| Ecosystem | 1 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 5 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Splinter uses a transformer-based architecture to identify and extract answer spans directly from input passages. The model processes question-passage pairs through BERT-style token embeddings and attention layers, then predicts start and end token positions marking the answer span. Unlike generative QA models, it operates via span selection from existing text, enabling high precision on factoid questions where answers appear verbatim in the source material.
Unique: Splinter introduces a lightweight span-selection mechanism optimized for efficiency compared to full-sequence generation models; uses a two-pointer approach (start/end token prediction) rather than autoregressive decoding, reducing inference latency by 3-5x versus generative alternatives while maintaining high F1 scores on SQuAD-style benchmarks
vs alternatives: Faster and more deterministic than generative QA models (GPT-based) because it predicts token positions rather than generating sequences, making it ideal for production systems requiring sub-100ms latency and exact source attribution
The model encodes question-passage pairs through stacked transformer layers with bidirectional self-attention, using segment embeddings to distinguish question tokens from passage tokens. Attention masking prevents the model from attending across question-passage boundaries inappropriately, and positional embeddings track token positions within the concatenated sequence. This architecture enables the model to build rich contextual representations where question semantics inform passage understanding.
Unique: Splinter's attention masking strategy uses segment-aware masking to prevent cross-segment attention leakage while maintaining full bidirectional context within question and passage separately, a design choice that improves answer localization compared to models using simple concatenation without segment boundaries
vs alternatives: More efficient than cross-encoder rerankers because it encodes question-passage pairs in a single forward pass rather than requiring separate encodings, and more accurate than dual-encoder retrievers because bidirectional attention allows passage tokens to be contextualized by the full question
Splinter can be fine-tuned on extractive QA datasets (SQuAD, Natural Questions, etc.) using a span-based loss function that independently predicts start and end token positions. The training objective minimizes cross-entropy loss for both start and end position predictions, allowing the model to learn task-specific answer span patterns. The model supports standard PyTorch training loops with HuggingFace Trainer API, enabling domain adaptation without architectural changes.
Unique: Splinter's span-based loss design allows efficient fine-tuning without modifying the model architecture; the loss function treats start and end position prediction as independent classification tasks, enabling straightforward optimization and avoiding the complexity of sequence-level losses used in generative models
vs alternatives: Simpler to fine-tune than generative QA models because span prediction requires only two classification heads rather than full sequence generation, reducing training time by 2-3x and enabling faster iteration on domain-specific datasets
Splinter supports efficient batch inference through HuggingFace's tokenizer and model APIs, which automatically handle variable-length sequences via dynamic padding and attention masking. The model processes multiple question-passage pairs in parallel, padding shorter sequences to the longest in the batch and masking padding tokens to prevent attention computation on them. This design enables GPU utilization efficiency while maintaining correctness across variable-length inputs.
Unique: Splinter's batch inference leverages HuggingFace's optimized tokenizer with automatic attention_mask generation, avoiding manual padding logic and reducing inference code complexity; the model's span-prediction design (vs sequence generation) makes batching more efficient because all samples complete in a single forward pass regardless of answer length
vs alternatives: More efficient batching than generative QA models because span prediction has fixed output size (2 logits per token) regardless of answer length, whereas generative models require variable-length decoding that complicates batching and reduces GPU utilization
Splinter is compatible with HuggingFace Inference API, Azure ML, and AWS SageMaker endpoints, enabling one-click deployment without custom containerization. The model follows the standard HuggingFace pipeline interface, allowing inference through REST APIs with automatic request/response serialization. Deployment handles model loading, batching, and GPU allocation transparently, abstracting infrastructure complexity from users.
Unique: Splinter's deployment compatibility with multiple cloud providers (HuggingFace, Azure, AWS) via standardized pipeline interfaces reduces deployment friction; the model's small size (110M parameters for base variant) enables cost-effective inference on lower-tier GPU instances compared to larger models
vs alternatives: Easier to deploy than custom QA models because it's pre-integrated with major cloud platforms' inference services, and cheaper to run than larger generative models (GPT-3.5, Llama) due to smaller parameter count and faster inference time
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
Supabase scores higher at 42/100 vs splinter-base at 35/100. splinter-base leads on adoption and ecosystem, while Supabase is stronger on quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities