| 0 |
| 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 10 decomposed | 10 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Analyzes npm and PyPI packages at the bytecode and AST level to detect obfuscated code, hidden install scripts, and suspicious patterns that static analysis alone would miss. Uses multi-layered inspection combining AST parsing, string deobfuscation, and behavioral pattern matching to identify malicious payloads before installation.
Unique: Uses multi-stage AST and bytecode analysis combined with behavioral heuristics to detect obfuscated payloads and install-time attacks that simpler regex or signature-based tools miss; maintains a continuously updated threat database of known malicious patterns across npm and PyPI ecosystems
vs alternatives: Deeper than npm audit (which only checks known CVEs) and more comprehensive than Snyk (which focuses on known vulnerabilities rather than zero-day obfuscation detection)
Identifies packages that mimic legitimate library names through character substitution, homoglyph attacks, or namespace confusion (e.g., 'lodash' vs 'lodash-es' vs 'lodash_es'). Uses edit-distance algorithms and visual similarity scoring combined with reputation analysis to flag suspicious package names before they're installed.
Unique: Combines edit-distance algorithms with visual similarity scoring and reputation analysis to detect both character-substitution typosquats and namespace-confusion attacks; maintains a curated list of known legitimate packages to establish baseline for comparison
vs alternatives: More sophisticated than simple string matching — detects visual homoglyphs and namespace confusion that basic typo checkers miss
Scans package source code and dependencies for embedded telemetry, analytics, and tracking code that phones home without explicit user consent. Identifies API calls to analytics services, beacon URLs, and data exfiltration patterns by analyzing network calls and data serialization in package code.
Unique: Performs static analysis of network calls and data serialization patterns to identify telemetry infrastructure; maintains a database of known analytics and tracking services to flag suspicious outbound connections in package code
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than license scanning — actively detects privacy violations rather than just checking licensing compliance
Verifies package authenticity by analyzing publisher identity, publication history, and behavioral patterns to detect account hijacking or impersonation. Tracks publisher reputation across versions, flags sudden changes in maintainer identity, and identifies packages published by newly-created accounts with suspicious characteristics.
Unique: Analyzes temporal patterns in publisher behavior and account metadata to detect account takeovers; maintains reputation scores that degrade when suspicious activity is detected, allowing detection of compromises that don't involve code changes
vs alternatives: Detects compromised accounts even when malicious code isn't present — catches supply chain attacks at the publisher level before malicious code is injected
Analyzes entire dependency trees (including transitive dependencies) to calculate cumulative risk scores and identify high-risk paths through the dependency graph. Uses graph traversal to find all packages reachable from direct dependencies and flags if any transitive dependency introduces unacceptable risk.
Unique: Performs full dependency graph traversal with risk propagation to identify high-risk paths; provides remediation suggestions by finding alternative dependency versions that reduce overall tree risk
vs alternatives: Goes beyond npm audit's CVE checking to analyze the entire dependency tree for zero-day risks and behavioral anomalies, not just known vulnerabilities
Integrates with CI/CD pipelines (GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Jenkins) to automatically block pull requests or deployments if dependencies violate configurable security policies. Enforces rules like 'no packages with risk score >50' or 'no packages from new publishers' and provides detailed reports in PR comments.
Unique: Provides native integrations with major CI/CD platforms with customizable policy engines; generates human-readable PR comments that educate developers about security risks rather than just blocking silently
vs alternatives: More actionable than generic security scanning tools — provides specific remediation suggestions and integrates directly into developer workflows
Continuously monitors installed packages for newly-discovered vulnerabilities and behavioral anomalies, pushing alerts in real-time via webhooks or email. Uses a streaming architecture to detect when a previously-safe package becomes compromised and notifies teams immediately rather than waiting for scheduled scans.
Unique: Uses streaming architecture with real-time threat intelligence feeds to detect newly-compromised packages within minutes of discovery; integrates with incident response platforms via webhooks
vs alternatives: Faster than scheduled vulnerability scans — detects zero-day supply chain attacks in real-time rather than waiting for daily/weekly scans
Analyzes package licenses and legal metadata to flag compliance risks, GPL/AGPL contamination, and incompatible license combinations. Identifies packages with restrictive licenses that may conflict with your project's licensing model and provides remediation suggestions.
Unique: Combines license metadata analysis with legal risk assessment to identify not just license types but also compatibility conflicts and contamination risks; provides alternative package suggestions with compatible licenses
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than simple license scanners — detects transitive license contamination and provides remediation suggestions
+2 more capabilities
Aggregates 67 TB of source code from the Software Heritage archive, filtering for permissively licensed repositories (MIT, Apache 2.0, BSD, etc.) across 600+ programming languages. Uses automated license detection and validation to ensure legal compliance for model training. Implements a rigorous deduplication pipeline at file and repository levels to eliminate redundant training data and reduce dataset bloat.
