MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) ranks higher at 61/100 vs Reka Edge at 21/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | Reka Edge | MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Model | Dataset |
| UnfragileRank | 21/100 | 61/100 |
| Adoption | 0 |
| 1 |
| Quality | 0 | 1 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Starting Price | $1.00e-7 per prompt token | — |
| Capabilities | 6 decomposed | 11 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Accepts static images as input alongside text prompts and generates natural language descriptions, answers, or analysis. The model processes visual features through a vision encoder that extracts spatial and semantic information, then fuses this with text embeddings in a shared latent space before decoding text output. This enables tasks like image captioning, visual question answering, and scene understanding without separate image-to-text pipelines.
Unique: 7B parameter efficient architecture optimized for image understanding specifically, using a compact vision encoder that maintains competitive performance on visual reasoning tasks while reducing latency and inference cost compared to larger multimodal models (13B-70B range)
vs alternatives: Faster and cheaper inference than GPT-4V or Gemini Pro Vision for image understanding tasks while maintaining industry-leading accuracy on visual benchmarks, making it ideal for high-volume API-based image processing workflows
Processes video inputs by sampling key frames and maintaining temporal coherence across the sequence, allowing the model to understand motion, scene changes, and temporal relationships. The architecture extracts visual features from multiple frames and encodes temporal ordering information, enabling the model to answer questions about video content, summarize events, or track objects across time without requiring external video processing libraries.
Unique: Integrates temporal frame sampling directly into the model architecture rather than treating video as independent frames, allowing efficient understanding of motion and scene progression within a compact 7B parameter footprint
vs alternatives: More efficient than sending entire videos to GPT-4V or Claude while maintaining temporal coherence, and requires no external video processing pipeline or frame extraction preprocessing
Extracts text from images while maintaining spatial relationships and document structure, using the vision encoder to identify text regions and the language model to decode content while preserving layout information. This enables structured extraction from documents, forms, and screenshots without separate OCR engines, and the model understands context to correct misrecognitions based on semantic meaning.
Unique: Combines vision encoding with language model decoding to perform context-aware OCR that understands semantic meaning and can correct recognition errors based on document context, rather than pure character-level recognition
vs alternatives: More accurate than traditional OCR engines (Tesseract, Paddle-OCR) on complex documents because it understands semantic context, and requires no separate OCR library or preprocessing pipeline
Accepts an image and a natural language question, then generates an answer by reasoning about visual content. The model uses the vision encoder to extract relevant visual features, attends to regions of interest based on the question, and generates a response that demonstrates understanding of spatial relationships, object properties, and scene context. This enables open-ended visual reasoning without predefined answer categories.
Unique: Integrates attention mechanisms that focus on image regions relevant to the question, combined with language model reasoning to generate answers that demonstrate understanding of spatial and semantic relationships
vs alternatives: More efficient than GPT-4V for VQA tasks due to smaller parameter count and optimized vision encoder, while maintaining competitive accuracy on standard VQA benchmarks
Exposes image understanding capabilities through a stateless REST API that accepts HTTP requests with image payloads and returns JSON responses, enabling integration into batch processing pipelines, serverless functions, and distributed workflows. The API handles image encoding, model inference, and response serialization transparently, with support for concurrent requests and standard HTTP semantics (retries, timeouts, rate limiting).
Unique: Provides stateless REST API interface that abstracts away model complexity and infrastructure management, allowing developers to integrate multimodal understanding into any HTTP-capable application without SDK dependencies
vs alternatives: Simpler integration than self-hosted models (no GPU management, no containerization) and more flexible than language-specific SDKs because it works with any HTTP client in any programming language
The 7B parameter architecture is specifically optimized for inference speed through quantization, knowledge distillation, and efficient attention mechanisms, delivering sub-second response times on standard hardware. The model uses techniques like grouped query attention and optimized matrix operations to reduce computational overhead while maintaining accuracy, enabling real-time applications and high-throughput batch processing without requiring high-end GPUs.
Unique: 7B parameter size combined with architectural optimizations (grouped query attention, quantization, knowledge distillation) delivers industry-leading latency-to-accuracy ratio, enabling real-time inference without specialized hardware
vs alternatives: Significantly faster and cheaper than 13B-70B multimodal models while maintaining competitive accuracy, making it ideal for latency-sensitive and cost-conscious applications
Provides 2.5 million manually-annotated object instances across 330,000 images with dual segmentation encoding: polygon coordinates for precise boundary definition and RLE (run-length encoding) for efficient storage and computation. Each instance includes bounding box coordinates in [x, y, width, height] format, category label from 80 object classes, and instance-level unique identifiers enabling per-object tracking and evaluation. Annotations are structured in JSON format with hierarchical organization linking images to annotations to categories, supporting both dense object scenes and sparse single-object images.
Unique: Dual segmentation encoding (polygon + RLE) in single dataset enables both precise boundary analysis and efficient computational workflows; 2.5M instances across 330K images provides scale unmatched by contemporaneous datasets (ImageNet had ~1.2M images, PASCAL VOC had ~11K images)
vs alternatives: Larger and more densely annotated than PASCAL VOC (11K images, ~6 objects/image) and more task-diverse than ImageNet (classification-only); RLE encoding enables 10-100x faster mask loading than polygon-only formats
Provides keypoint annotations for all people in images using a standardized 17-joint skeleton model (head, shoulders, elbows, wrists, hips, knees, ankles) with (x, y, visibility) tuples per joint. Visibility flag indicates whether keypoint is annotated (1), occluded (0), or outside image bounds (0). Keypoints are linked to parent person instances via instance ID, enabling pose estimation evaluation at both individual and crowd-level scales. Annotations follow COCO Keypoints task specification with consistent coordinate system across all 330K images.
Unique: Standardized 17-joint skeleton with explicit visibility flags enables robust evaluation of pose estimation under occlusion; linked to instance segmentation masks allows joint-level accuracy analysis within person bounding boxes
MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) scores higher at 61/100 vs Reka Edge at 21/100. MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) also has a free tier, making it more accessible.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than OpenPose dataset (no visibility flags) and larger scale than Human3.6M (3.6M frames vs 330K images); visibility annotations enable explicit occlusion handling unlike MPII (which lacks visibility metadata)
COCO ecosystem includes community-created extensions (COCO-Stuff, COCO DensePose, COCO Panoptic) that extend base dataset with additional annotations while maintaining compatibility with COCO API and evaluation infrastructure. Extensions follow COCO format and evaluation standards, enabling seamless integration into existing pipelines. Community contributions are vetted and published as official COCO variants, ensuring quality and standardization. Variant creation process is documented, enabling researchers to create custom extensions.
Unique: Standardized extension process enables community contributions while maintaining compatibility; official variants (Stuff, DensePose, Panoptic) are vetted and published, ensuring quality and discoverability
vs alternatives: More extensible than fixed datasets; community variants enable specialized use cases without forking; standardized format prevents fragmentation unlike ad-hoc dataset variants
Provides 1.65 million image-caption pairs (5 captions × 330K images) with natural language descriptions written by human annotators. Each caption is a free-form English sentence describing objects, actions, and scene context without enforced length limits or structured templates. Captions are stored in JSON format linked to image IDs, enabling training of vision-language models for image captioning, visual question answering, and cross-modal retrieval. Multiple captions per image capture linguistic diversity and alternative descriptions of the same visual content.
Unique: 5 captions per image (vs 1 in most datasets) captures linguistic diversity and enables robust evaluation of caption generation variability; 1.65M caption-image pairs provide scale for training large vision-language models
vs alternatives: 5x more captions per image than Flickr30K (1 caption/image) enabling better linguistic diversity modeling; larger scale than Visual Genome (108K images) while maintaining natural language quality vs automated alt-text
Extends base 80 object categories with 91 additional 'stuff' categories (background materials, textures, regions like sky, grass, wall) enabling dense semantic segmentation of entire images. Stuff categories are annotated as pixel-level masks without instance boundaries — all sky pixels are labeled 'sky' regardless of continuity. COCO-Stuff combines instance segmentation (80 objects) with semantic segmentation (171 total categories including stuff), stored as single-channel PNG masks where pixel value encodes category ID. Enables panoptic segmentation evaluation combining instance and stuff predictions.
Unique: 171-category taxonomy combining 80 instance objects + 91 stuff categories enables panoptic segmentation in single dataset; pixel-level masks for stuff enable dense scene understanding without instance boundaries
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than ADE20K (150 categories) and larger scale than Cityscapes (5K images); unified instance+stuff annotation enables panoptic evaluation unlike separate semantic/instance datasets
Combines instance segmentation (80 object categories with boundaries) and semantic segmentation (171 stuff categories without boundaries) into single panoptic prediction task. Evaluation uses Panoptic Quality (PQ) metric decomposed into Segmentation Quality (SQ — IoU of matched predictions) and Recognition Quality (RQ — detection rate). Panoptic masks encode both category ID and instance ID, enabling evaluation of both 'what' (category) and 'which' (instance identity) predictions. Standardized evaluation protocol with server-side metric computation ensures consistent benchmarking across submissions.
Unique: Panoptic Quality metric with explicit SQ/RQ decomposition enables fine-grained analysis of segmentation vs recognition errors; unified instance+stuff evaluation in single task forces models to handle both prediction types efficiently
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than separate instance/semantic benchmarks; PQ metric better captures real-world scene understanding than independent metrics; standardized evaluation prevents metric gaming unlike custom evaluation scripts
Provides dense 2D-to-3D correspondence maps for human bodies, mapping each pixel in a person instance to a 3D human body model surface. Annotations include UV coordinates (parameterization of 3D body surface) and body part indices enabling pixel-level body surface understanding. DensePose enables training of models that predict where each image pixel corresponds to on a canonical 3D human body, useful for pose transfer, virtual try-on, and detailed human understanding. Available from 2020 dataset version onwards, extends keypoint annotations with dense surface coverage.
Unique: Dense 2D-to-3D surface correspondence enables pixel-level body understanding beyond skeleton keypoints; UV parameterization allows transfer of appearance and shape across different people and poses
vs alternatives: More detailed than keypoint-only annotations (17 joints vs millions of surface points); enables pose transfer unlike keypoint datasets; larger scale than DensePose-specific datasets
Provides standardized evaluation metrics for each task (Average Precision for detection, IoU for segmentation, OKS for keypoints, BLEU/METEOR/CIDEr for captions, PQ for panoptic) computed server-side on held-out test set. Leaderboard system accepts structured JSON result submissions in COCO format, validates format, computes metrics, and ranks submissions by primary metric. Evaluation infrastructure ensures consistent benchmarking across all submissions and prevents metric gaming through standardized computation. Metrics are task-specific: AP/AP50/AP75 for detection, mIoU for segmentation, OKS for keypoints, CIDEr for captions.
Unique: Server-side metric computation prevents metric gaming and ensures consistency; task-specific metrics (AP, OKS, CIDEr, PQ) are standardized across all submissions enabling fair comparison; public leaderboard provides transparency and reproducibility
vs alternatives: More rigorous than self-reported metrics (prevents cherry-picking); standardized evaluation prevents metric implementation variations unlike custom evaluation scripts; public leaderboard enables community comparison unlike proprietary benchmarks
+3 more capabilities