| 0 |
| Quality | 0 | 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Starting Price | $1.50e-7 per prompt token | $6.00e-7 per prompt token |
| Capabilities | 8 decomposed | 11 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Solar Pro 3 implements a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture with 102B total parameters but only activates 12B parameters per forward pass through learned gating mechanisms that route tokens to specialized expert subnetworks. This selective activation pattern reduces computational cost while maintaining model capacity, using sparse expert selection rather than dense transformer layers for each token position.
Unique: Upstage's MoE design achieves 12B active parameters from 102B total through learned gating that routes tokens to specialized experts, rather than using dense attention across all parameters like GPT-4 or Claude, enabling 8-9x parameter efficiency ratio
vs alternatives: More parameter-efficient than dense 70B models (Llama 2 70B, Mistral) while maintaining comparable reasoning capability, with lower per-token inference cost than dense alternatives due to sparse activation
Solar Pro 3 maintains conversation state across multiple turns by accepting full conversation history in each API request, with support for extended context windows that allow retention of longer dialogue histories and document context. The model processes the entire conversation context through its MoE routing mechanism, enabling coherent multi-turn interactions without explicit memory management.
Unique: Solar Pro 3 processes full conversation history through its MoE routing on each turn, allowing the gating mechanism to selectively activate experts based on cumulative dialogue context rather than treating each turn independently
vs alternatives: Simpler integration than models requiring external memory systems (like RAG with vector databases), but trades off scalability — suitable for single-session conversations rather than persistent multi-session memory
Solar Pro 3 generates syntactically correct code across multiple programming languages (Python, JavaScript, Java, C++, SQL, etc.) by leveraging its 102B parameter capacity trained on diverse code corpora. The MoE architecture routes code-generation tokens to specialized experts trained on language-specific patterns, enabling context-aware completions that respect language idioms and frameworks.
Unique: MoE routing allows Solar Pro 3 to maintain separate expert pathways for different programming languages and paradigms, enabling language-specific code generation without diluting model capacity across all languages equally
vs alternatives: Broader language support than specialized models like Codex, with lower inference cost than dense models like GPT-4 Code Interpreter due to sparse activation
Solar Pro 3 accepts system prompts that define behavioral constraints and task-specific instructions, then follows those instructions consistently across multiple turns. The model decomposes complex tasks into subtasks by analyzing the system prompt and user request, routing different reasoning steps through appropriate expert pathways in its MoE architecture.
Unique: Solar Pro 3's MoE architecture allows different experts to specialize in instruction interpretation vs. task execution, potentially improving adherence to complex system prompts compared to dense models that must balance these concerns across all parameters
vs alternatives: More flexible than fine-tuned models for behavior customization, with lower cost than GPT-4 while maintaining comparable instruction-following capability
Solar Pro 3 performs semantic analysis and reasoning by processing input text through its 102B parameter capacity, with MoE routing directing reasoning-heavy tokens to expert subnetworks trained on logical inference and knowledge synthesis. The model can answer questions requiring multi-step reasoning, identify semantic relationships, and synthesize information across multiple concepts.
Unique: MoE architecture enables Solar Pro 3 to maintain separate reasoning pathways for different knowledge domains, potentially improving semantic understanding in specialized areas without reducing general-purpose capability
vs alternatives: Comparable reasoning capability to GPT-3.5 with lower inference latency and cost due to sparse activation, though may underperform GPT-4 on highly complex multi-step reasoning
Solar Pro 3 supports streaming inference through OpenRouter's API, returning tokens incrementally as they are generated rather than waiting for the complete response. This enables real-time display of model output in user interfaces, reducing perceived latency and allowing users to see reasoning progress as it unfolds.
Unique: OpenRouter's streaming implementation for Solar Pro 3 leverages the MoE architecture's token-by-token routing, allowing streaming to begin immediately without waiting for expert selection decisions to complete across the full sequence
vs alternatives: Streaming support is standard across modern LLM APIs, but Solar Pro 3's sparse activation may enable faster time-to-first-token compared to dense models due to reduced computation per initial token
Solar Pro 3 is accessed exclusively through OpenRouter's REST API, accepting configuration parameters like temperature, top-p, top-k, and max-tokens to control output randomness and length. The API abstracts away model deployment complexity, handling load balancing and infrastructure while exposing a simple HTTP interface for inference requests.
Unique: OpenRouter abstracts Solar Pro 3's MoE infrastructure behind a unified API interface, allowing developers to access the model without understanding or managing sparse expert routing, load balancing, or distributed inference
vs alternatives: Simpler integration than self-hosted models (no deployment required), with comparable pricing to other MoE models but lower cost than dense models like GPT-4 due to efficient sparse activation
Solar Pro 3 generates original content across multiple genres and styles (marketing copy, creative fiction, technical documentation, etc.) by conditioning on style descriptors and examples in prompts. The model's 102B parameters provide sufficient capacity for diverse writing styles, with MoE routing allowing different experts to specialize in different genres.
Unique: Solar Pro 3's MoE architecture allows different experts to specialize in different writing styles and genres, enabling more consistent style adherence compared to dense models that must balance all styles across shared parameters
vs alternatives: More cost-effective than GPT-4 for high-volume content generation, with comparable quality to specialized writing models like Claude for most use cases
GLM-4.5 uses a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture to dynamically route tokens through specialized expert networks based on input characteristics, enabling efficient processing of 128k-token contexts without proportional latency increases. The MoE design allows selective expert activation per token, reducing computational overhead while maintaining reasoning depth across extended conversations and multi-document analysis tasks typical of agent-based workflows.
