Qwen 2.5 Coder (1.5B, 3B, 7B, 32B) ranks higher at 23/100 vs Solar (10.7B) at 20/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | Solar (10.7B) | Qwen 2.5 Coder (1.5B, 3B, 7B, 32B) |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Model | Model |
| UnfragileRank | 20/100 | 23/100 |
| Adoption | 0 | 0 |
| Quality | 0 |
| 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 1 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 5 decomposed | 11 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Generates contextually relevant text responses to user prompts using a Transformer architecture with Depth Up-Scaling (DUS) technique that integrates Mistral 7B weights into upscaled Llama 2 layers. Processes input via standard chat message format (role/content fields) and outputs coherent text completions optimized for single-turn interactions without multi-turn conversation state management. Inference is performed locally via Ollama runtime or cloud-hosted via Ollama Cloud with GPU acceleration.
Unique: Uses Depth Up-Scaling (DUS) technique to integrate Mistral 7B weights into upscaled Llama 2 architecture, achieving claimed state-of-the-art performance for models under 30B parameters without requiring larger model sizes or additional training compute. Distributed via Ollama as quantized 6.1GB artifact enabling local execution without cloud dependencies.
vs alternatives: Smaller than Mixtral 8X7B (56B) and other 30B+ models while claiming superior instruction-following performance, making it ideal for resource-constrained deployments; faster inference than larger models with comparable quality on single-turn tasks.
Executes the Solar model entirely on local hardware through Ollama's runtime environment, supporting multiple interface patterns: CLI commands, REST API endpoints on localhost:11434, and language-specific SDKs (Python `ollama` package, JavaScript `ollama` npm package). Model weights are stored as quantized GGUF format (6.1GB artifact) and loaded into memory for inference without transmitting data to external servers, enabling offline-first operation and zero API latency.
Unique: Ollama abstracts away GGUF quantization format handling and GPU/CPU dispatch logic behind unified CLI and REST API interfaces, allowing developers to swap models without code changes. Supports streaming responses via Server-Sent Events (SSE) for real-time token generation without waiting for full completion.
vs alternatives: Simpler deployment than vLLM or TensorRT-LLM for single-model serving; more accessible than llama.cpp for non-expert users while maintaining comparable inference speed through native GGUF optimization.
Provides managed cloud hosting of the Solar model through Ollama Cloud platform with GPU acceleration, eliminating local hardware requirements while maintaining the same REST API and SDK interfaces as local Ollama. Pricing tiers (Free, Pro, Max) control concurrent model instances and total GPU compute time allocation, with usage measured in GPU-hours rather than tokens, enabling predictable cost scaling for variable workloads.
Unique: Ollama Cloud uses GPU-hour billing model instead of token-based pricing, making it cost-effective for variable-length outputs and unpredictable workloads. Maintains identical API surface to local Ollama, enabling zero-code migration between local and cloud deployments.
vs alternatives: Cheaper than OpenAI API for high-volume inference; simpler deployment than self-hosted vLLM clusters; more cost-predictable than token-based cloud LLM services for long-form generation tasks.
Solar is fine-tuned using instruction-tuning methodology (specific approach undocumented) to follow user directives and generate contextually appropriate responses. Claims state-of-the-art performance for models under 30B parameters on the 'H6 benchmark' (benchmark definition unknown), reportedly outperforming Mixtral 8X7B (56B parameters) despite being 5.3x smaller. Performance claims are unverified by independent benchmarks and lack published scores.
Unique: Combines Depth Up-Scaling (DUS) architecture with instruction-tuning to achieve claimed performance parity with 5-6x larger models, but lacks published benchmark scores or methodology documentation to substantiate claims. No independent verification available.
vs alternatives: If benchmark claims are accurate, offers 5-6x parameter efficiency vs. Mixtral 8X7B and 70B models; however, unverified claims make direct comparison impossible without custom evaluation.
Solar is distributed via Ollama as a quantized GGUF artifact (6.1GB file size), abstracting away quantization scheme details and bit-depth from users. Ollama handles GGUF format loading, memory mapping, and GPU/CPU dispatch automatically, allowing developers to load and run the model without understanding quantization internals. Exact quantization scheme (Q4, Q5, Q8, etc.) is not documented.
Unique: Ollama abstracts GGUF quantization format handling completely, allowing non-expert users to deploy quantized models without understanding compression trade-offs. Automatic GPU/CPU dispatch based on available hardware without manual configuration.
vs alternatives: Simpler than managing raw GGUF files with llama.cpp; more transparent than proprietary quantization formats used by other model providers; smaller artifact size (6.1GB) than full-precision models enabling consumer hardware deployment.
Generates syntactically valid code from natural language descriptions using a transformer-based architecture trained on code-instruction pairs. The model processes user prompts through a 32K token context window and outputs complete code snippets, functions, or multi-file solutions. Generation is performed locally via Ollama's inference engine, eliminating cloud latency for code synthesis tasks.
Unique: Alibaba's code-specialized training approach combined with Ollama's local-first distribution model enables code generation without sending code to external cloud services. The uniform 32K context window across all model sizes (0.5B-32B) provides consistent context handling, though smaller models may struggle with complex generation tasks.
vs alternatives: Faster than GitHub Copilot for local development workflows because inference runs entirely on-device without cloud round-trips, and more privacy-preserving than OpenAI Codex because generated code never leaves the developer's machine.
Analyzes existing code and produces natural language explanations of functionality, logic flow, and implementation details through instruction-tuned transformer inference. The model processes code snippets (up to 32K tokens) and generates human-readable descriptions of what code does, why it's structured that way, and how different components interact. This capability leverages the model's code-specialized training to understand programming semantics beyond simple pattern matching.
Unique: Code-specialized training enables semantic understanding of programming constructs rather than treating code as generic text. The model recognizes language-specific idioms, design patterns, and architectural concepts, producing explanations that reference programming terminology and best practices.
vs alternatives: More accurate than generic LLMs for code explanation because it was fine-tuned specifically on code-reasoning tasks, and more accessible than static analysis tools because it produces human-readable explanations without requiring tool configuration.
Qwen 2.5 Coder (1.5B, 3B, 7B, 32B) scores higher at 23/100 vs Solar (10.7B) at 20/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Executes all code generation and analysis tasks entirely on local hardware without requiring cloud connectivity or external API calls. The model runs via Ollama's local inference engine, eliminating dependencies on OpenAI, Anthropic, or other cloud providers. Offline capability is achieved through local model weights and inference, enabling use in air-gapped environments or situations where cloud access is restricted.
Unique: Complete offline capability distinguishes Qwen 2.5 Coder from cloud-dependent models like GitHub Copilot and OpenAI Codex. All inference runs locally without external dependencies, enabling use in restricted environments.
vs alternatives: More privacy-preserving than cloud-based code generation because code never leaves the developer's machine, and more reliable in restricted networks because no internet connectivity is required after model download.
Identifies and corrects bugs, syntax errors, and logic issues in provided code through instruction-tuned analysis and generation. The model processes buggy code as input and outputs corrected versions with explanations of what was wrong and how the fix addresses the issue. Correction is performed through a generate-and-compare approach where the model produces fixed code based on error patterns learned during training.
Unique: Code-specialized training on bug-fix datasets enables the model to recognize common error patterns (null pointer dereferences, type mismatches, off-by-one errors) and generate contextually appropriate corrections. The model produces both corrected code and explanations, supporting learning alongside fixing.
vs alternatives: More accessible than compiler error messages for beginners because it explains WHY code is wrong and HOW to fix it, and faster than manual debugging because it analyzes code instantly without requiring IDE setup or test execution.
Generates syntactically correct code across multiple programming languages (Python, JavaScript, Java, C++, Go, Rust, SQL, etc.) through a single unified chat interface. The model's training on diverse code corpora enables it to switch between language contexts based on prompt specification, maintaining consistent code quality and style conventions across language families. Language selection is implicit in the prompt or explicit via instruction.
Unique: Training on code from diverse language ecosystems enables the model to understand language-agnostic algorithmic concepts and translate them into language-specific idioms. The unified interface eliminates the need for separate language-specific tools or models.
vs alternatives: More efficient than maintaining separate code generators for each language because a single model handles all languages, and more consistent than manual translation because the model applies learned conventions from each language's training data.
Completes code based on surrounding context using a 32K token context window that captures file history, imports, function signatures, and architectural patterns. The model processes partial code and generates continuations that respect existing code style, naming conventions, and project structure. Context awareness is achieved through the transformer's attention mechanism operating over the full 32K window, enabling multi-file understanding when context is provided.
Unique: The uniform 32K context window across all model sizes (0.5B-32B) provides consistent completion behavior regardless of model choice, though larger models produce higher-quality completions. Local execution via Ollama eliminates cloud latency, enabling real-time completion in IDE integrations.
vs alternatives: Faster than cloud-based completion services (GitHub Copilot, Tabnine Cloud) because inference runs locally without network round-trips, and more privacy-preserving because code never leaves the developer's machine.
Provides a conversational interface for code-related tasks through instruction-tuned chat interactions where users can ask questions, request modifications, and iterate on code through multi-turn dialogue. The model maintains conversation context across turns and responds to follow-up instructions like 'add error handling', 'optimize for performance', or 'add unit tests'. Chat is implemented via standard message format (role/content) compatible with Ollama's REST API and SDKs.
Unique: Instruction-tuning specifically for code-related conversations enables the model to understand domain-specific requests like 'add error handling' or 'optimize for memory usage' and respond with appropriate code modifications. The chat interface is standardized across Ollama's ecosystem, enabling integration with multiple frontends.
vs alternatives: More natural than single-shot code generation because users can iterate and refine through conversation, and more accessible than API-based tools because the chat interface requires no configuration beyond running Ollama locally.
Executes code generation and understanding tasks locally on user hardware with six model size options (0.5B, 1.5B, 3B, 7B, 14B, 32B) enabling trade-offs between inference speed and output quality. Smaller models (0.5B-3B) run on CPU or modest GPUs for fast iteration, while larger models (7B-32B) require more VRAM but produce higher-quality code. Model selection is made at runtime via Ollama's `ollama run` command or API.
Unique: Six model size options (0.5B-32B) enable fine-grained hardware/quality trade-offs without requiring separate model families. All variants share the same 32K context window and instruction-tuning approach, ensuring consistent behavior across sizes despite quality differences.
vs alternatives: More flexible than single-size models (e.g., Mistral 7B) because users can choose appropriate size for their hardware, and more cost-effective than cloud APIs because inference runs locally without per-token charges.
+3 more capabilities