| 0 |
| 1 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Starting Price | — | $10/mo |
| Capabilities | 12 decomposed | 13 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Analyzes code as it is written or opened in the editor, using static analysis rules to identify quality and security issues. Issues are highlighted directly in the editor at the line level and also aggregated in VS Code's Problems panel. The analysis runs automatically on file open and during editing without requiring manual trigger, providing immediate feedback on code quality violations across 10+ supported languages.
Unique: Integrates directly into VS Code's native annotation and Problems panel UI rather than using a separate sidebar or output pane, providing seamless inline feedback without context switching. Supports 10+ languages including infrastructure-as-code (Kubernetes, Docker) in addition to traditional programming languages.
vs alternatives: Faster feedback loop than ESLint/Pylint alone because it combines quality and security rules in a single unified analysis engine, and supports more languages out-of-the-box than language-specific linters.
Provides inline quick-fix actions (accessible via VS Code's lightbulb UI) that automatically resolve detected issues by modifying code. QuickFix actions are context-aware and rule-specific, applying targeted transformations to fix issues like unused imports, style violations, or security anti-patterns. Users can apply fixes individually or batch-apply across a file.
Unique: Integrates with VS Code's native QuickFix UI (lightbulb icon) rather than requiring a separate command or dialog, making fixes discoverable and actionable without context switching. Fixes are rule-aware and can handle language-specific transformations across 10+ languages.
vs alternatives: More discoverable than command-palette-based fixes (e.g., Prettier format-on-save) because QuickFix appears inline at the issue location, and more comprehensive than language-specific auto-fixers because it covers security and quality rules in addition to style.
Identifies code quality and security issues before code is committed to version control, enabling developers to fix issues locally before pushing. The extension analyzes code in real-time as it is written, providing feedback before the commit stage. Integration with SCM (git, etc.) is implicit — the extension can detect issues before SCM push, but no direct SCM API access or git-specific features are documented.
Unique: Provides real-time feedback during development rather than requiring a separate pre-commit hook or CI/CD step, enabling developers to fix issues immediately without context switching. Integration is implicit — relies on real-time analysis rather than explicit SCM hooks.
vs alternatives: More immediate feedback than pre-commit hooks (e.g., husky, pre-commit framework) because analysis runs continuously during editing, and more practical than CI/CD-only feedback because issues are caught before commit rather than after.
Offers a free tier with core static analysis capabilities (real-time issue detection, QuickFix, basic rules) and optional premium features via SonarQube Cloud or Server subscription. The free tier includes standalone analysis for 7 primary languages and basic security rules. Premium features (Connected Mode, extended language support, advanced security analysis, AI CodeFix) require a SonarQube Cloud or Server account. SonarQube Cloud offers a free tier for public projects.
Unique: Freemium model with clear separation between free (standalone analysis) and premium (Connected Mode, extended languages, advanced security) features. SonarQube Cloud free tier for public projects enables open-source adoption without cost.
vs alternatives: More accessible than paid-only tools (e.g., commercial SAST tools) because free tier provides core functionality, and more transparent than tools with hidden paywalls because feature tiers are clearly documented.
Generates automated fixes for detected issues using an AI model, providing intelligent remediation beyond rule-based QuickFix. The AI CodeFix feature is mentioned as a capability but implementation details are unknown — it is unclear whether fixes are generated locally or via cloud API, which model is used, or how the feature handles complex refactoring scenarios. Users can apply AI-generated fixes inline similar to QuickFix actions.
Unique: unknown — insufficient data. Implementation architecture (local vs. cloud), model identity, and technical approach are not documented.
vs alternatives: unknown — insufficient data. Cannot compare to alternatives (e.g., GitHub Copilot fixes, Codemod) without knowing implementation details.
Provides detailed explanations of detected issues directly in the editor, framed as a 'personal coding tutor.' When users hover over or select an issue, the extension displays rule description, severity, and contextual guidance explaining why the issue matters and how to avoid it. This capability is designed to help developers understand coding best practices, not just fix issues mechanically.
Unique: Integrates explanations directly into the editor's hover and context menu UI rather than requiring users to visit external documentation or rule databases. Framing as 'personal coding tutor' positions learning as a first-class feature, not an afterthought.
vs alternatives: More accessible than external rule documentation (e.g., ESLint rule pages) because explanations appear inline without context switching, and more comprehensive than generic linter messages because explanations are curated by SonarSource experts.
Classifies detected issues into distinct categories (security vulnerabilities, code quality problems, maintainability issues) and assigns severity levels (blocker, critical, major, minor, info). This categorization enables developers to prioritize fixes and understand the impact of each issue. Severity is determined by rule configuration and can be customized via SonarQube Server/Cloud connection.
Unique: Combines security and quality issue detection in a single analysis engine with unified severity ranking, rather than requiring separate security scanners (e.g., SAST tools) and linters. Severity is configurable via SonarQube Server/Cloud, enabling team-specific risk models.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than language-specific linters (ESLint, Pylint) because it includes security-focused rules in addition to quality rules, and more actionable than generic SAST tools because severity is integrated into the development workflow.
Detects hardcoded secrets, API keys, passwords, and other sensitive credentials in source code. The capability is mentioned in documentation but implementation details are unknown — scope, detection patterns, and false-positive rates are not documented. Detected secrets are flagged as security issues in the editor.
Unique: unknown — insufficient data. Detection patterns, scope, and implementation approach are not documented.
vs alternatives: unknown — insufficient data. Cannot compare to alternatives (e.g., git-secrets, TruffleHog, Gitleaks) without knowing detection patterns and accuracy.
+4 more capabilities
Generates single-line and multi-line code suggestions in real-time as developers type, using semantic indexing of the entire codebase to retrieve relevant type definitions, function signatures, and contextual patterns. The system maintains a 1M token context window (Pro/Team tiers) that enables suggestions informed by distant code definitions and cross-file dependencies, constructed via local codebase semantic search rather than simple token-based recency. Suggestions adapt to detected coding style on Pro/Team tiers through implicit pattern learning from recent edits.
Unique: 1M token context window with codebase-wide semantic indexing enables suggestions informed by distant code definitions and cross-file patterns, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that typically use fixed context windows (4K-32K tokens) or file-local context. Claimed 250ms latency suggests optimized retrieval pipeline, though indexing mechanism and performance at scale remain undisclosed.
vs alternatives: Larger context window than GitHub Copilot (8K-32K tokens) and faster latency than unnamed competitors (250ms vs 783ms claimed), enabling suggestions on large codebases with minimal typing delay; trade-off is cloud dependency and undisclosed free tier limitations.
Provides a separate chat interface supporting multiple LLM backends (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4, others) for conversational code assistance. Users attach files, reference recent edits, and trigger compiler diagnostic uploads; the system generates diffs and applies code changes directly to the editor. Model selection is per-conversation, and $5/month in credits (included in Pro/Team) covers external model API costs; overage pricing is undisclosed. Hotkey-driven workflow enables rapid context switching between inline completion and chat.
Unique: Multi-model chat interface with per-conversation model selection and integrated diff application, combined with compiler diagnostic auto-upload. Unlike Copilot Chat (single model per tier) or standalone ChatGPT, Supermaven Chat unifies multiple LLM backends in a single hotkey-driven workflow with direct editor integration for change application.
Supermaven scores higher at 71/100 vs SonarQube for IDE at 51/100. SonarQube for IDE leads on adoption and ecosystem, while Supermaven is stronger on quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: Supports multiple LLM backends (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet) in one interface with included credits, whereas GitHub Copilot Chat is single-model per tier and requires separate ChatGPT subscription for model switching; trade-off is credit limits and unknown overage pricing.
Supermaven Chat can automatically upload compiler diagnostic messages (errors, warnings) alongside code context to provide error-aware suggestions and fixes. The mechanism is described as 'automatically uploading your code together with compiler diagnostic messages,' but specific language/compiler support and the upload trigger mechanism are undisclosed. This feature is Chat-only and not available in inline completion.
Unique: Automatic compiler diagnostic upload in Chat for error-aware suggestions, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that require manual error context or have limited diagnostic integration. Supermaven's approach reduces friction but with undisclosed language/compiler support.
vs alternatives: Automatic diagnostic upload reduces manual context-gathering compared to manual copy-paste; trade-off is undisclosed language support and unclear upload trigger mechanism.
Supermaven offers a 30-day free trial of the Pro tier ($10/month), providing full access to 1M token context window, largest model, style adaptation, and $5/month chat credits. No credit card is required to start the trial (implied), and trial conversion to paid is automatic after 30 days unless cancelled. Trial terms and auto-renewal policy are not explicitly detailed.
Unique: 30-day free trial of Pro tier with full feature access (1M context, largest model, chat credits), versus competitors (Copilot 2-month free trial, Tabnine free tier only) with different trial lengths and feature access. Supermaven's approach is generous but with undisclosed auto-renewal terms.
vs alternatives: Full Pro feature access during trial compared to limited free tier; trade-off is undisclosed auto-renewal policy and potential unexpected charges if not cancelled.
Supermaven requires internet connectivity and server-side inference; no offline mode or local inference capability is mentioned or available. All code completion requests are sent to Supermaven's backend servers for processing, and responses are returned over the network. This creates a hard dependency on network connectivity and Supermaven's service availability; if the service is down or network is unavailable, code completion is not available.
Unique: Supermaven has no offline mode or local inference capability; all processing is server-side. GitHub Copilot also requires server-side inference, but Tabnine offers local inference options for some use cases. Supermaven's lack of offline capability is a significant limitation for developers with connectivity constraints.
vs alternatives: Supermaven's server-side-only approach is comparable to GitHub Copilot; Tabnine offers local inference options, making Tabnine more suitable for offline work. Supermaven's lack of offline capability is a weakness vs. Tabnine.
Analyzes recent code edits and inferred coding patterns to adapt inline suggestions to match team conventions, naming patterns, and structural preferences. The mechanism is implicit (not explicit fine-tuning) and operates only on Pro/Team tiers, suggesting pattern learning from editor activity rather than explicit configuration. Free tier uses a single base model without personalization.
Unique: Implicit style adaptation via editor activity analysis without explicit configuration, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that require manual style guides or explicit fine-tuning. Supermaven's approach is transparent to the user but also non-configurable and undisclosed in mechanism.
vs alternatives: Requires no manual style configuration compared to tools requiring explicit style guides; trade-off is lack of transparency and inability to control or export learned styles.
Delivers code suggestions to the editor inline as the developer types, with a claimed baseline latency of 250ms from keystroke to suggestion display. The system uses a cloud inference backend and local editor plugin to minimize round-trip time. Latency claim is positioned against an unnamed competitor (783ms), but methodology is undisclosed and no independent verification is provided.
Unique: Claimed 250ms latency via optimized cloud inference pipeline and editor plugin architecture, versus competitors with higher latency (783ms unnamed baseline). Actual differentiation is undisclosed; mechanism may involve request batching, model quantization, or edge caching, but specifics are not public.
vs alternatives: Faster than unnamed competitor (250ms vs 783ms claimed); trade-off is cloud dependency and unverified latency claim with no SLA or performance guarantee.
Provides native editor extensions for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs (IntelliJ IDEA, PyCharm, WebStorm, etc.), and Neovim, enabling inline suggestion rendering, hotkey-driven chat access, and compiler diagnostic integration directly within the editor. Each plugin variant is maintained separately and integrates with the editor's native autocomplete UI, keybinding system, and file context APIs.
Unique: Native plugins for three major editor ecosystems (VS Code, JetBrains, Neovim) with integrated chat and diff application, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that support broader editor ecosystems but with less deep integration in some cases. Supermaven's approach prioritizes depth over breadth.
vs alternatives: Deep integration with VS Code and JetBrains (native autocomplete UI, hotkey system) compared to web-based tools or lighter integrations; trade-off is limited editor support (no Sublime, Vim, Emacs) and undisclosed Neovim support details.
+5 more capabilities