| 1 |
| Quality | 0 | 1 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 1 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Starting Price | $1.30e-7 per prompt token | $5/mo (Mini) |
| Capabilities | 11 decomposed | 14 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Processes images and video frames through a unified vision-language architecture that jointly encodes visual and textual information, enabling pixel-level understanding of visual content alongside semantic reasoning. The model uses a transformer-based visual encoder that maps image regions to token embeddings compatible with the language model's token space, allowing seamless interleaving of visual and textual reasoning in a single forward pass.
Unique: Unified 30B parameter architecture that jointly processes vision and language in a single model rather than using separate vision encoders, enabling tighter integration of visual and textual reasoning without separate API calls or model composition
vs alternatives: More efficient than stacked vision-language models (e.g., CLIP + LLM) because visual understanding is native to the model architecture, reducing latency and enabling more coherent cross-modal reasoning
The 'Thinking' variant implements an internal reasoning mechanism that generates intermediate reasoning steps before producing final outputs, particularly for STEM, mathematics, and logic-heavy visual analysis tasks. This approach uses a hidden reasoning token stream that explores multiple solution paths and validates hypotheses before committing to an answer, similar to process-based reward models but integrated into the forward pass.
Unique: Integrates extended reasoning directly into the model's forward pass for visual tasks, rather than using post-hoc prompting techniques like 'think step-by-step', enabling the model to allocate compute dynamically to reasoning-heavy visual problems
vs alternatives: More reliable than prompt-based chain-of-thought for visual reasoning because reasoning is baked into model weights, not dependent on prompt engineering; produces more consistent intermediate steps for STEM tasks
Analyzes images to identify potentially harmful, inappropriate, or policy-violating content including violence, explicit material, hate symbols, or other sensitive content. The model uses visual understanding to classify content safety and can generate explanations for why content may be flagged. It integrates safety classification into the visual reasoning pipeline without requiring separate moderation models.
Unique: Integrates safety classification into the core model rather than using post-hoc filtering, enabling more nuanced understanding of context and intent when evaluating content safety
vs alternatives: More contextually aware than rule-based or simple classifier-based moderation because it understands visual semantics and can explain moderation decisions, reducing false positives from literal pattern matching
Generates detailed, contextually-aware natural language descriptions of images and video frames by analyzing spatial relationships, object hierarchies, and semantic context. The model produces captions that go beyond simple object lists to include actions, relationships, and inferred intent, using attention mechanisms that weight different image regions based on semantic importance rather than just salience.
Unique: Generates semantically-aware captions that model spatial relationships and object interactions rather than just listing detected objects, using the language model's understanding of natural language structure to produce coherent narratives
vs alternatives: Produces more natural, human-like captions than traditional vision-only models (e.g., ViT-based captioning) because it leverages the language model's semantic understanding to structure descriptions contextually
Answers natural language questions about images by performing multi-step visual reasoning that may require identifying multiple objects, understanding relationships, and applying commonsense knowledge. The model uses attention mechanisms to ground question tokens to relevant image regions and iteratively refines its understanding through intermediate reasoning steps before generating answers.
Unique: Performs multi-hop reasoning by internally decomposing questions into sub-tasks and grounding each to relevant image regions, rather than using a single forward pass, enabling more complex reasoning about visual relationships
vs alternatives: More accurate on complex multi-hop VQA tasks than single-pass vision models because the reasoning variant explicitly explores multiple reasoning paths before committing to an answer
Extracts and recognizes text from images, including handwritten text, printed documents, and text embedded in scenes. The model uses visual understanding to identify text regions and language understanding to decode characters, handling multiple languages, fonts, and orientations. It preserves spatial layout information when extracting text from structured documents like forms or tables.
Unique: Combines visual understanding with language modeling to recognize text in context, rather than using traditional OCR engines, enabling better handling of ambiguous characters and contextual text understanding
vs alternatives: More robust to varied fonts, handwriting, and contextual text than traditional OCR engines (e.g., Tesseract) because it leverages language model understanding to disambiguate character recognition
Identifies and localizes objects within images by generating semantic labels and spatial coordinates (bounding boxes or region descriptions) for detected entities. The model uses visual attention to focus on relevant objects and language generation to produce structured descriptions of their locations and properties, without requiring explicit bounding box regression layers.
Unique: Performs object detection through language generation rather than regression heads, enabling flexible output formats and semantic understanding of object relationships without training specialized detection layers
vs alternatives: More flexible than traditional object detection models because it can describe object relationships and properties in natural language, but trades precision for semantic richness
Analyzes documents (scanned PDFs, forms, invoices, receipts) to extract structured information like fields, tables, and key-value pairs. The model understands document layout, identifies sections, and extracts relevant data while preserving context about relationships between fields. It uses visual understanding of document structure combined with language understanding to map visual elements to semantic categories.
Unique: Combines visual layout understanding with semantic field extraction, enabling the model to identify document structure and extract data contextually rather than using template-based or rule-based extraction
vs alternatives: More adaptable to document layout variations than rule-based extraction systems because it learns semantic relationships between visual elements and data fields, reducing need for template engineering
+3 more capabilities
Converts text prompts describing website requirements into complete, multi-page responsive website layouts with copy, images, and animations in seconds. The system ingests natural language descriptions (e.g., 'three unique landing pages in dark mode for a modern design startup'), processes them through an undisclosed LLM pipeline, and outputs design variations as editable React-compatible components in the visual editor. Generation appears to be single-pass without iterative refinement loops, producing immediately-editable designs rather than requiring approval workflows.
