| 0 |
| Quality | 0 | 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Starting Price | $2.00e-7 per prompt token | $6.00e-7 per prompt token |
| Capabilities | 9 decomposed | 12 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Grok Code Fast 1 performs multi-step reasoning over code problems with intermediate reasoning traces exposed in the response stream, allowing developers to inspect and validate the model's decision-making process at each step. The architecture uses chain-of-thought decomposition internally, surfacing thought tokens alongside final outputs so users can debug reasoning failures or steer the model toward better solutions through follow-up prompts.
Unique: Exposes reasoning traces as part of the response stream rather than hiding them, enabling developers to inspect intermediate decision-making and steer the model via follow-up prompts based on visible reasoning quality
vs alternatives: Provides interpretable reasoning for code tasks at lower cost than o1/o3 models while maintaining faster inference speeds than full-chain reasoning models
Grok Code Fast 1 is optimized for speed and cost efficiency in code generation tasks, using a smaller model architecture and inference optimizations to reduce latency and token consumption compared to larger reasoning models. The model balances reasoning capability with inference speed through selective computation — applying deep reasoning only to complex code patterns while using faster heuristics for routine completions.
Unique: Combines reasoning capability with inference-time optimizations (likely selective computation and model quantization) to achieve sub-second latency and 40-60% lower token costs than comparable reasoning models
vs alternatives: Faster and cheaper than Claude 3.5 Sonnet for routine code tasks while maintaining reasoning visibility that Copilot lacks
Grok Code Fast 1 supports iterative refinement of code solutions through multi-turn conversations where developers can provide feedback, constraints, or corrections based on the model's visible reasoning traces. The model maintains conversation context across turns, allowing agents to steer the model toward better solutions by pointing out reasoning errors or requesting alternative approaches without re-submitting the full problem context.
Unique: Exposes reasoning traces in multi-turn context, enabling developers to provide targeted feedback on specific reasoning steps rather than just requesting 'better code', creating tighter feedback loops for agentic systems
vs alternatives: More interpretable than Copilot for iterative refinement because reasoning is visible; faster iteration cycles than o1 due to lower latency per turn
Grok Code Fast 1 can generate test cases, validate code correctness, and identify potential bugs through reasoning-based analysis of code logic and edge cases. The model uses its reasoning capability to trace through code execution paths, identify boundary conditions, and suggest test cases that cover critical scenarios, with reasoning traces showing the validation logic applied.
Unique: Uses visible reasoning traces to explain WHY code might fail, not just THAT it might fail, allowing developers to understand the validation logic and adjust code accordingly
vs alternatives: More transparent than black-box static analysis tools because reasoning is visible; faster than manual code review while providing reasoning justification
Grok Code Fast 1 streams responses token-by-token, including intermediate reasoning tokens, allowing developers to consume partial results in real-time and cancel long-running requests early. The streaming architecture separates reasoning tokens from output tokens, enabling clients to display reasoning progress separately from final code output or to aggregate reasoning before displaying final results.
Unique: Separates reasoning tokens from output tokens in the stream, allowing clients to handle reasoning visualization independently from code output rendering, enabling more sophisticated UX patterns
vs alternatives: More granular streaming than standard LLM APIs because reasoning is exposed as distinct tokens; enables earlier user feedback than batch-only APIs
Grok Code Fast 1 supports code generation across multiple programming languages (Python, JavaScript, TypeScript, Java, C++, Go, Rust, C#, PHP, etc.) with language-aware reasoning that understands language-specific idioms, standard libraries, and best practices. The model applies language-specific reasoning patterns to generate idiomatic code rather than generic translations.
Unique: Uses language-aware reasoning to generate idiomatic code for each target language rather than mechanical translation, understanding language-specific patterns, standard libraries, and best practices
vs alternatives: More idiomatic than simple code translation tools because reasoning understands language semantics; faster than manual refactoring across languages
Grok Code Fast 1 performs code completion that understands surrounding code context, including variable definitions, function signatures, imported libraries, and project structure, to generate contextually appropriate completions. The model uses reasoning to infer intent from context rather than simple pattern matching, enabling more accurate completions for complex scenarios.
Unique: Uses reasoning-based context understanding rather than simple pattern matching or n-gram models, enabling completions that understand semantic intent and project conventions
vs alternatives: More context-aware than Copilot for large files because reasoning can integrate more context; faster than full-file analysis because reasoning is selective
Grok Code Fast 1 can refactor code while maintaining semantic equivalence, using reasoning to understand the original intent and constraints before suggesting improvements. The model reasons about refactoring trade-offs (readability vs performance, maintainability vs brevity) and exposes this reasoning so developers can understand why specific refactoring choices were made.
Unique: Exposes reasoning about refactoring trade-offs (readability vs performance, maintainability vs brevity) rather than just suggesting changes, enabling developers to make informed decisions about which refactorings to accept
vs alternatives: More transparent than automated refactoring tools because reasoning is visible; more nuanced than simple pattern-based refactoring because it understands semantic intent
+1 more capabilities
GLM-5 processes extended code contexts (supporting multi-file projects and large codebases) while maintaining semantic understanding of system architecture through attention mechanisms optimized for code structure. The model uses specialized tokenization for programming languages and maintains coherence across thousands of tokens of code context, enabling generation of complex features that respect existing patterns and dependencies.
Unique: Engineered specifically for complex systems design with attention mechanisms tuned for code structure and architectural patterns, rather than generic language modeling — enables understanding of system-wide dependencies and design constraints across extended contexts
vs alternatives: Outperforms general-purpose models on large-scale programming tasks because it's optimized for architectural coherence and long-horizon code generation rather than treating code as generic text
GLM-5 supports extended reasoning chains for agentic workflows through structured prompt patterns that enable step-by-step decomposition of complex tasks. The model can maintain state across multiple turns, reason about tool outputs, and make decisions about next actions — designed for long-horizon agent loops where the model must plan, execute, observe, and adapt across dozens of steps.
Unique: Explicitly engineered for long-horizon agent workflows with architectural patterns optimized for extended reasoning chains, rather than single-turn tool calling — maintains coherence and decision quality across dozens of reasoning steps
vs alternatives: Better suited for multi-step agentic tasks than general-purpose models because reasoning and tool-use patterns are baked into the training, not bolted on via prompt engineering
Z.ai: GLM 5 scores higher at 24/100 vs xAI: Grok Code Fast 1 at 23/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
GLM-5 analyzes code for performance bottlenecks and suggests optimization strategies through understanding of algorithmic complexity, memory management, and system-level performance patterns. The model can identify inefficient algorithms, suggest data structure improvements, and recommend caching or parallelization strategies — enabling targeted performance improvements with understanding of trade-offs.
Unique: Understands algorithmic complexity and system-level performance patterns, enabling identification of fundamental bottlenecks and suggestion of targeted optimizations rather than micro-optimizations
vs alternatives: Identifies more fundamental performance issues than profiling tools because it understands algorithmic complexity and can suggest architectural improvements, not just code-level optimizations
GLM-5 generates comprehensive API specifications, including endpoint definitions, request/response schemas, error handling, and usage examples through understanding of API design best practices and REST/GraphQL patterns. The model can produce OpenAPI/Swagger specifications, generate API documentation, and suggest design improvements — enabling rapid API specification and documentation.
Unique: Generates comprehensive API specifications that follow REST/GraphQL best practices and include error handling, authentication, and usage examples — not just endpoint definitions
vs alternatives: Produces more complete and best-practice-aligned API specifications than simple code-to-spec tools because it understands API design patterns and includes comprehensive documentation
GLM-5 generates high-quality technical documentation, design documents, and architectural specifications through training on expert-level technical writing patterns. The model understands domain-specific terminology, maintains consistency across long documents, and can generate structured documentation (API specs, RFC-style documents, architecture decision records) with appropriate technical depth and precision.
Unique: Trained on expert-level technical documentation patterns and domain-specific terminology, enabling generation of publication-ready documentation with appropriate technical depth rather than generic summaries
vs alternatives: Produces more technically precise and domain-aware documentation than general-purpose models because it understands architectural patterns, trade-offs, and expert writing conventions specific to software engineering
GLM-5 breaks down complex, ambiguous problems into structured task hierarchies and implementation plans through chain-of-thought reasoning patterns. The model can identify dependencies, suggest phased approaches, and generate detailed step-by-step plans for tackling large engineering challenges — useful for translating high-level requirements into actionable development roadmaps.
Unique: Optimized for expert-level problem decomposition through training on complex system design patterns and architectural reasoning, enabling generation of sophisticated multi-phase plans rather than simple task lists
vs alternatives: Produces more sophisticated and architecturally-aware plans than general-purpose models because it understands system design patterns, dependency relationships, and phased implementation strategies
GLM-5 analyzes code for quality issues, architectural violations, and design improvements through patterns learned from expert code review practices. The model can identify performance bottlenecks, suggest refactoring opportunities, flag architectural inconsistencies, and provide detailed feedback on code quality — going beyond simple linting to understand design intent and system-wide implications.
Unique: Trained on expert code review patterns and architectural reasoning, enabling detection of design issues and architectural violations rather than just syntax and style problems
vs alternatives: Provides more sophisticated architectural and design feedback than linting tools because it understands system-wide implications and expert design patterns, not just local code quality
GLM-5 translates code between programming languages while preserving semantic meaning and adapting to language-specific idioms. The model understands language-specific patterns, libraries, and best practices, enabling translation that produces idiomatic code rather than mechanical line-by-line conversions — useful for migrating systems across language ecosystems or supporting polyglot architectures.
Unique: Produces idiomatic, language-specific code rather than mechanical translations because it understands language-specific patterns, libraries, and best practices learned from diverse codebases
vs alternatives: Generates more idiomatic and maintainable translations than simple pattern-matching tools because it understands semantic equivalence and language-specific idioms
+4 more capabilities