| 0 |
| 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Capabilities | 12 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Provides a drag-and-drop interface to compose multi-step agent workflows by connecting action nodes, decision branches, and tool integrations without code. Uses a directed acyclic graph (DAG) execution model where each node represents an agent action or tool call, with conditional routing based on LLM outputs or explicit branching logic. Workflows are serialized as JSON configuration and executed by a runtime engine that manages state, context passing, and error handling across steps.
Unique: Combines visual DAG-based workflow design with LLM-driven decision making at each node, allowing non-technical users to define complex agent behaviors while maintaining full execution transparency through step-by-step logging
vs alternatives: More accessible than code-first frameworks like LangChain for non-technical teams, while offering deeper workflow visibility than simple prompt-chaining tools
Maintains a centralized registry of tools and actions that agents can invoke, with automatic schema generation and validation. Each tool is defined with input/output schemas (JSON Schema), descriptions, and execution handlers. The framework automatically converts tool definitions into function-calling payloads compatible with OpenAI, Anthropic, and other LLM APIs, handling parameter validation, type coercion, and error propagation back to the agent for retry logic.
Unique: Provides multi-provider function-calling abstraction that automatically translates tool schemas into OpenAI, Anthropic, and custom LLM formats, with built-in validation and error handling that allows agents to reason about tool failures
vs alternatives: More robust than manual function-calling implementations because it enforces schema validation and provides standardized error handling, reducing agent hallucination of invalid tool parameters
Provides tools for iterating on agent prompts and configurations, including A/B testing to compare performance across prompt variants. Supports prompt templating with variable substitution, version control for prompt history, and automated evaluation metrics (correctness, latency, cost). Includes prompt optimization suggestions based on execution traces and failure analysis.
Unique: Provides integrated prompt optimization with A/B testing and version control, enabling systematic improvement of agent prompts based on empirical performance data
vs alternatives: More rigorous than manual prompt iteration because it uses statistical testing and version control, reducing guesswork and enabling reproducible improvements
Implements safety mechanisms to prevent agents from taking harmful actions or generating unsafe content. Includes input validation (blocking malicious queries), output filtering (detecting unsafe responses), and action guardrails (preventing agents from calling dangerous tools). Uses rule-based filters, LLM-based classifiers, and external safety APIs to detect and block unsafe behavior. Supports custom safety policies tailored to specific domains.
Unique: Provides multi-layer safety mechanisms (input validation, output filtering, action guardrails) with support for custom domain-specific policies, enabling agents to operate safely in regulated environments
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than basic content filtering because it includes action-level guardrails and policy customization, preventing not just unsafe outputs but unsafe agent behaviors
Implements a pluggable memory system for agents to store and retrieve conversation history, task state, and learned facts across sessions. Supports multiple storage backends (in-memory, PostgreSQL, vector databases) with automatic context window management that summarizes or truncates old messages to fit LLM token limits. Memory is organized by agent instance, conversation thread, and optional user/organization scope, with retrieval strategies including recency-based, semantic similarity, and explicit tagging.
Unique: Provides pluggable storage backends with automatic context window optimization, allowing agents to maintain long-term memory while respecting LLM token limits through intelligent summarization and retrieval strategies
vs alternatives: More flexible than built-in LLM context windows because it decouples memory storage from token limits, enabling agents to reference arbitrarily old information through semantic retrieval
Abstracts away provider-specific API differences (OpenAI, Anthropic, Ollama, Azure, etc.) behind a unified interface for model invocation. Handles provider-specific prompt formatting, token counting, streaming response handling, and error recovery. Supports dynamic provider selection based on cost, latency, or capability requirements, with automatic fallback to alternative providers on failure. Manages API keys, rate limiting, and usage tracking across providers.
Unique: Provides unified LLM interface with automatic provider failover and cost-based routing, allowing agents to seamlessly switch between OpenAI, Anthropic, Ollama, and other providers without code changes
vs alternatives: More flexible than single-provider frameworks because it decouples agent logic from LLM choice, enabling cost optimization and vendor independence that frameworks like LangChain also offer but with tighter integration
Provides a runtime environment for executing agents in production, with support for containerized deployment (Docker), environment isolation, and resource management. Agents run as isolated processes or containers with configurable CPU/memory limits, automatic scaling based on workload, and health monitoring. Supports both synchronous (request-response) and asynchronous (background job) execution modes, with job queuing and result persistence for long-running tasks.
Unique: Provides integrated deployment runtime with containerization support and asynchronous job execution, allowing agents to run as isolated, scalable workloads with automatic health monitoring and resource management
vs alternatives: More production-ready than simple Python libraries because it includes built-in containerization, job queuing, and health monitoring, reducing operational overhead compared to manual deployment with frameworks like LangChain
Implements structured reasoning patterns that decompose complex agent tasks into intermediate steps, with explicit reasoning traces visible to developers. Uses chain-of-thought prompting to encourage LLMs to explain their reasoning before taking actions, with support for multi-step planning where agents break down goals into sub-tasks. Includes built-in patterns for reflection (agent evaluates its own outputs), re-planning (agent adjusts strategy if initial plan fails), and hierarchical task decomposition (breaking large goals into smaller, manageable steps).
Unique: Provides structured chain-of-thought patterns with built-in reflection and re-planning, making agent reasoning transparent and debuggable while enabling self-correction through explicit reasoning traces
vs alternatives: More transparent than black-box agent frameworks because it exposes intermediate reasoning steps, enabling developers to understand and debug agent decisions rather than treating the agent as an opaque decision-maker
+4 more capabilities
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
Supabase scores higher at 42/100 vs SuperAGI at 20/100. SuperAGI leads on quality, while Supabase is stronger on ecosystem. Supabase also has a free tier, making it more accessible.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities