| 0 |
| 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 8 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Enables searching video content by semantic meaning across visual frames, audio transcripts, and metadata using embeddings-based indexing. The system processes video frames and audio streams through multimodal encoders, stores embeddings in a vector database, and retrieves relevant segments via similarity search. This allows developers to query videos with natural language like 'find scenes with people laughing' without manual tagging.
Unique: Combines frame-level visual embeddings with synchronized audio transcript embeddings in a single vector index, enabling cross-modal search where a text query can match visual scenes or spoken dialogue simultaneously, rather than treating video as separate visual and audio streams
vs alternatives: Outperforms keyword-based video search (which requires manual tagging) and frame-by-frame visual search (which ignores audio context) by indexing both modalities together, enabling semantic queries that understand intent across the full video content
Automatically transcribes video audio into text across 100+ languages with speaker identification and timestamps. The system uses speech-to-text models with language detection, speaker diarization to separate multiple speakers, and alignment of transcripts to video frames. Output includes speaker labels, confidence scores, and precise timing for each spoken segment, enabling subtitle generation, searchability, and accessibility features.
Unique: Implements end-to-end speaker diarization integrated with multilingual ASR in a single pipeline, automatically detecting language and speaker changes without separate preprocessing steps, and outputs speaker-aware transcripts with frame-accurate timing for video synchronization
vs alternatives: Faster and more cost-effective than manual transcription or hiring translators; more accurate than simple speech-to-text without diarization because it preserves speaker identity; supports more languages natively than most video editing software
Automates video editing decisions by analyzing content semantics to suggest or execute cuts, transitions, and scene organization. The system understands shot composition, pacing, dialogue flow, and visual continuity through frame analysis and transcript understanding, then generates edit decisions (cut points, transition types, duration adjustments) that can be applied directly to video timelines. Developers can specify editing rules (e.g., 'cut between speaker changes', 'add transitions at scene breaks') that are applied intelligently across the video.
Unique: Combines visual frame analysis (shot detection, composition, motion) with transcript-aware editing (speaker changes, dialogue pacing) to generate semantically-informed edit decisions, rather than purely temporal or technical heuristics, enabling edits that respect content meaning
vs alternatives: More intelligent than rule-based auto-editing (which uses only timecode or audio levels) because it understands content context; faster than manual editing but requires less creative input than fully manual workflows; more predictable than generic ML-based suggestions because rules are developer-specified
Generates synthetic video content (backgrounds, objects, scenes, transitions) using diffusion models or generative AI, integrated with video editing workflows. The system can fill in missing frames, extend scenes, generate background variations, or create transition effects based on text prompts or visual context. Generated content is automatically color-graded and composited to match surrounding footage, enabling seamless integration into edited videos.
Unique: Integrates generative synthesis directly into video editing pipelines with automatic color matching and temporal coherence optimization, rather than generating isolated frames; enables developers to specify generation regions and constraints declaratively within editing rules
vs alternatives: Faster than traditional VFX or reshooting; more controllable than generic image generation because it understands video context and temporal constraints; produces more coherent results than frame-by-frame generation because it optimizes for temporal consistency
Clones speaker voices from video audio and synthesizes new speech in the cloned voice, enabling dubbing, voice-over replacement, or multilingual audio generation. The system extracts voice characteristics from a reference audio sample, trains a lightweight voice model, and generates new speech with matching prosody, accent, and tone. Synthesized audio is automatically synchronized to video frames and mixed with background audio.
Unique: Implements speaker-specific voice modeling that preserves prosody and accent characteristics from reference audio, then synthesizes new speech with matching voice identity; integrates automatic audio-to-video synchronization and lip-sync adjustment rather than requiring separate tools
vs alternatives: More natural-sounding than generic text-to-speech because it preserves speaker identity; faster and cheaper than hiring voice actors for dubbing; more flexible than pre-recorded dialogue because it can generate new speech on-demand
Analyzes video content for policy violations, inappropriate material, or safety concerns using computer vision and NLP models. The system scans frames for explicit content, violence, hate speech, or other flagged categories, generates moderation reports with timestamps and confidence scores, and can automatically blur, mute, or flag problematic segments. Developers can define custom moderation policies and thresholds.
Unique: Combines frame-level visual moderation with transcript-based text moderation in a unified pipeline, enabling detection of policy violations that span both modalities (e.g., hate speech paired with violent imagery); supports developer-defined custom policies rather than only pre-trained categories
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than image-only moderation because it analyzes audio and text context; more flexible than fixed policy systems because custom rules can be defined; faster than manual review but requires human oversight for enforcement
Exposes VideoDB capabilities through the Model Context Protocol (MCP), enabling AI agents and LLMs to call video editing, search, and analysis functions as tools. The system implements MCP server endpoints for each capability, handles request/response serialization, manages authentication, and provides structured tool schemas that agents can discover and invoke. Agents can chain multiple VideoDB operations (e.g., search → transcribe → edit) in a single workflow.
Unique: Implements full MCP server for VideoDB with structured tool schemas for each capability, enabling agents to discover, reason about, and chain video operations; handles authentication and state management transparently so agents can focus on task logic
vs alternatives: More standardized than custom API integrations because MCP is a protocol standard; enables agent portability across different LLM platforms; provides better agent reasoning because tool schemas are explicit and discoverable
Processes multiple videos asynchronously through a job queue system, enabling large-scale video analysis and editing without blocking. The system accepts batch job definitions (list of videos + operations), queues them for processing, provides job status tracking, and delivers results via webhooks or polling. Developers can monitor progress, retry failed jobs, and parallelize processing across multiple workers.
Unique: Implements distributed job queue with per-video operation tracking and failure recovery, allowing developers to submit large batches and receive results asynchronously; supports heterogeneous operations (different videos can have different processing pipelines in a single batch)
vs alternatives: More scalable than synchronous API calls because processing is asynchronous; more flexible than fixed batch templates because operation specifications are per-video; provides better visibility than fire-and-forget systems because job status is trackable
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
Supabase scores higher at 42/100 vs VideoDB at 25/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities