autonomous operation rather than stateless request-response cycles
GLM-5.1 generates and refactors code with awareness of the full codebase structure, dependencies, and patterns, using semantic understanding of how changes in one file propagate to others. The model analyzes import graphs, function signatures, and usage patterns across files to ensure generated code maintains consistency and doesn't introduce breaking changes, rather than treating each file in isolation.
Unique: Maintains semantic awareness of codebase structure and cross-file dependencies during generation, enabling it to make coordinated changes across multiple files rather than treating each file independently
vs alternatives: Produces more consistent multi-file refactorings than Copilot or Claude because it reasons about the entire codebase context simultaneously rather than file-by-file
Qwen: Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B scores higher at 24/100 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.1 at 24/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
GLM-5.1 diagnoses errors and bugs by analyzing error messages, stack traces, and code context to identify root causes and suggest fixes. The model correlates error symptoms with likely causes, explains why errors occur, and provides specific debugging steps or code fixes.
Unique: Diagnoses errors by correlating symptoms with root causes using semantic understanding of code and error patterns, providing explanations and fixes rather than just pattern matching
vs alternatives: More effective at diagnosing subtle bugs than search-based solutions because it reasons about code semantics and error causality
GLM-5.1 identifies performance bottlenecks in code and suggests optimizations with specific implementation guidance, analyzing algorithms, data structures, and resource usage to recommend improvements. The model understands performance implications of different approaches and can suggest algorithmic or architectural changes to improve efficiency.
Unique: Suggests optimizations based on algorithmic and architectural analysis rather than just code-level tweaks, understanding performance implications of different approaches
vs alternatives: Provides more meaningful performance guidance than generic LLMs because it understands algorithm complexity and can suggest structural improvements
GLM-5.1 analyzes code for security vulnerabilities including injection attacks, authentication/authorization issues, cryptographic weaknesses, and data exposure risks, providing specific remediation guidance. The model understands common vulnerability patterns and security best practices to identify risks and suggest secure implementations.
Unique: Identifies security vulnerabilities through semantic analysis of code patterns and provides remediation guidance based on security best practices, not just pattern matching against known CVEs
vs alternatives: More effective at finding context-specific security issues than SAST tools because it understands code intent and can suggest secure implementations
GLM-5.1 performs step-by-step reasoning about code behavior by internally simulating or tracing execution paths, allowing it to predict runtime behavior, identify bugs, and explain code logic without requiring actual execution. This capability uses chain-of-thought-like reasoning applied specifically to code semantics, tracking variable state, control flow, and function call sequences to reason about correctness.
Unique: Applies extended reasoning specifically to code semantics and execution paths, enabling it to predict runtime behavior and identify subtle bugs through symbolic execution simulation rather than pattern matching
vs alternatives: More effective at finding subtle logic bugs than GPT-4 because it explicitly traces execution state rather than relying on pattern recognition
GLM-5.1 maintains rich context across multiple conversation turns when working on code, remembering previous edits, design decisions, and constraints without requiring users to re-specify them. The model builds an internal model of the codebase state and user intent that persists across turns, enabling iterative refinement where each turn builds on previous work rather than starting fresh.
Unique: Maintains stateful context across turns specifically optimized for code collaboration, remembering design decisions and codebase state without explicit memory structures
vs alternatives: Provides better iterative code refinement than stateless models because it retains context about previous edits and design intent across turns
GLM-5.1 translates natural language specifications into code that preserves semantic intent, handling ambiguous or underspecified requirements by inferring reasonable implementations based on context and common patterns. The model uses semantic understanding of both natural language and code to bridge the gap between high-level intent and low-level implementation details.
Unique: Translates natural language to code with explicit semantic fidelity checking, inferring reasonable implementations for underspecified requirements rather than producing literal or incomplete code
vs alternatives: Handles ambiguous requirements better than Copilot because it uses semantic reasoning to infer intent rather than pattern matching against training data
+5 more capabilities