FinQA ranks higher at 60/100 vs tiny-Qwen2ForSequenceClassification-2.5 at 44/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | tiny-Qwen2ForSequenceClassification-2.5 | FinQA |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Model | Dataset |
| UnfragileRank | 44/100 | 60/100 |
| Adoption | 1 | 1 |
| Quality | 0 | 1 |
| Ecosystem | 1 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 6 decomposed | 7 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Performs text classification using a distilled Qwen2 transformer architecture optimized for inference efficiency. The model uses a standard transformer encoder with a classification head, enabling fast inference on CPU and edge devices while maintaining reasonable accuracy. Built on HuggingFace transformers library with safetensors serialization for secure, fast model loading without arbitrary code execution.
Unique: Uses Qwen2 architecture (a modern, efficient transformer variant) distilled to 11.68M parameters with safetensors serialization, enabling trustless model loading without pickle deserialization vulnerabilities — differentiates from older BERT-based classifiers through superior tokenization and attention mechanisms while maintaining sub-100ms inference on CPU
vs alternatives: Smaller and faster than DistilBERT for classification while using more modern Qwen2 architecture; more deployable than full-size models like RoBERTa-large but with lower accuracy ceiling than larger classifiers
Loads pre-trained model weights and tokenizer from HuggingFace Hub with automatic caching, version management, and safetensors support. The implementation uses HuggingFace's model repository system to fetch model artifacts, cache them locally, and handle authentication for private models. Safetensors format ensures fast, secure deserialization without executing arbitrary Python code during model loading.
Unique: Integrates HuggingFace Hub's distributed model repository with safetensors format for secure, fast deserialization — avoids pickle vulnerabilities while providing automatic caching, version pinning, and seamless integration with HuggingFace Inference Endpoints and Azure ML deployment pipelines
vs alternatives: More convenient than manual weight downloading and management; safer than pickle-based model loading; better integrated with HuggingFace ecosystem than generic model registries like MLflow or Weights & Biases
Converts raw text into token IDs and attention masks compatible with Qwen2 architecture using the model's associated tokenizer. The tokenizer handles subword tokenization, special token injection, padding/truncation to max sequence length, and produces PyTorch/TensorFlow tensors ready for model inference. Supports both single samples and batch processing with automatic padding to the longest sequence in the batch.
Unique: Uses Qwen2's specialized tokenizer with optimized vocabulary for Chinese and English, supporting efficient subword tokenization with automatic batch padding and truncation — more efficient than generic BPE tokenizers for mixed-language content while maintaining compatibility with HuggingFace's standard preprocessing pipeline
vs alternatives: More efficient tokenization than BERT for Qwen2-compatible models; better multilingual support than English-only tokenizers; faster batch processing than manual token-by-token conversion
Processes multiple text samples in parallel with automatic padding to the longest sequence in the batch, reducing computational waste from fixed-size padding. The implementation groups sequences by length, applies padding only to the necessary extent, and executes forward passes on GPU/CPU with optimized tensor operations. Supports configurable batch sizes and return formats (logits, probabilities, or class labels).
Unique: Implements dynamic padding within batch processing to eliminate padding waste for variable-length sequences — reduces memory consumption by 20-40% compared to fixed-size padding while maintaining compatibility with standard HuggingFace inference APIs
vs alternatives: More memory-efficient than fixed-size batching; faster than processing sequences individually; simpler to implement than custom CUDA kernels for length-aware batching
Model is compatible with HuggingFace Inference Endpoints, Azure ML, and other managed inference platforms through standardized model format and safetensors serialization. The model can be deployed without custom code by specifying the model identifier, and platforms automatically handle model loading, batching, and API exposure. Supports both REST API and gRPC inference endpoints depending on platform.
Unique: Standardized safetensors format and HuggingFace Hub integration enable zero-code deployment across multiple managed platforms (HuggingFace Endpoints, Azure ML, etc.) — eliminates custom containerization and inference server setup while maintaining consistent model behavior
vs alternatives: Simpler deployment than custom Docker containers; more cost-effective than self-hosted inference servers; better integrated with HuggingFace ecosystem than generic model deployment platforms
Outputs calibrated probability scores for each classification class through softmax normalization of logits, enabling confidence-based decision making and threshold tuning. The model produces raw logits that are converted to probabilities, allowing downstream applications to set custom classification thresholds or reject low-confidence predictions. Supports both hard predictions (argmax) and soft predictions (probability distributions).
Unique: Provides raw logits and softmax-normalized probabilities enabling custom threshold tuning and confidence-based filtering — enables downstream applications to implement rejection sampling and human-in-the-loop workflows without retraining
vs alternatives: More flexible than fixed-threshold classifiers; enables confidence-based filtering without ensemble methods; simpler than Bayesian approaches while providing practical uncertainty estimates
Enables evaluation of AI systems' ability to perform chained mathematical operations (addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, comparisons) across both structured tables and unstructured text extracted from SEC filings. The dataset provides ground-truth question-answer pairs where answers require synthesizing data from multiple locations within earnings reports and applying sequential arithmetic operations, testing whether models can decompose complex financial queries into discrete computational steps.
Unique: Combines real SEC filing documents (not synthetic) with crowdsourced questions requiring multi-step arithmetic, creating a hybrid dataset that tests both domain knowledge extraction and quantitative reasoning in a single evaluation task. Unlike generic math word problems, answers require locating figures within 10+ page documents first.
vs alternatives: More challenging than DROP or SVAMP because it requires financial domain knowledge AND document retrieval before arithmetic, whereas generic math benchmarks assume figures are already extracted
Assesses whether AI systems understand financial terminology, accounting concepts, and domain-specific metrics by requiring them to answer questions about real earnings reports from S&P 500 companies. The dataset tests recognition of financial line items (revenue, COGS, operating expenses, net income), ability to distinguish between different financial statements (income statement vs balance sheet), and understanding of financial ratios and metrics without explicit instruction on their definitions.
Unique: Uses authentic SEC filings rather than synthetic financial data, exposing models to real-world accounting variations, footnote complexity, and the actual structure of professional financial documents. This tests transfer learning from general text to specialized domain without domain-specific pretraining.
vs alternatives: More authentic than synthetic financial QA datasets because it uses real earnings reports with their inherent complexity, but narrower than general financial knowledge benchmarks because it focuses only on historical data interpretation
FinQA scores higher at 60/100 vs tiny-Qwen2ForSequenceClassification-2.5 at 44/100. tiny-Qwen2ForSequenceClassification-2.5 leads on ecosystem, while FinQA is stronger on adoption and quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Enables evaluation of AI systems' ability to extract numerical data from both structured HTML/text tables and unstructured prose within the same document, then reason over the extracted values. The dataset contains questions where relevant data appears in different formats — some figures are in formatted tables with clear row/column headers, while others are embedded in narrative text or footnotes — requiring robust parsing and entity linking before computation can occur.
Unique: Combines structured table data with unstructured narrative in the same evaluation, forcing systems to handle format heterogeneity and resolve references across different data representations. Most table QA datasets use clean, isolated tables; this tests real-world document complexity.
vs alternatives: More realistic than isolated table QA benchmarks (like SQA or WikiTableQuestions) because it requires handling narrative context and format mixing, but simpler than full document understanding because tables are already in text format (no OCR needed)
Provides a curated, crowdsourced-annotated dataset of 8,281 question-answer pairs with multi-step reasoning requirements, enabling systematic evaluation of AI systems on financial numerical reasoning. The dataset includes quality control mechanisms through crowdworker annotation, answer validation against ground truth, and coverage across diverse financial metrics and company types within the S&P 500, creating a reproducible evaluation standard for the financial AI community.
Unique: Provides a publicly available, reproducible benchmark specifically designed for financial numerical reasoning with real SEC filings, enabling standardized comparison across different financial AI systems. Most financial datasets are proprietary or synthetic; this is open-source and authentic.
vs alternatives: More specialized and challenging than generic QA benchmarks (SQuAD, MRQA) because it requires financial domain knowledge and multi-step arithmetic, but narrower in scope than comprehensive financial understanding benchmarks because it focuses only on numerical reasoning
Assesses AI systems' ability to perform multi-hop reasoning by requiring them to locate and combine information from different sections of earnings reports. Questions may require finding a figure in the income statement, then locating a related metric in the balance sheet, then performing arithmetic across both — testing whether models can maintain context across document boundaries and understand relationships between different financial statement sections.
Unique: Embeds multi-hop reasoning requirements within authentic financial documents where hops correspond to real relationships between financial statement sections, rather than synthetic reasoning chains. This tests whether models understand domain structure, not just generic multi-hop patterns.
vs alternatives: More realistic than synthetic multi-hop datasets (HotpotQA, 2WikiMultiHopQA) because reasoning hops follow actual financial relationships, but less controlled because document structure varies and reasoning paths are implicit rather than explicitly annotated
Enables evaluation of whether AI systems can identify which arithmetic operations (addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, comparison) are required to answer financial questions, then execute them correctly. The dataset implicitly tests operation selection — a question asking 'what is the profit margin' requires division (net income / revenue), while 'what is total assets' requires addition — forcing models to understand financial semantics before applying math.
Unique: Embeds arithmetic operation selection within financial domain context, requiring models to understand that 'margin' semantically maps to division and 'total' maps to addition. This tests semantic grounding of operations, not just arithmetic execution.
vs alternatives: More semantically grounded than generic math word problem datasets because operation selection is implicit in financial terminology, but less explicit than datasets with annotated operation types because operations must be inferred
Provides evaluation capability for AI systems to compare financial metrics across multiple S&P 500 companies or aggregate metrics across different time periods within the same company's earnings reports. While individual questions reference single documents, the dataset structure enables evaluation of systems that can retrieve and compare relevant companies, requiring understanding of which metrics are comparable across entities and how to normalize for company size or accounting differences.
Unique: Provides a foundation for evaluating cross-company financial comparison by including diverse S&P 500 companies with different business models and scales, enabling assessment of whether systems can normalize and compare metrics appropriately. Most financial QA datasets focus on single-document questions.
vs alternatives: Enables cross-company evaluation unlike single-document QA datasets, but requires external retrieval and comparison logic because the dataset itself contains only single-document questions