| 0 |
| 0 |
| Ecosystem | 1 | 1 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 15 decomposed | 12 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Organizes 300+ LLM ecosystem resources across 25+ categories using a bilingual (Chinese/English) hierarchical markdown structure deployed via Jekyll GitHub Pages. The catalog uses a consistent section pattern with category headers, resource links, and descriptions that enable both human browsing and programmatic discovery through GitHub's raw markdown API. Each resource is tagged with domain (foundation, deployment, multimodal, etc.) enabling cross-domain navigation and filtering.
Unique: Uses a bilingual hierarchical organization (Chinese-first naming convention) across 25+ domain categories (Foundation & Training, RAG Systems, Agentic RL, Multimodal Systems, etc.) with 1,278-line single-file architecture enabling GitHub Pages deployment without backend infrastructure. Integrates DeepWiki architectural analysis to provide technical context for each category section.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive and domain-specific than Papers with Code or Hugging Face Model Hub for LLM ecosystem discovery; bilingual support and architectural depth analysis differentiates from English-only awesome lists.
Catalogs 40+ resources spanning data processing, model training, fine-tuning frameworks, and reinforcement learning approaches. The catalog maps the complete pipeline from raw data curation through foundation model training, including tools for data annotation (Label Studio, Argilla), preprocessing (Hugging Face Datasets), fine-tuning (Unsloth, LLaMA-Factory), and agentic RL (veRL, AReaL). Resources are organized by training methodology (supervised fine-tuning, RLHF, DPO, GRPO) enabling builders to select appropriate frameworks for their training objectives.
Unique: Uniquely maps agentic reinforcement learning frameworks (veRL, AReaL, slime, Agent Lightning) alongside traditional fine-tuning, reflecting the shift toward reasoning model training. Includes specialized sections for GRPO (Group Relative Policy Optimization) and reasoning model training pipelines used in DeepSeek-R1 replication.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than Papers with Code for training infrastructure; includes both data processing and RL training frameworks in one taxonomy, whereas most resources separate these concerns.
Catalogs 15+ resources for advanced reasoning models (OpenAI o1, o3, DeepSeek-R1) and open-source reasoning model implementations. The catalog maps how reasoning models differ from standard LLMs (chain-of-thought training, test-time compute, verification), including training approaches (GRPO, RL-based reasoning) and inference patterns. Resources span both commercial reasoning APIs and open-source implementations, enabling builders to understand and implement advanced reasoning capabilities.
Unique: Focuses specifically on advanced reasoning models (o1, o3, DeepSeek-R1) and their training approaches (GRPO, RL-based reasoning), reflecting the emerging frontier of reasoning-focused LLMs. Includes both commercial APIs and open-source implementations, enabling builders to understand and replicate reasoning capabilities.
vs alternatives: Uniquely focused on reasoning model training and implementation; most LLM resources treat reasoning as a capability of standard models rather than a distinct model category.
Catalogs 25+ small and efficient LLM models (Phi, TinyLlama, Mistral 7B, Qwen, Gemma) organized by optimization approach: quantization (GPTQ, AWQ, GGUF), distillation, pruning, and architectural efficiency. The catalog maps how efficient models trade off capability for size/speed, including benchmarks on standard tasks. Resources span both pre-optimized models and optimization frameworks, enabling builders to select or create efficient models for resource-constrained deployments.
Unique: Organizes efficient models by optimization approach (quantization, distillation, pruning, architectural efficiency) rather than just model name. Includes both pre-optimized models (Phi, TinyLlama) and optimization frameworks, reflecting the spectrum from ready-to-use to custom optimization.
vs alternatives: More optimization-technique-focused than individual model documentation; enables builders to understand efficiency tradeoffs and select or create efficient models matching their constraints.
Catalogs resources for Model Context Protocol (MCP), a standardized protocol for LLM context management and tool integration. The catalog maps MCP implementations, client libraries, and server implementations, including integration patterns with LLM applications. Resources span both MCP specification documentation and practical implementations, enabling builders to understand and implement MCP-based context management and tool orchestration.
Unique: Focuses specifically on Model Context Protocol (MCP) as a standardized approach to context management and tool integration, distinct from custom tool calling implementations. Maps MCP specification, client libraries, and server implementations, reflecting the emerging standardization of LLM context protocols.
vs alternatives: Uniquely focused on MCP standardization; most LLM resources treat tool integration as framework-specific rather than protocol-based.
Catalogs 50+ learning resources organized by format: books (LLM fundamentals, prompt engineering, RAG), courses (university courses, online platforms), and technical papers (foundational research, recent advances). The catalog maps resources by topic (transformer architecture, fine-tuning, agents, multimodal) and audience level (beginner, intermediate, advanced), enabling learners to find appropriate educational materials for their background and goals.
Unique: Organizes learning resources by format (books, courses, papers) and topic (transformers, fine-tuning, agents, multimodal) rather than just listing materials. Includes both foundational resources and cutting-edge research papers, reflecting the breadth of LLM knowledge.
vs alternatives: More topic-and-format-focused than general learning platforms; enables learners to find specific educational materials for their background and goals.
Catalogs 10+ interactive platforms (Hugging Face Spaces, OpenRouter, Chatbot Arena, Together Playground) enabling side-by-side model comparison and evaluation. The catalog maps how platforms enable comparative evaluation (same prompt across models, user voting, leaderboards) and integration with multiple model providers. Resources span both community-driven arenas (Chatbot Arena) and commercial platforms (OpenRouter), enabling builders to evaluate models before integration.
Unique: Focuses on interactive platforms enabling side-by-side model comparison and community-driven evaluation, distinct from automated benchmarking. Includes both community arenas (Chatbot Arena) and commercial platforms (OpenRouter), reflecting the spectrum from open to managed evaluation.
vs alternatives: More interactive-and-comparative-focused than static benchmarks; enables real-time model evaluation and community-driven quality assessment.
Aggregates 30+ inference serving frameworks (vLLM, TensorRT-LLM, SGLang, Ollama, LM Studio) organized by deployment pattern (local, cloud, edge, batch). The catalog maps frameworks to specific optimization techniques (quantization, batching, KV-cache optimization) and hardware targets (CPU, GPU, mobile). Resources include both open-source inference engines and commercial serving platforms, enabling builders to select frameworks matching their latency, throughput, and cost requirements.
Unique: Organizes inference frameworks by deployment pattern (local, cloud, edge, batch) rather than just framework name, with explicit mapping to optimization techniques (quantization, batching, KV-cache) and hardware targets. Includes both open-source engines (vLLM, SGLang, Ollama) and commercial platforms (Together AI, Replicate).
vs alternatives: More deployment-pattern-focused than framework-specific documentation; enables builders to find solutions by use case (low-latency API, batch processing, edge deployment) rather than learning individual framework APIs.
+7 more capabilities
Crawls 11+ heterogeneous platforms (Zhihu, Weibo, Bilibili, Twitter, Reddit, HackerNews, etc.) and RSS feeds using platform-specific scrapers, normalizes disparate data schemas into a unified NewsItem model, and deduplicates content across sources using fuzzy title matching and URL canonicalization. The system maintains platform-specific metadata (rank, heat value, engagement metrics) while presenting a single normalized feed, enabling cross-platform trend detection that would be invisible within individual platform silos.
Unique: Implements platform-specific crawler modules with unified NewsItem schema and fuzzy deduplication across 11+ heterogeneous sources (Chinese + international), rather than relying on single-platform APIs or generic RSS parsing. Maintains platform-specific metadata (rank × 0.6 + frequency × 0.3 + platform hot value × 0.1) for weighted hotspot scoring.
vs alternatives: Covers more platforms (especially Chinese social media) with deeper metadata extraction than generic RSS aggregators, and provides unified deduplication across sources unlike single-platform monitoring tools.
Implements a multi-stage filtering pipeline that matches news items against user-defined keywords using regex patterns, required word lists, and excluded word lists. The system applies frequency-based scoring (keyword occurrence count) combined with platform hotspot weights to rank filtered results. Configuration is stored in frequency_words.txt with support for regex patterns, AND/OR/NOT boolean operators, and per-keyword weighting. Filtering occurs at collection time (reducing storage) and again at report generation time (enabling dynamic reconfiguration without re-crawling).
Unique: Combines regex pattern matching with frequency-based scoring and platform hotspot weighting (rank × 0.6 + frequency × 0.3 + platform hot value × 0.1) in a two-stage pipeline (collection-time and report-time filtering). Supports dynamic reconfiguration without re-crawling by applying filters at report generation.
TrendRadar scores higher at 58/100 vs awesome-LLM-resources at 38/100. awesome-LLM-resources leads on quality, while TrendRadar is stronger on adoption and ecosystem.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: More flexible than simple keyword matching (supports regex and boolean logic) and more efficient than semantic filtering (no LLM overhead), making it suitable for real-time filtering at scale.
Detects newly emerged topics by comparing current crawl results against historical data stored in the system. Topics are marked as 🆕 (new) if they appear for the first time in the current crawl or if their hotspot rank increased significantly compared to previous crawls. The system tracks topic emergence velocity (how quickly a topic rises in rankings) and flags topics with unusual acceleration. New topic detection is performed at report generation time, enabling dynamic detection without re-crawling. The system maintains a historical hotspot index for comparison.
Unique: Detects new topics by comparing current hotspot rankings against historical data, marking topics with significant rank increases as 🆕. Tracks emergence velocity to distinguish breaking news from sustained trends.
vs alternatives: More efficient than semantic similarity detection (no LLM overhead) and more accurate than simple first-appearance detection (accounts for re-emerging topics), but requires historical baseline data.
Provides a web-based UI for editing TrendRadar configuration files (config.yaml, frequency_words.txt, timeline.yaml) with real-time validation and preview. The editor supports: (1) syntax highlighting for YAML and regex, (2) validation of keyword patterns (regex compilation check), (3) preview of filtered results based on current keyword configuration, (4) drag-and-drop channel configuration, (5) schedule preview (shows next 10 execution times). Changes are validated before saving, preventing configuration errors. The editor is optional; users can edit config files directly.
Unique: Provides web-based configuration editor with real-time validation, regex preview, and schedule visualization. Enables non-technical users to configure TrendRadar without editing YAML files.
vs alternatives: More user-friendly than manual YAML editing and provides validation feedback, but adds operational complexity compared to file-based configuration.
Integrates LiteLLM to provide vendor-agnostic AI analysis and summarization of filtered news items. Users configure their preferred LLM provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, Ollama, local models, etc.) once in config.yaml, and the system automatically routes analysis requests to that provider. The AI analysis capability includes: (1) automated summarization of long articles into key points, (2) sentiment analysis (positive/negative/neutral), (3) trend prediction based on historical patterns, and (4) custom analysis prompts. Analysis results are cached to avoid redundant API calls and can be pushed directly to notification channels.
Unique: Uses LiteLLM abstraction layer to support any LLM provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, Ollama, local models) with single configuration, enabling provider switching without code changes. Caches analysis results to reduce redundant API calls and costs.
vs alternatives: More flexible than hardcoded OpenAI integration (supports any LiteLLM provider) and cheaper than dedicated sentiment analysis APIs (can use local models), but slower than rule-based sentiment analysis.
Leverages LiteLLM to translate news content from source languages (primarily Chinese) to target languages (English, etc.) on-demand. The system detects source language automatically (via langdetect or similar), caches translations to avoid re-translating identical content, and batches translation requests to reduce API calls. Translations are stored alongside original content, enabling bilingual reports and multi-language notification delivery. Translation can be triggered at collection time (all news) or report time (only filtered news).
Unique: Implements provider-agnostic translation via LiteLLM with automatic language detection, content-based caching, and batch request optimization. Stores translations alongside originals for bilingual report generation.
vs alternatives: More flexible than dedicated translation APIs (supports any LiteLLM provider) and cheaper than commercial translation services when using local models, but slower than specialized translation APIs.
Implements a notification abstraction layer supporting 9+ delivery channels (WeChat, WeWork, Feishu, Telegram, Email, ntfy, Bark, Slack, etc.). Each channel has a provider-specific formatter that converts normalized news items into channel-appropriate messages (e.g., WeChat card format, Telegram markdown, email HTML). The system batches notifications atomically—all news items for a report are sent as a single batch to each channel, ensuring consistency and reducing API calls. Message formatting respects channel constraints (character limits, attachment limits, etc.) and supports templating for customization.
Unique: Implements atomic message batching across 9+ heterogeneous channels with provider-specific formatters and constraint-aware truncation. Single configuration enables simultaneous delivery to WeChat, WeWork, Feishu, Telegram, Email, ntfy, Bark, Slack, etc. without code changes.
vs alternatives: Supports more channels (especially Chinese platforms like WeWork, Feishu) than generic notification services, and batching reduces API calls and spam compared to per-item notifications.
Exposes TrendRadar's data and analysis capabilities as an MCP server, enabling AI agents and LLM applications to query trends, perform analysis, and generate insights through natural language. The MCP server implements tools for: (1) querying filtered news by keyword/date/platform, (2) retrieving trend statistics and hotspot rankings, (3) running custom analysis on news subsets, (4) generating reports in various formats. Clients (Claude, other LLM agents) can invoke these tools via MCP protocol, enabling conversational exploration of trends without direct database access. The server maintains state across multiple requests, allowing multi-turn conversations about trends.
Unique: Implements full MCP server exposing trend data and analysis tools to LLM agents, enabling conversational queries and multi-turn analysis workflows. Maintains state across requests and supports complex tool invocations (filtering, analysis, report generation).
vs alternatives: Enables conversational access to trends (vs. API-only access) and integrates with LLM agent workflows (vs. standalone tools), but adds operational complexity compared to simple REST APIs.
+4 more capabilities