| 0 |
| Quality | 0 | 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Starting Price | $4.00e-8 per prompt token | $1.05e-6 per prompt token |
| Capabilities | 5 decomposed | 13 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Processes multi-turn conversations with context awareness, maintaining coherent dialogue state across exchanges while dynamically adapting persona and tone based on user-defined roleplay scenarios. Implements attention-based context windowing to balance memory retention with computational efficiency, using a merged model architecture that combines specialized roleplay weights with general reasoning capabilities.
Unique: Strategic model merge combining Llama 3 8B base with specialized roleplay and logic weights, enabling balanced performance across creative dialogue and factual reasoning without separate model switching — implemented via weighted layer interpolation rather than ensemble inference
vs alternatives: Smaller footprint than 70B generalists while maintaining roleplay quality through targeted model merging, making it faster and cheaper to deploy than full-size models while outperforming single-purpose roleplay models on general knowledge tasks
Generates original narrative, dialogue, and creative content while maintaining logical coherence and factual grounding through a merged architecture that balances creative weights with reasoning-focused model components. Uses attention mechanisms trained on diverse creative and technical corpora to produce contextually appropriate outputs that avoid logical contradictions within generated text.
Unique: Model merge architecture explicitly weights logic-focused components alongside creative weights, enabling the 8B model to maintain narrative consistency that typically requires larger models — achieved through selective layer interpolation favoring reasoning pathways during creative generation
vs alternatives: Outperforms pure creative models on logical consistency and outperforms pure reasoning models on creative flair, making it ideal for applications requiring both without model switching overhead
Answers factual and conceptual questions across diverse domains by leveraging Llama 3's broad training data combined with merged reasoning-optimized weights that improve logical inference and explanation quality. Processes queries through attention mechanisms trained on educational and technical content, generating structured explanations that break down complex topics into understandable components.
Unique: Merged architecture combines Llama 3's broad knowledge base with reasoning-optimized weights that improve explanation quality and logical inference — enables smaller 8B model to provide reasoning comparable to larger generalists through selective weight interpolation favoring inference pathways
vs alternatives: Smaller and faster than 70B reasoning models while maintaining explanation quality through targeted merging, making it cost-effective for high-volume Q&A applications where inference speed matters
Executes complex multi-step instructions by decomposing tasks into logical sub-steps, maintaining state across steps, and adapting execution based on intermediate results. Uses transformer attention to track task context and instruction dependencies, with merged weights optimizing for instruction comprehension and sequential reasoning rather than pure generation.
Unique: Merged model weights optimize for instruction comprehension and sequential reasoning, enabling the 8B model to decompose complex tasks more reliably than base Llama 3 — achieved through interpolating weights from instruction-tuned models while preserving general knowledge
vs alternatives: More instruction-aware than base Llama 3 while remaining smaller and faster than 70B instruction-tuned models, making it suitable for latency-sensitive applications requiring reliable task decomposition
Provides model access through OpenRouter's managed API infrastructure, supporting both streaming (token-by-token) and buffered responses with configurable sampling parameters (temperature, top-p, frequency penalty). Handles request routing, load balancing, and fallback logic transparently, allowing developers to integrate the model without managing infrastructure or GPU allocation.
Unique: Accessed exclusively through OpenRouter's managed API rather than direct model weights, providing transparent load balancing, provider routing, and infrastructure abstraction — developers interact with standardized OpenRouter API format rather than model-specific interfaces
vs alternatives: Eliminates infrastructure management overhead compared to self-hosted Llama 3, while offering lower cost and faster inference than larger proprietary models like GPT-4, making it ideal for cost-conscious teams needing reliable API access
GLM-5.1 executes multi-step coding tasks over extended timeframes without requiring human intervention between steps, using an internal planning mechanism that decomposes complex objectives into sub-tasks and maintains execution state across sequential operations. Unlike minute-level interaction models that require prompting after each step, this capability enables the model to autonomously navigate decision trees, handle errors, and adapt strategy based on intermediate results without context resets.