Unique: Mixture-of-Experts routing specifically tuned for agent workloads rather than generic dense models; expert activation patterns are optimized for tool-use sequences and multi-step reasoning rather than general language tasks
vs alternatives: Outperforms dense models like GPT-4 Turbo on agent tasks within 128k context by routing computational budget to relevant experts, reducing latency and cost vs. models that process all tokens through identical layers
GLM-4.5 implements native function calling through a schema-based registry where tools are defined as JSON schemas with parameter constraints, type validation, and description metadata. The model learns to emit structured tool invocations that map directly to function signatures, enabling deterministic tool orchestration without post-processing or regex parsing. Integration with OpenRouter's API exposes this via standard function-calling parameters compatible with OpenAI's format.
Unique: Schema-based function calling is trained directly into the model weights rather than implemented as post-hoc decoding constraints, allowing the model to learn semantic relationships between tool purposes and input context during training
vs alternatives: More reliable than constraint-based function calling (e.g., Guidance, LMQL) because tool selection is learned rather than enforced, reducing parsing failures and enabling the model to reason about tool applicability
Z.ai: GLM 4.5 scores higher at 24/100 vs Upstage: Solar Pro 3 at 23/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
GLM-4.5 can be used for batch inference through OpenRouter's API, enabling cost-optimized processing of large numbers of requests. Batch processing typically offers reduced pricing compared to real-time API calls and is suitable for non-urgent inference tasks. The model can process batches of prompts efficiently, with results returned after processing completes. This is valuable for agents running scheduled tasks or processing large datasets.
Unique: Batch processing is offered through OpenRouter's unified API rather than a separate batch service, enabling seamless switching between real-time and batch modes with the same client code
vs alternatives: More cost-effective than real-time API for high-volume inference; simpler than managing separate batch infrastructure because OpenRouter handles queuing and result delivery
GLM-4.5 maintains coherent conversation state across turns by encoding prior messages into a compressed representation that persists within the 128k context window. The model uses attention mechanisms to selectively retrieve relevant prior context, enabling agents to reference earlier decisions, tool results, and user preferences without explicit memory management. This is particularly effective for agent workflows where state accumulation (e.g., task progress, discovered facts) must inform subsequent actions.
Unique: Implicit memory management through attention-based context selection rather than explicit memory modules; the model learns which prior turns are relevant without separate retrieval or summarization steps
vs alternatives: More efficient than explicit memory systems (e.g., LangChain's ConversationBufferMemory) because attention is computed once during inference rather than requiring separate retrieval and summarization passes
GLM-4.5 generates code across 40+ programming languages by leveraging training data that includes diverse codebases and syntax patterns. The model understands language-specific idioms, library conventions, and structural patterns (e.g., async/await in JavaScript, type hints in Python, generics in Java) without explicit language-specific modules. Generation is context-aware, respecting indentation, existing code style, and project conventions when completing or extending code snippets.
Unique: Language-agnostic code generation trained on diverse codebases rather than language-specific fine-tuning; the model generalizes syntax patterns across languages, enabling reasonable code generation even for less common languages
vs alternatives: Broader language coverage than specialized models like Codex (which emphasizes Python/JavaScript) but lower quality on niche languages compared to language-specific models; better for polyglot teams than single-language specialists
GLM-4.5 is trained on extensive technical documentation, API references, and code examples, enabling it to understand and reason about complex technical concepts, library APIs, and system architectures. The model can parse API schemas (OpenAPI, GraphQL, Protocol Buffers), understand parameter constraints and type systems, and generate code that correctly uses APIs based on documentation. This is particularly valuable for agent workflows that must interact with external systems.
Unique: Semantic understanding of API schemas and documentation is learned from training data rather than implemented as a separate schema parser; the model reasons about API semantics holistically
vs alternatives: More flexible than code-generation-only models because it understands API semantics and can reason about correctness; better than generic LLMs for technical tasks because training includes extensive API documentation
GLM-4.5 can generate responses that explicitly show reasoning steps, enabling transparency into how conclusions were reached. When prompted with chain-of-thought patterns, the model generates intermediate reasoning steps before final answers, making it suitable for applications requiring explainability or verification. This is implemented through training on reasoning-annotated data and prompt patterns that encourage step-by-step decomposition.
Unique: Chain-of-thought reasoning is trained directly into the model rather than implemented as a decoding strategy; the model learns to generate reasoning steps as part of its core training objective
vs alternatives: More natural and coherent reasoning steps than prompt-injection approaches (e.g., appending 'think step by step') because reasoning is learned as a first-class capability
GLM-4.5 supports multiple languages (Chinese, English, and others) with training that enables cross-lingual reasoning — understanding concepts expressed in one language and reasoning about them in another. The model can translate, summarize, and reason across languages without language-specific degradation. This is particularly valuable for global applications and agents that must operate in multilingual environments.
Unique: Cross-lingual reasoning is learned from multilingual training data rather than implemented as separate language-specific models; the model develops a shared representation across languages
vs alternatives: More efficient than maintaining separate models per language because a single model handles all languages; better for cross-lingual reasoning than language-specific models because the shared representation enables concept transfer
+3 more capabilities