Unique: Largest open-source code dataset at 67 TB with automated opt-out governance allowing repository owners to request removal, combined with rigorous deduplication and PII removal pipeline — no other public dataset offers this scale with legal compliance and community control mechanisms
vs alternatives: Larger and more legally compliant than GitHub's CodeSearchNet (14M files) or Google's BigQuery public datasets, with explicit opt-out governance vs. implicit inclusion, and covers 600+ languages vs. Codex training data's undisclosed language distribution
Implements a community-driven opt-out system where repository owners can request removal of their code from the dataset without legal takedown notices. Maintains a registry of excluded repositories and re-applies exclusions during dataset updates. Provides transparent governance documentation and a clear submission process for removal requests, balancing open access with creator rights.
Unique: First large-scale code dataset to implement opt-out governance at dataset level rather than relying solely on license compliance, with transparent registry and community submission process — shifts power from dataset creators to code contributors
vs alternatives: More respectful of creator autonomy than GitHub Copilot's training approach (no opt-out) or academic datasets (one-time snapshot), and more scalable than individual DMCA takedowns
The Stack v2 scores higher at 61/100 vs Socket.dev at 55/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Automated pipeline that scans source code for personally identifiable information (email addresses, API keys, SSH keys, credit card patterns, phone numbers) and removes or redacts them before dataset release. Uses regex patterns, entropy-based detection for secrets, and heuristic rules to identify sensitive data. Operates at file level with configurable sensitivity thresholds to balance data utility against privacy risk.
Unique: Combines regex pattern matching, entropy-based secret detection, and heuristic rules in a unified pipeline with configurable sensitivity — more comprehensive than simple regex-only approaches, but trades off false positive rate against security coverage
vs alternatives: More thorough than GitHub's secret scanning (which only flags known patterns) because it includes entropy-based detection for unknown secret formats, but less accurate than specialized tools like TruffleHog due to language-agnostic approach
Indexes 67 TB of source code across 600+ programming languages with language-aware metadata (syntax, file extension, language family). Enables retrieval by language, license, repository, or code patterns. Uses Software Heritage's existing indexing infrastructure as foundation, augmented with language detection and classification. Supports both bulk download and filtered queries for specific language subsets.
Unique: Leverages Software Heritage's existing language detection and indexing infrastructure, then augments with BigCode-specific language classification and filtering — avoids reinventing language detection while providing dataset-specific query capabilities
vs alternatives: More comprehensive language coverage (600+ languages) than GitHub's Linguist (500+ languages) and more accessible than Software Heritage's raw API because it's pre-filtered for permissive licenses and deduplicated
Removes duplicate code files and repositories using content hashing (SHA-256 or similar) and fuzzy matching for near-duplicates. Operates in two stages: exact deduplication via hash matching, then fuzzy matching (e.g., Jaccard similarity or MinHash) to catch semantically identical code with minor formatting differences. Preserves one canonical copy of each unique code pattern while removing redundant training examples.
Unique: Two-stage deduplication combining exact hash matching with fuzzy similarity matching (likely MinHash or Jaccard) to catch both identical and near-identical code — more thorough than single-stage approaches but computationally expensive
vs alternatives: More aggressive deduplication than CodeSearchNet (which uses simple hash matching) because it catches near-duplicates, but less semantic than clone detection tools (which understand code structure) because it's content-based
Integrates with Software Heritage's comprehensive archive of 200+ million repositories and their full version control history. Extracts source code snapshots from Software Heritage's Git/Mercurial/SVN repositories, preserving repository metadata (commit history, author info, timestamps). Provides access to code at specific points in time, enabling historical analysis or training on code evolution patterns.
Unique: Leverages Software Heritage's universal code archive (200M+ repositories) as data source, providing access to code that would be impossible to collect via GitHub API alone — enables training on archived/deleted repositories and non-GitHub platforms (GitLab, Gitea, etc.)
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than GitHub-only datasets because it includes code from GitLab, Gitea, SourceForge, and other platforms archived by Software Heritage; more legally defensible than web scraping because it uses an established, community-maintained archive
Tracks and validates SPDX license identifiers for each repository, ensuring only permissively licensed code (MIT, Apache 2.0, BSD, etc.) is included. Maintains license metadata alongside code files, enabling downstream users to verify legal compliance. Implements license hierarchy and compatibility checking to handle dual-licensed or complex licensing scenarios.
Unique: Combines automated SPDX detection with manual review and maintains license metadata alongside code, enabling downstream users to verify compliance — more transparent than datasets that simply claim 'permissive licenses' without proof
vs alternatives: More legally rigorous than GitHub's CodeSearchNet (which doesn't validate licenses) and more transparent than Codex training data (which doesn't disclose license filtering at all)
Maintains versioned snapshots of the dataset (e.g., v2.0, v2.1) with documented changes between versions (new repositories added, deduplication improvements, PII removal updates). Provides checksums and manifests for reproducibility, enabling researchers to cite specific dataset versions and reproduce results. Tracks dataset lineage and transformation history.
Unique: Maintains semantic versioning and detailed changelogs for dataset releases, enabling researchers to cite specific versions and understand dataset evolution — more rigorous than one-off dataset releases without versioning
vs alternatives: More reproducible than academic datasets that are released once without versioning, and more transparent than commercial datasets (Codex) that don't disclose version history or changes
+2 more capabilities