Unique: Designed specifically for minute+ autonomous execution windows rather than single-turn interactions; maintains internal execution state and decision-making across extended task horizons without requiring external orchestration or re-prompting between steps
vs alternatives: Outperforms GPT-4 and Claude for long-horizon coding tasks because it's architected for continuous autonomous operation rather than stateless request-response cycles
GLM-5.1 generates and refactors code with awareness of the full codebase structure, dependencies, and patterns, using semantic understanding of how changes in one file propagate to others. The model analyzes import graphs, function signatures, and usage patterns across files to ensure generated code maintains consistency and doesn't introduce breaking changes, rather than treating each file in isolation.
Unique: Maintains semantic awareness of codebase structure and cross-file dependencies during generation, enabling it to make coordinated changes across multiple files rather than treating each file independently
vs alternatives: Produces more consistent multi-file refactorings than Copilot or Claude because it reasons about the entire codebase context simultaneously rather than file-by-file
Z.ai: GLM 5.1 scores higher at 24/100 vs Sao10K: Llama 3 8B Lunaris at 21/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
GLM-5.1 diagnoses errors and bugs by analyzing error messages, stack traces, and code context to identify root causes and suggest fixes. The model correlates error symptoms with likely causes, explains why errors occur, and provides specific debugging steps or code fixes.
Unique: Diagnoses errors by correlating symptoms with root causes using semantic understanding of code and error patterns, providing explanations and fixes rather than just pattern matching
vs alternatives: More effective at diagnosing subtle bugs than search-based solutions because it reasons about code semantics and error causality
GLM-5.1 identifies performance bottlenecks in code and suggests optimizations with specific implementation guidance, analyzing algorithms, data structures, and resource usage to recommend improvements. The model understands performance implications of different approaches and can suggest algorithmic or architectural changes to improve efficiency.
Unique: Suggests optimizations based on algorithmic and architectural analysis rather than just code-level tweaks, understanding performance implications of different approaches
vs alternatives: Provides more meaningful performance guidance than generic LLMs because it understands algorithm complexity and can suggest structural improvements
GLM-5.1 analyzes code for security vulnerabilities including injection attacks, authentication/authorization issues, cryptographic weaknesses, and data exposure risks, providing specific remediation guidance. The model understands common vulnerability patterns and security best practices to identify risks and suggest secure implementations.
Unique: Identifies security vulnerabilities through semantic analysis of code patterns and provides remediation guidance based on security best practices, not just pattern matching against known CVEs
vs alternatives: More effective at finding context-specific security issues than SAST tools because it understands code intent and can suggest secure implementations
GLM-5.1 performs step-by-step reasoning about code behavior by internally simulating or tracing execution paths, allowing it to predict runtime behavior, identify bugs, and explain code logic without requiring actual execution. This capability uses chain-of-thought-like reasoning applied specifically to code semantics, tracking variable state, control flow, and function call sequences to reason about correctness.
Unique: Applies extended reasoning specifically to code semantics and execution paths, enabling it to predict runtime behavior and identify subtle bugs through symbolic execution simulation rather than pattern matching
vs alternatives: More effective at finding subtle logic bugs than GPT-4 because it explicitly traces execution state rather than relying on pattern recognition
GLM-5.1 maintains rich context across multiple conversation turns when working on code, remembering previous edits, design decisions, and constraints without requiring users to re-specify them. The model builds an internal model of the codebase state and user intent that persists across turns, enabling iterative refinement where each turn builds on previous work rather than starting fresh.
Unique: Maintains stateful context across turns specifically optimized for code collaboration, remembering design decisions and codebase state without explicit memory structures
vs alternatives: Provides better iterative code refinement than stateless models because it retains context about previous edits and design intent across turns
GLM-5.1 translates natural language specifications into code that preserves semantic intent, handling ambiguous or underspecified requirements by inferring reasonable implementations based on context and common patterns. The model uses semantic understanding of both natural language and code to bridge the gap between high-level intent and low-level implementation details.
Unique: Translates natural language to code with explicit semantic fidelity checking, inferring reasonable implementations for underspecified requirements rather than producing literal or incomplete code
vs alternatives: Handles ambiguous requirements better than Copilot because it uses semantic reasoning to infer intent rather than pattern matching against training data
+5 more capabilities