| 0 |
| 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Capabilities | 9 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Enables users to discover, validate, and register Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers through a desktop graphical interface without writing configuration files or YAML. The application likely maintains a registry or connects to public MCP server repositories, validates server endpoints and capabilities, and stores configurations in a local database or config file that can be read by compatible clients.
Unique: Provides a visual, click-based interface for MCP server management instead of requiring manual YAML/JSON editing in Claude Desktop config files or environment setup scripts. Abstracts away protocol details and validation logic behind a desktop GUI.
vs alternatives: Eliminates the need to manually edit ~/.config/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json or equivalent files, making MCP server integration accessible to non-technical users compared to CLI-based or config-file-based alternatives.
Maintains a searchable, categorized inventory of available tools and MCP servers with metadata (name, description, capabilities, version, authentication requirements). The application likely stores this inventory locally with indexing for fast search and filtering, and may sync with remote registries or allow manual tool registration with custom metadata.
Unique: Centralizes tool discovery in a desktop application with local indexing rather than requiring users to consult multiple documentation sites, CLI registries, or cloud-based marketplaces. Provides a unified view of both local and remote tools.
vs alternatives: Faster and more discoverable than manually browsing MCP server documentation or GitHub repositories; more accessible than CLI-based tool registries like those in Anthropic's tools ecosystem.
Automates the process of connecting registered tools and MCP servers to compatible AI clients (Claude Desktop, IDEs, or other MCP hosts) by generating and injecting the necessary configuration without manual file editing. The application likely detects installed clients, validates compatibility, and writes configuration in the format expected by each client type.
Unique: Automates configuration file generation and injection across multiple client types rather than requiring users to manually edit JSON/YAML files or use CLI commands. Detects installed clients and adapts configuration format accordingly.
vs alternatives: Eliminates manual config file editing entirely, making tool integration 10x faster than Claude Desktop's native config approach and more reliable than copy-paste-based setup instructions.
Provides a secure interface for storing and managing API keys, OAuth tokens, and other credentials required by tools and MCP servers. The application likely encrypts credentials locally, manages token refresh for OAuth flows, and injects credentials into tool configurations at runtime without exposing them in plaintext config files.
Unique: Centralizes credential management for all tools in a single encrypted local store rather than requiring users to manage API keys scattered across multiple config files or environment variables. Handles OAuth token refresh automatically.
vs alternatives: More secure than storing credentials in plaintext config files; more convenient than manually managing environment variables or using separate secrets managers for each tool.
Continuously monitors the availability and health of registered tools and MCP servers by periodically sending health check requests (e.g., ping, capability queries) and displaying status in the UI. The application likely maintains a status history, alerts on failures, and may automatically attempt reconnection or fallback to alternative servers.
Unique: Provides built-in health monitoring for all registered tools in a single dashboard rather than requiring users to manually check tool status or set up separate monitoring infrastructure. Integrates monitoring directly into the tool management workflow.
vs alternatives: More integrated than external monitoring tools like Datadog or New Relic; more accessible than CLI-based health check scripts.
Allows users to define and switch between different configurations for the same tools across environments (development, staging, production) with different credentials, endpoints, and parameters. The application likely stores environment profiles and enables one-click switching or automatic environment detection based on the active AI client.
Unique: Manages multiple tool configurations per environment in a single application rather than requiring users to maintain separate config files or environment variable sets for each environment. Enables one-click environment switching.
vs alternatives: More user-friendly than managing environment variables or separate config files; more integrated than external configuration management tools.
Displays detailed schemas and documentation for tool capabilities, including input/output types, required parameters, error codes, and usage examples. The application likely parses MCP server capability manifests or tool schemas and renders them in a human-readable format with search and filtering.
Unique: Renders tool capability schemas in an interactive, searchable UI rather than requiring users to read raw JSON schemas or external documentation. Centralizes documentation for all tools in one place.
vs alternatives: More accessible than reading raw JSON schemas or scattered documentation; more integrated than external documentation tools like Swagger UI.
Enables users to export all registered tools and configurations as a portable file (e.g., JSON, YAML) and import them on another machine or share them with team members. The application likely handles credential encryption during export and validates configurations during import to ensure compatibility.
Unique: Provides one-click export/import of entire tool configurations rather than requiring users to manually copy config files or re-register tools. Handles credential encryption during export to maintain security.
vs alternatives: More convenient than manually copying config files; more secure than sharing unencrypted credentials.
+1 more capabilities
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
Supabase scores higher at 42/100 vs Toolbase at 24/100. Toolbase leads on quality, while Supabase is stronger on ecosystem. Supabase also has a free tier, making it more accessible.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities