| Ecosystem | 1 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Starting Price | — | $25/mo |
| Capabilities | 13 decomposed | 15 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Analyzes job descriptions across 10 weighted dimensions (skill match, compensation, growth, location, company stability, role fit, market demand, interview difficulty, timeline, and cultural alignment) to produce a normalized 1.0-5.0 score. Uses Claude Code with a shared scoring archetype system (_shared.md) that defines evaluation rubrics, enabling consistent A-F grade mapping across 740+ evaluations. The evaluation engine in oferta.md handles single JD analysis while ofertas.md performs comparative ranking across multiple opportunities.
Unique: Uses a shared archetype system (_shared.md) that encodes evaluation rubrics as reusable Claude prompts, enabling consistent scoring across 740+ evaluations without rebuilding evaluation logic per run. Implements weighted multi-dimensional scoring (10 dimensions) rather than simple keyword matching, producing nuanced A-F grades that account for compensation, growth, cultural fit, and interview difficulty simultaneously.
vs alternatives: More sophisticated than keyword-matching job boards (Indeed, LinkedIn) because it evaluates role fit across 10 weighted dimensions including compensation, growth trajectory, and cultural alignment; faster than manual evaluation because Claude Code processes JDs in parallel via batch-runner.sh orchestration.
Generates tailored resume PDFs for each target job description using a keyword-injection engine that maps JD requirements to candidate skills. The generate-pdf.mjs script processes CV HTML templates with embedded font assets, injects keywords extracted from the target JD, and outputs ATS-compliant PDFs. Uses a CV HTML template system with configurable fonts and styling, ensuring each PDF is customized for the specific role while maintaining ATS readability (no complex graphics, semantic HTML structure). The system produced 100+ tailored CVs during the original 740-evaluation search.
Unique: Implements keyword injection at the HTML template level before PDF rendering, allowing semantic keyword placement (e.g., injecting JD skills into relevant resume sections) rather than naive text replacement. Maintains a CV HTML template system with embedded fonts, enabling consistent styling across 100+ generated PDFs while preserving ATS compatibility (semantic HTML, no complex graphics).
vs alternatives: More targeted than generic resume builders (Canva, Indeed Resume) because it injects JD-specific keywords into each resume; faster than manual customization because generate-pdf.mjs batch-processes templates with keyword mapping in seconds rather than minutes per resume.
Manages candidate profile, job search preferences, and system configuration through YAML-based configuration files (config/profile.example.yml) and environment variables (.envrc). The profile system stores candidate skills, experience, education, and preferences (target roles, salary range, location constraints), which are referenced by all downstream skills (evaluation, resume generation, outreach). The configuration system enables users to customize evaluation weights, job board sources (portals.yml), and language preferences without modifying code. Profile templates (modes/_profile.template.md) enable quick setup for new users.
Unique: Uses YAML-based configuration files (profile.yml, portals.yml) and environment variables (.envrc) to enable users to customize evaluation criteria, job board sources, and candidate preferences without modifying code. Profile templates enable quick setup for new users.
vs alternatives: More flexible than hardcoded configuration because users can customize evaluation weights and job sources via YAML; more secure than environment variables alone because it separates sensitive data (API keys) from configuration (preferences).
Provides system health checks and data validation through utility scripts (doctor.mjs, verify-pipeline.mjs, cv-sync-check.mjs) that validate configuration, check API connectivity, verify data integrity, and ensure consistency between CV templates and application tracker. The doctor.mjs script performs comprehensive health checks (API keys, file permissions, required dependencies), while verify-pipeline.mjs validates the application tracker for missing data, inconsistent statuses, and orphaned records. cv-sync-check.mjs ensures that generated CVs match the current candidate profile.
Unique: Implements a suite of validation scripts (doctor.mjs, verify-pipeline.mjs, cv-sync-check.mjs) that perform comprehensive health checks and data integrity validation, treating system reliability as a first-class concern. Enables users to identify and fix issues before running large batch jobs.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than simple error logging because it proactively validates configuration and data; more actionable than generic error messages because it provides specific remediation suggestions.
Manages system versioning and updates through update-system.mjs script and VERSION file, enabling users to track system versions and apply updates safely. The update system checks for new releases, validates compatibility, and applies incremental updates to configuration files and scripts. Version tracking enables reproducibility (users can specify which version of career-ops was used for a job search) and enables rollback if updates introduce issues.
Unique: Implements version tracking and update management through update-system.mjs, enabling reproducible job searches and safe incremental updates. Enables users to track which system version was used for a specific job search, supporting reproducibility and debugging.
vs alternatives: More rigorous than ad-hoc updates because it validates compatibility and tracks versions; more transparent than automatic updates because users control when updates are applied and can rollback if needed.
Maintains a single source of truth for all job applications using a flat-file markdown database (data/applications.md) instead of a traditional database. The system includes three Node.js scripts: merge-tracker.mjs consolidates application data from multiple sources, dedup-tracker.mjs removes duplicate entries using fuzzy matching on company/role/date, and normalize-statuses.mjs standardizes status values (applied, interviewing, rejected, offer, etc.) across inconsistent user input. This architecture enables version control (Git history), human-readable data, and easy auditing without external dependencies.
Unique: Uses a flat-file markdown database (data/applications.md) as the single source of truth, enabling Git-based version control and human-readable auditing without external database dependencies. Implements a three-script pipeline (merge, dedup, normalize) that handles data consolidation from multiple sources, fuzzy-matching deduplication, and status standardization — treating data integrity as a first-class concern rather than an afterthought.
vs alternatives: More transparent than cloud-based trackers (Lever, Greenhouse) because the entire application history is version-controlled and human-readable; more reliable than spreadsheets because dedup-tracker.mjs and normalize-statuses.mjs automatically enforce consistency without manual cleanup.
Orchestrates large-scale job discovery and evaluation through a bash-based batch runner (batch-runner.sh) that processes multiple job sources in parallel. The system uses scan.md (Claude Code skill) to discover new roles from configured job portals (portals.yml), and batch-prompt.md as a worker template that applies evaluation logic to each discovered JD. The batch runner manages job queuing, parallel execution limits, and result aggregation, enabling processing of 100+ job postings in a single run. Results feed into the application tracker for downstream pipeline stages (apply, outreach, interview prep).
Unique: Implements a bash-based batch orchestrator (batch-runner.sh) that manages parallel Claude Code invocations with configurable concurrency limits and result aggregation, treating job discovery and evaluation as a unified pipeline rather than separate steps. Uses portals.yml as a declarative configuration for job sources, enabling users to add new job boards without modifying code.
vs alternatives: Faster than manual job board scraping because batch-runner.sh parallelizes evaluation across multiple JDs; more flexible than job board APIs because it uses Claude Code to parse arbitrary job posting formats; more cost-effective than commercial job aggregators because it leverages Claude's API pricing rather than per-job licensing.
Provides interview readiness through two mechanisms: (1) a story bank system that stores and retrieves candidate anecdotes indexed by skill/competency, enabling Claude to generate interview responses using relevant personal examples, and (2) pattern analysis scripts that extract recurring themes from past interviews and applications to identify weak areas. The interview-prep.md skill file orchestrates story retrieval, question generation, and response coaching. Pattern analysis scripts examine application tracker data to identify which skills/experiences correlate with positive outcomes, informing interview preparation focus areas.
Unique: Combines a manually-curated story bank (indexed by skill/competency) with pattern analysis of historical application outcomes to generate personalized interview coaching. Unlike generic interview prep tools, it uses the candidate's own experiences and success patterns to inform responses, making coaching contextual to their specific career trajectory.
vs alternatives: More personalized than generic interview prep platforms (Pramp, InterviewBit) because it uses the candidate's own story bank and historical success patterns; more comprehensive than simple question banks because it includes pattern analysis to identify weak areas and coaching feedback.
+5 more capabilities
Automatically inspects tabular data sources (Google Sheets, Airtable, Excel, CSV, SQL databases) to extract column names, infer field types (text, number, date, checkbox, etc.), and create bidirectional data bindings between UI components and source columns. Uses declarative component-to-column mappings that persist schema changes in real-time, enabling components to automatically reflect upstream data structure modifications without manual rebinding.
Unique: Glide's approach combines automatic schema introspection with declarative component binding, eliminating manual field mapping that competitors like Airtable require. The bidirectional sync model means changes to source column structure automatically propagate to UI components without developer intervention, reducing maintenance overhead for non-technical users.
vs alternatives: Faster to initial app than Airtable (which requires manual field configuration) and more flexible than rigid form builders because it adapts to evolving data structures automatically.
Provides 40+ pre-built, data-aware UI components (forms, tables, calendars, charts, buttons, text inputs, dropdowns, file uploads, maps, etc.) that automatically render responsively across mobile and desktop viewports. Components use a declarative binding syntax to connect to spreadsheet columns, with built-in support for computed fields, conditional visibility, and user-specific data filtering. Layout engine uses CSS Grid/Flexbox under the hood to adapt component sizing and positioning based on screen size without requiring manual breakpoint configuration.
Unique: Glide's component library is tightly integrated with data binding — components are not generic UI elements but data-aware objects that automatically sync with spreadsheet columns. This eliminates the disconnect between UI and data that exists in traditional form builders, where developers must manually wire component values to data sources.
vs alternatives: Faster to build than Bubble (which requires manual component-to-data wiring) and more mobile-optimized than Airtable's grid-centric interface, which prioritizes desktop spreadsheet metaphors over mobile-first design.
Glide scores higher at 70/100 vs career-ops at 49/100. career-ops leads on adoption and ecosystem, while Glide is stronger on quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Enables multiple team members to edit apps simultaneously with role-based access control. Supports predefined roles (Owner, Editor, Viewer) with different permission levels: Owners can manage team members and publish apps, Editors can modify app design and data, Viewers can only view published apps. Team member limits vary by plan (2 free, 10 business, custom enterprise). Real-time collaboration on app design is not mentioned, suggesting changes may not be synchronized in real-time between editors.
Unique: Glide's team collaboration is built into the platform, meaning team members don't need separate accounts or complex permission configuration — they're invited via email and assigned roles directly in the app. This is more seamless than tools requiring external identity management.
vs alternatives: More integrated than Airtable (which requires separate workspace management) and simpler than GitHub-based collaboration (which requires version control knowledge), though less sophisticated than enterprise platforms with audit logging and approval workflows.
Provides pre-built app templates for common use cases (inventory management, CRM, project management, expense tracking, etc.) that users can clone and customize. Templates include sample data, pre-configured components, and example workflows, reducing time-to-first-app from hours to minutes. Templates are fully editable, allowing users to modify data sources, components, and workflows to match their specific needs. Template library is curated by Glide and updated regularly with new templates.
Unique: Glide's templates are fully functional apps with sample data and workflows, not just empty scaffolds. This allows users to immediately see how components work together and understand app structure before customizing, reducing the learning curve significantly.
vs alternatives: More complete than Airtable's templates (which are mostly empty bases) and more accessible than building from scratch, though less flexible than code-based frameworks where templates can be parameterized and generated programmatically.
Allows workflows to be triggered on a schedule (daily, weekly, monthly, or custom intervals) without manual intervention. Scheduled workflows execute at specified times and can perform batch operations (process pending records, send daily reports, sync data, etc.). Execution time is in UTC, and the exact scheduling mechanism (cron, quartz, custom) is undocumented. Failed scheduled tasks may or may not retry automatically (retry logic undocumented).
Unique: Glide's scheduled workflows are integrated with the workflow engine, meaning scheduled tasks can execute the same complex logic as event-triggered workflows (conditional logic, multi-step actions, API calls). This is more powerful than simple scheduled email tools because scheduled tasks can perform data transformations and cross-system synchronization.
vs alternatives: More integrated than Zapier's schedule trigger (which is limited to simple actions) and more accessible than cron jobs (which require server access and scripting knowledge), though less transparent about execution guarantees and failure handling than enterprise job schedulers.
Offers Glide Tables, a proprietary managed database alternative to external spreadsheets or databases, with automatic scaling and optimization for Glide apps. Glide Tables are stored in Glide's infrastructure and optimized for the data binding and query patterns used by Glide apps. Scaling limits are plan-dependent (25k-100k rows), with separate 'Big Tables' tier for larger datasets (exact scaling limits undocumented). Automatic backups and disaster recovery are mentioned but details are undocumented.
Unique: Glide Tables are optimized specifically for Glide's data binding and query patterns, meaning they're tightly integrated with the app builder and don't require separate database administration. This is more seamless than connecting external databases (which require schema design and optimization knowledge) but less flexible because data is locked into Glide's proprietary format.
vs alternatives: More managed than self-hosted databases (no administration required) and more integrated than external databases (no separate configuration), though less portable than standard databases because data cannot be easily exported or migrated.
Provides basic chart components (bar, line, pie, area charts) that visualize data from connected sources. Charts are configured visually by selecting data columns for axes, values, and grouping. Charts are responsive and adapt to mobile/tablet/desktop. Real-time updates are supported; charts refresh when underlying data changes. No custom chart types or advanced visualization options (3D, animations, etc.) are available.
Unique: Provides basic chart components with automatic real-time updates and responsive design, suitable for simple dashboards — most visual builders (Bubble, FlutterFlow) require chart plugins or custom code
vs alternatives: More integrated than Airtable's chart view because real-time updates are automatic; weaker than BI tools (Tableau, Looker) because no drill-down, filtering, or advanced visualization options
Allows users to query data using natural language (e.g., 'Show me all orders from last month with revenue > $5k') which is converted to structured database queries without SQL knowledge. Also includes AI-powered data extraction from unstructured text (emails, documents, images) to populate spreadsheet columns. Implementation details (LLM model, context window, fine-tuning approach) are undocumented, but the feature appears to use prompt-based query generation with fallback to manual query building if AI fails.
Unique: Glide's natural language query feature bridges the gap between spreadsheet users (who think in English) and database queries (which require SQL). Rather than teaching users SQL, it translates natural language to structured queries, lowering the barrier to data exploration. The data extraction capability extends this to unstructured sources, automating data entry from emails and documents.
vs alternatives: More accessible than Airtable's formula language or traditional SQL, and more integrated than bolt-on AI query tools because it's built directly into the data layer rather than as a separate search interface.
+7 more capabilities