| Ecosystem |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 6 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Provides MCP tools that allow AI agents to evaluate their own outputs against developer-defined scoring rubrics. Agents can invoke evaluation endpoints that apply multi-dimensional scoring criteria (accuracy, relevance, completeness, etc.) to generated content, receiving structured feedback scores and reasoning. This enables agents to assess quality before returning results to users or triggering refinement loops.
Unique: Implements evaluation as an MCP tool that agents can invoke directly within their reasoning loop, enabling real-time self-assessment without external service calls or custom evaluation code. Uses structured rubric-based scoring rather than generic quality metrics.
vs alternatives: Unlike generic LLM-as-judge approaches, Root Signals provides MCP integration so agents can natively call evaluation within their planning process, and supports custom rubrics tailored to specific use cases rather than one-size-fits-all scoring.
Collects structured signals about agent execution (success/failure outcomes, evaluation scores, latency, token usage, error types) and logs them to a centralized signal store. Agents can emit signals at key decision points, and the system aggregates these signals to build performance profiles. This creates a telemetry foundation for understanding agent behavior patterns and identifying improvement opportunities.
Unique: Integrates signal collection directly into the MCP protocol layer, allowing agents to emit structured performance data as part of their normal execution without requiring separate logging infrastructure. Signals are typed and schema-validated, enabling reliable downstream analysis.
vs alternatives: Provides agent-native signal emission (vs. external log parsing or post-hoc analysis), with structured schemas that enable reliable aggregation and correlation — more precise than generic logging frameworks for agent-specific metrics.
Enables agents to use evaluation signals and performance data to automatically refine their behavior across multiple iterations. Agents can inspect their own evaluation results, identify failure patterns, and adjust their approach (prompts, tool selection, parameter tuning) before retrying tasks. The system tracks refinement iterations and measures improvement, creating a self-improving agent loop without human intervention.
Unique: Implements refinement as a closed-loop process where agents directly consume their own evaluation signals and adjust behavior autonomously, rather than requiring external orchestration or human intervention. Supports multiple refinement strategies (prompt adjustment, tool swapping, parameter tuning) within a unified framework.
vs alternatives: Unlike manual agent tuning or external optimization services, Root Signals enables agents to self-refine in real-time during execution, using their own evaluation signals as the feedback source — faster iteration and no external dependency.
Supports evaluation rubrics with multiple independent scoring dimensions (e.g., code correctness, readability, performance, security) where each dimension has its own scoring scale and criteria. Rubrics are defined as structured schemas that specify dimension names, scoring ranges, and evaluation instructions. The evaluation engine applies all dimensions to a single output and returns a multi-dimensional score vector, enabling nuanced quality assessment beyond single-metric scoring.
Unique: Provides a structured rubric schema system that allows developers to define evaluation dimensions declaratively, with built-in support for dimension weighting, scoring ranges, and per-dimension reasoning. Rubrics are composable and reusable across different agent tasks.
vs alternatives: More flexible than single-metric scoring systems and more structured than free-form LLM evaluation; enables precise quality assessment across multiple axes while maintaining interpretability through per-dimension scores and reasoning.
Exposes Root Signals evaluation and refinement capabilities as standard MCP tools that agents can discover and invoke like any other tool. The MCP integration layer handles tool schema definition, parameter validation, and response formatting, allowing agents to call evaluation and signal emission functions using their native tool-calling mechanisms. This enables seamless integration into existing agentic frameworks without custom glue code.
Unique: Implements Root Signals capabilities as first-class MCP tools with full schema support, allowing agents to discover and invoke evaluation/refinement functions through standard tool-calling mechanisms. Handles all MCP protocol details transparently.
vs alternatives: Provides native MCP integration vs. requiring custom adapters or wrapper code; agents can use Root Signals tools with the same interface as any other MCP tool, reducing integration friction.
Analyzes accumulated performance signals to identify patterns in agent behavior and automatically suggest or apply behavior adaptations. The system correlates evaluation scores, execution outcomes, and signal metadata to detect failure modes (e.g., 'agent fails on tasks with X characteristic'), then recommends behavior changes (prompt modifications, tool additions, parameter adjustments) to address identified patterns. Adaptations can be applied automatically or presented to developers for review.
Unique: Correlates multi-dimensional signals (evaluation scores, execution outcomes, metadata) to identify failure patterns and automatically generate behavior adaptation recommendations. Uses signal analysis rather than manual inspection to discover improvement opportunities.
vs alternatives: Moves beyond reactive evaluation to proactive pattern detection and adaptation recommendation; enables data-driven agent improvement without requiring developers to manually analyze execution logs.
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
Supabase scores higher at 42/100 vs Root Signals at 24/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities