| 0 |
| 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 8 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Implements the Model Context Protocol (MCP) as a standardized interface for web scraping operations, allowing LLM agents and applications to invoke scraping capabilities through a schema-based tool registry. The MCP server exposes scraping functions as callable tools with JSON-RPC 2.0 transport, enabling seamless integration with Claude, other LLMs, and MCP-compatible clients without custom API wrappers.
Unique: Implements scraping as a first-class MCP tool rather than wrapping an existing REST API, enabling native integration with LLM function-calling systems and eliminating the need for custom tool adapters
vs alternatives: Provides standardized tool-calling interface for scraping across all MCP-compatible LLMs, whereas REST-based scrapers require individual client implementations for each LLM provider
Accepts CSS selectors, XPath expressions, or declarative extraction schemas to target and extract specific HTML elements from web pages. The extraction engine parses the DOM, applies selector queries, and transforms matched elements into structured output, supporting both single-element and multi-element (list) extraction patterns with optional data transformation rules.
Unique: Provides declarative extraction schemas that can be defined and reused through MCP tool calls, allowing LLM agents to dynamically generate extraction rules without requiring pre-built scraper code
vs alternatives: Simpler than Puppeteer/Playwright for static content extraction because it uses lightweight DOM parsing instead of full browser automation, reducing memory overhead and execution time
Orchestrates a multi-step pipeline that fetches a website, parses its HTML structure, applies extraction rules, and outputs structured datasets in formats like JSON or CSV. The pipeline handles URL normalization, response caching, error recovery, and format conversion, abstracting away the complexity of coordinating fetch, parse, extract, and serialize operations.
Unique: Exposes the entire scraping pipeline as a single MCP tool call, allowing LLM agents to request 'turn this website into a dataset' without orchestrating individual fetch/parse/extract steps
vs alternatives: More accessible than building custom Scrapy spiders because it requires only URL and extraction rules, whereas Scrapy requires Python code and project scaffolding
Leverages the LLM's understanding of natural language to automatically generate CSS selectors or extraction schemas from human-readable descriptions of desired data. When an LLM agent receives a scraping request, it can interpret the intent (e.g., 'extract product names and prices') and generate appropriate selectors without pre-defined templates, enabling adaptive scraping for novel websites.
Unique: Enables the LLM to generate scraping rules on-the-fly rather than relying on pre-built templates, allowing agents to handle novel websites and adapt to structural changes without human intervention
vs alternatives: More flexible than fixed-template scrapers because it uses the LLM's reasoning to understand page structure, whereas template-based systems require manual rule creation for each new website
Enables LLM agents to autonomously navigate multi-page websites by reasoning about pagination patterns, generating next-page URLs, and iteratively scraping content across pages. The agent can detect pagination links, follow them, and consolidate results from multiple pages into a single dataset, handling common pagination patterns (numbered pages, 'next' buttons, infinite scroll detection).
Unique: Delegates pagination logic to the LLM agent's reasoning rather than implementing fixed pagination patterns, allowing the agent to adapt to novel pagination schemes and handle edge cases
vs alternatives: More adaptive than Scrapy pagination middleware because the LLM can reason about pagination intent, whereas Scrapy requires explicit rule definitions for each pagination pattern
Implements a caching layer that stores fetched page content and extracted datasets, preventing redundant requests to the same URLs and avoiding duplicate data in output. The cache is keyed by URL and extraction parameters, allowing subsequent requests for the same content to return cached results with configurable TTL and invalidation strategies.
Unique: Provides transparent caching at the MCP tool level, allowing agents to benefit from deduplication without explicit cache management logic in their code
vs alternatives: Simpler than implementing custom caching in agent code because caching is handled transparently by the MCP server, reducing agent complexity
Implements automatic retry mechanisms for failed requests with exponential backoff, handling transient network errors, rate limiting (HTTP 429), and server errors (5xx). The system tracks retry attempts, applies increasing delays between retries, and provides detailed error reporting to the agent, allowing graceful degradation when scraping fails.
Unique: Integrates retry logic at the MCP server level, allowing agents to treat scraping as reliable without implementing their own retry loops, while respecting rate limits transparently
vs alternatives: More transparent than agent-level retry logic because failures are handled automatically, whereas agents using raw HTTP clients must implement retry logic themselves
Validates extracted data against a defined schema, ensuring that extracted fields match expected types, formats, and constraints. The validation engine checks data types (string, number, date), required fields, value ranges, and custom validation rules, providing detailed error reports for invalid data and optionally filtering or transforming invalid records.
Unique: Provides schema-based validation as a built-in MCP tool, allowing agents to validate extracted data without external validation libraries or custom code
vs alternatives: More integrated than post-processing validation because it validates data immediately after extraction, catching errors early in the pipeline
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
Supabase scores higher at 42/100 vs Scrapezy at 21/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities