| 0 |
| 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Capabilities | 14 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Routes inference requests across multiple LLM providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.) through a single abstraction layer, handling provider-specific API differences, authentication, and request/response normalization. Implements a provider registry pattern that abstracts away protocol differences and enables dynamic provider selection based on cost, latency, or capability constraints without application code changes.
Unique: Implements a unified gateway that normalizes requests/responses across heterogeneous LLM APIs while maintaining provider-specific optimizations, rather than forcing all providers into a lowest-common-denominator interface
vs alternatives: More flexible than LiteLLM's simple provider switching because it couples routing with observability and optimization, enabling cost-aware decisions based on real production metrics
Captures detailed telemetry from every LLM inference including latency, token counts, costs, provider, model, and custom metadata through a structured logging pipeline. Integrates with observability backends (likely Datadog, New Relic, or similar) to enable real-time dashboards, alerting, and debugging of LLM application behavior in production without requiring manual instrumentation.
Unique: Bakes observability directly into the gateway layer so every inference is automatically instrumented without application code changes, capturing provider/model/cost context that would be invisible in application-level logging
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than manual logging because it captures provider-level details (token counts, actual model used, provider-specific errors) automatically, whereas LangChain callbacks require explicit instrumentation
Caches LLM responses based on exact request matching or semantic similarity, returning cached results for duplicate or similar requests without re-invoking the model. Implements cache invalidation strategies and provides cache hit/miss metrics to measure effectiveness and cost savings.
Unique: Supports both exact-match caching and semantic deduplication, so identical requests hit the cache instantly, but similar requests can also benefit from cached results if configured
vs alternatives: More effective than simple request hashing because semantic deduplication catches similar queries that exact matching would miss, whereas naive caching only helps with identical requests
Orchestrates multi-step LLM reasoning workflows where outputs from one step feed into subsequent steps, with automatic prompt chaining, context passing, and error handling. Supports branching logic, conditional execution, and result aggregation across parallel branches, enabling complex reasoning tasks without manual orchestration code.
Unique: Provides a declarative workflow engine for multi-step reasoning with automatic context passing and error handling, rather than requiring manual orchestration code in the application
vs alternatives: More maintainable than hardcoded step sequences because workflows are declarative and can be modified without code changes, whereas manual orchestration requires application code updates
Applies safety filters to both inputs and outputs using a combination of built-in rules (PII detection, toxicity filtering, jailbreak detection) and custom user-defined rules. Implements a rule engine that can block, redact, or flag content based on configurable criteria, with audit logging of all filtering decisions.
Unique: Integrates safety filtering directly into the inference gateway with both built-in rules and custom rule engine, so safety is enforced consistently across all inferences without application code changes
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than post-hoc moderation because it filters both inputs and outputs, whereas application-level filtering typically only catches output issues
Automatically selects the best model for a given task based on required capabilities (vision, function calling, JSON mode, etc.) and constraints (cost, latency, quality). Maintains a capability matrix of all supported models and uses it to route requests to models that meet requirements without manual provider/model selection.
Unique: Maintains a capability matrix and uses it for automatic model selection based on requirements, rather than requiring manual provider/model specification in application code
vs alternatives: More flexible than hardcoded model selection because it automatically finds models matching requirements, whereas manual selection requires developers to know which models support which capabilities
Provides built-in infrastructure for running controlled experiments on LLM applications by splitting traffic between variants (different prompts, models, providers, parameters) and measuring outcomes against defined metrics. Implements statistical significance testing and variant selection logic to automatically route traffic toward better-performing configurations without manual intervention.
Unique: Integrates experimentation directly into the inference gateway so variants can be tested without application code changes, and automatically collects the observability data needed for statistical analysis
vs alternatives: More integrated than running experiments in application code because it handles traffic splitting, outcome collection, and statistical analysis as a unified system, whereas manual A/B testing requires custom infrastructure
Evaluates LLM outputs against user-defined success criteria using a combination of automated metrics (BLEU, ROUGE, semantic similarity) and custom evaluation functions (LLM-as-judge, regex matching, structured validation). Runs evaluations on inference batches or in real-time to measure quality, cost, and latency tradeoffs across model/prompt variants.
Unique: Provides a pluggable evaluation framework that supports both standard metrics and custom LLM-based judges, integrated into the experimentation pipeline so evaluation results directly inform variant selection
vs alternatives: More flexible than static benchmarks because it allows custom evaluation functions tailored to your specific task, whereas generic metrics (BLEU, ROUGE) often fail to capture domain-specific quality criteria
+6 more capabilities
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
Supabase scores higher at 42/100 vs TensorZero at 23/100. TensorZero leads on quality, while Supabase is stronger on ecosystem. Supabase also has a free tier, making it more accessible.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities