Strut vs Relativity
Side-by-side comparison to help you choose.
| Feature | Strut | Relativity |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Product | Product |
| UnfragileRank | 30/100 | 32/100 |
| Adoption | 0 | 0 |
| Quality | 0 | 1 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Paid |
| Capabilities | 11 decomposed | 13 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Generates writing suggestions and completes partial content by analyzing the current document context and user intent. The system maintains awareness of document structure, tone, and previously written sections to provide contextually relevant suggestions rather than generic completions. Integration with LLM APIs (likely OpenAI or similar) enables real-time suggestion generation as users type or request rewrites.
Unique: Maintains document-level context awareness for suggestions rather than treating each request in isolation; suggestions are generated based on previously written content, structure, and implicit tone detection within the same document
vs alternatives: Outperforms ChatGPT for writing assistance because it preserves document context automatically rather than requiring manual copy-paste of surrounding text for each suggestion
Enables non-linear rearrangement of document sections through a visual block-based interface where users can drag content units (paragraphs, sections, or outline items) to new positions. The system preserves internal formatting, links, and metadata during moves while automatically updating cross-references and table of contents if present. Built on a block-based document model (similar to Notion or Roam) rather than traditional linear text editing.
Unique: Implements block-based document model with visual drag-and-drop reorganization, treating content as movable units rather than linear text stream; preserves all formatting and metadata during moves through a structured data model rather than string manipulation
vs alternatives: Solves a specific pain point better than Google Docs or Word (which require manual cut-paste) and Notion (which is optimized for databases, not narrative flow); enables writers to restructure content as intuitively as rearranging physical index cards
Analyzes document text for grammatical errors, style issues, and clarity problems using NLP and rule-based checking. Provides inline suggestions for corrections with explanations of why the change is recommended. Learns from user corrections to improve suggestion accuracy over time. Supports multiple language variants (US English, British English, etc.) and style guides (AP, Chicago, MLA).
Unique: Combines rule-based grammar checking with contextual NLP analysis and learning from user corrections; provides explanations for suggestions rather than just flagging errors, helping users understand grammar rules
vs alternatives: More integrated than Grammarly because it's built into the writing interface; better than basic spell-checkers because it understands grammar and style, not just spelling
Enables multiple users to edit the same document simultaneously with live cursor positions, selection highlighting, and automatic conflict resolution. Uses operational transformation (OT) or CRDT (Conflict-free Replicated Data Type) algorithms to merge concurrent edits from multiple users without requiring manual conflict resolution. Presence indicators show which users are currently viewing/editing and their cursor positions in real-time.
Unique: Implements real-time collaborative editing with automatic conflict resolution (likely using CRDT or OT) and live presence indicators, enabling true simultaneous editing rather than sequential turn-taking or manual merging
vs alternatives: Provides faster, more intuitive collaboration than Google Docs for writing workflows because it's purpose-built for narrative content rather than general document editing; presence awareness and block-based structure make it clearer who's editing what section
Analyzes selected text and generates alternative versions with different tones, styles, or purposes (e.g., formal to casual, technical to accessible, passive to active voice). The system uses prompt engineering and LLM fine-tuning to understand tone parameters and apply them consistently across rewrites. Users can select predefined tone profiles or define custom tone guidelines that persist across rewrites.
Unique: Provides tone-aware rewriting that maintains semantic meaning while adjusting stylistic parameters; uses predefined tone profiles or custom guidelines to ensure consistency across multiple rewrites rather than generating random variations
vs alternatives: More targeted than generic ChatGPT rewrites because it's optimized for tone adjustment specifically; better than Hemingway Editor because it generates alternatives rather than just highlighting issues
Analyzes document content or user-provided topic and automatically generates hierarchical outlines with suggested section headings, subsections, and logical flow. Uses NLP to identify natural topic boundaries in existing text or generates outline structure from scratch based on topic analysis. Outlines are editable and can be converted directly into document structure with placeholder content.
Unique: Generates hierarchical outlines with semantic understanding of topic structure rather than simple keyword extraction; outlines are directly convertible to document structure with placeholder content, bridging planning and drafting phases
vs alternatives: More useful than ChatGPT for outline generation because it understands document structure and can convert outlines directly into editable document sections; better than Notion templates because it's customized to your specific topic
Enables reviewers to leave inline comments on specific text passages with threaded discussion, allowing authors and reviewers to discuss changes without modifying the document directly. Comments are anchored to specific text ranges and persist even if surrounding text is edited. Supports comment resolution workflow where comments can be marked as addressed, creating an audit trail of feedback incorporation.
Unique: Implements text-anchored commenting with threaded discussion and resolution tracking, maintaining comment context even as surrounding text is edited; creates audit trail of feedback incorporation rather than just collecting comments
vs alternatives: Better than email-based feedback because comments stay in context and are linked to specific text; better than Google Docs comments because threaded discussion is more prominent and resolution workflow is explicit
Analyzes document text to compute readability metrics (Flesch-Kincaid grade level, reading time, word count, sentence complexity) and provides writing quality insights (passive voice percentage, adverb usage, repetition detection). Metrics update in real-time as users write and can be filtered by section or time period. Provides comparative benchmarks against target audience reading level.
Unique: Provides real-time writing analytics integrated into the editing interface with section-level filtering and comparative benchmarks; metrics update as users type rather than requiring manual analysis or external tool integration
vs alternatives: More integrated and real-time than Hemingway Editor or Grammarly because metrics update continuously during writing; better than manual readability checking because it's automated and provides comparative context
+3 more capabilities
Automatically categorizes and codes documents based on learned patterns from human-reviewed samples, using machine learning to predict relevance, privilege, and responsiveness. Reduces manual review burden by identifying documents that match specified criteria without human intervention.
Ingests and processes massive volumes of documents in native formats while preserving metadata integrity and creating searchable indices. Handles format conversion, deduplication, and metadata extraction without data loss.
Provides tools for organizing and retrieving documents during depositions and trial, including document linking, timeline creation, and quick-search capabilities. Enables attorneys to rapidly locate supporting documents during proceedings.
Manages documents subject to regulatory requirements and compliance obligations, including retention policies, audit trails, and regulatory reporting. Tracks document lifecycle and ensures compliance with legal holds and preservation requirements.
Manages multi-reviewer document review workflows with task assignment, progress tracking, and quality control mechanisms. Supports parallel review by multiple team members with conflict resolution and consistency checking.
Enables rapid searching across massive document collections using full-text indexing, Boolean operators, and field-specific queries. Supports complex search syntax for precise document retrieval and filtering.
Relativity scores higher at 32/100 vs Strut at 30/100. However, Strut offers a free tier which may be better for getting started.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Identifies and flags privileged communications (attorney-client, work product) and confidential information through pattern recognition and metadata analysis. Maintains comprehensive audit trails of all access to sensitive materials.
Implements role-based access controls with fine-grained permissions at document, workspace, and field levels. Allows administrators to restrict access based on user roles, case assignments, and security clearances.
+5 more capabilities