Unique: Generates complete multi-page websites with layout, copy, images, and animations from single text prompts, outputting directly into a Figma-quality visual editor where designs remain fully editable rather than locked outputs. Most competitors (Wix, Squarespace) use template selection; Framer generates custom layouts per prompt.
vs alternatives: Faster than hiring a designer and more customizable than template-based builders, but slower and less flexible than human designers for complex brand requirements.
Browser-based visual design interface with design-tool-grade capabilities including responsive layout editing, effects/interactions/animations, shader effects (Holo Shader, Chromatic Aberration, Logo Shaders), and real-time multi-user collaboration. The editor supports role-based permissions (viewers read-only, editors can modify), direct copy editing on published pages, and simultaneous editing by multiple team members. Built on React component architecture allowing both visual design and custom code insertion without leaving the editor.
Unique: Combines Figma-level visual design capabilities with direct website publishing and custom React component integration in a single tool, eliminating the designer→developer handoff. Includes proprietary shader effects library (Holo, Chromatic Aberration) not available in standard design tools. Real-time collaboration uses Framer's infrastructure rather than relying on external sync services.
More design-capable than Webflow (which prioritizes no-code logic) and more publishing-integrated than Figma (which requires export to separate hosting), but less feature-rich for complex interactions than Webflow's visual logic builder.
Framer scores higher at 82/100 vs Qwen: Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking at 23/100. Framer also has a free tier, making it more accessible.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Enables creation and management of website content in multiple languages with separate content variants per locale. Available as a Pro-tier add-on with undisclosed pricing. Allows content creators to maintain language-specific versions of pages, CMS items, and copy. Implementation details (language detection, URL structure, fallback behavior, supported languages) are not documented.
Unique: Integrates multi-language content management directly into the CMS and visual editor, allowing designers to manage language variants without external translation tools. Content structure is shared across languages; only content is localized.
vs alternatives: Simpler than Contentful with language variants because no separate content model configuration required, but less flexible for complex localization workflows or translation management.
Enables one-click rollback to previous website versions, allowing teams to quickly revert breaking changes or problematic updates. Available on Pro tier and above. Maintains version history of published sites with ability to restore any previous version. Implementation details (version retention policy, automatic snapshots, granular change tracking) are not documented.
Unique: Provides one-click rollback directly in the publishing interface without requiring Git or version control knowledge. Automatic version snapshots are created on each publish. Most website builders require manual backups or external version control; Framer includes it natively.
vs alternatives: Simpler than Git-based workflows for non-technical users, but less granular than Git for selective rollback of specific changes.
Provides a server-side API for programmatic access to Framer sites, CMS content, and site management operations. Listed in product updates but not documented in detail. Capabilities, authentication, rate limits, and supported operations are unknown. Likely enables external systems to read/write CMS data, trigger deployments, or manage site configuration.
Unique: Provides server-side API access to Framer sites and CMS, enabling external integrations and automation. Specific capabilities unknown due to lack of documentation, but likely enables content synchronization with external systems.
vs alternatives: Unknown without documentation, but likely enables deeper integrations than visual-only builders like Wix or Squarespace.
Enables password protection of individual pages or entire sites, restricting access to authorized users only. Available on Basic tier and above. Allows teams to share draft content or restricted pages with specific audiences without making them publicly accessible. Implementation details (password hashing, session management, per-page vs site-wide protection) are not documented.
Unique: Integrates password protection directly into the publishing interface without requiring external authentication services. Available on Basic tier, making it accessible to all users. Simple password-based approach is easier than OAuth or SAML for non-technical users.
vs alternatives: Simpler than OAuth-based authentication for quick access control, but less secure for sensitive data because password-based protection is weaker than multi-factor authentication.
Integrated content management system supporting collections (content types), items (individual records), and relational data linking across collections. The CMS supports dynamic filtering of content on pages, multi-locale content variants (Pro add-on), and auto-publish/staging workflows. Data is stored in Framer's infrastructure with tiered limits: 1 collection/1,000 items (Basic), 10 collections/2,500 items (Pro), 20 collections/10,000 items (Scale). Relational CMS (linking between collections) is Pro-tier and above. Content can be edited directly on published pages without rebuilding.
Unique: Integrates CMS directly into the visual editor with no separate admin interface, allowing designers to manage content structure and pages in one tool. Supports relational data linking between collections (Pro+) and direct on-page editing of published content without rebuilds. Most website builders separate CMS from design; Framer unifies them.
vs alternatives: Simpler than Contentful or Strapi for non-technical users because CMS structure is defined visually, but less flexible for complex data models or external integrations.
One-click publishing of websites to Framer-managed global CDN with automatic responsive optimization across devices. Supports custom domain connection (free .com on annual plans), Framer subdomains, staging environments (Pro+), instant rollback (Pro+), site redirects (Pro+), and password protection (Basic+). Hosting includes 20 CDN locations on Basic/Pro tiers and 300+ locations on Scale tier. Bandwidth limits are 10 GB (Basic), 100 GB (Pro), 200 GB (Scale) with $40 per 100 GB overage charges. Page limits are 30 (Basic), 150 (Pro), 300 (Scale) with $20 per 100 additional pages.
Unique: Integrates hosting, CDN, and staging directly into the design tool with one-click publishing, eliminating separate hosting provider setup. Automatic responsive optimization and global CDN distribution are built-in rather than requiring external services. Staging and rollback are native features, not add-ons.
vs alternatives: Simpler than Vercel/Netlify for non-technical users because no Git/CI-CD knowledge required, but less flexible for complex deployment pipelines or custom server logic.
+6 more capabilities