| 1 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Starting Price | — | $25/mo |
| Capabilities | 14 decomposed | 15 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Exposes Xiaohongshu social platform capabilities as a set of 13 standardized MCP tools consumable by AI clients (Claude, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Cline, VSCode). The service implements the Model Context Protocol specification on a /mcp endpoint with streamable HTTP transport, translating MCP tool calls into internal service method invocations. Each tool is registered in mcp_server.go with JSON schema definitions and dispatched through mcp_handlers.go to the underlying XiaohongshuService layer.
Unique: Implements full MCP protocol stack in Go with dual interface design (MCP + REST API on same port 18060), allowing both MCP clients and direct HTTP consumers to invoke the same underlying service methods without code duplication. Uses go-rod/rod for browser automation rather than direct API calls because Xiaohongshu lacks a public API.
vs alternatives: First open-source MCP server for Xiaohongshu with 12k+ GitHub stars; competitors either use REST-only APIs or require proprietary integrations, whereas this exposes the full platform through standardized MCP tooling.
Implements a two-phase authentication system: xiaohongshu-login binary handles interactive QR code scanning via headless Chrome, persisting authenticated session cookies to cookies.json; the main xiaohongshu-mcp service reads these cookies on startup and injects them into every subsequent browser session opened via go-rod/rod. This approach bypasses the need for API credentials by reusing the user's authenticated browser context across all platform operations.
Unique: Separates authentication (xiaohongshu-login) from service operation (xiaohongshu-mcp) into two distinct binaries, allowing one-time interactive login followed by unattended service execution. Uses go-rod/rod for headless Chrome automation rather than Selenium or Puppeteer, providing tighter Go integration and lower memory overhead.
vs alternatives: Avoids credential storage entirely by leveraging browser session cookies; competitors using direct API calls require API keys or OAuth tokens, which introduce credential management overhead and security risk.
Manages headless Chrome browser instances through go-rod/rod, implementing session pooling to reuse browser contexts across multiple operations. The service opens a browser instance on startup, injects authenticated cookies into each session, and reuses the browser for subsequent tool invocations. Browser lifecycle is tied to the service lifecycle — the browser is closed when the service shuts down. This approach reduces startup latency compared to opening a new browser for each operation.
Unique: Uses go-rod/rod for browser automation with session pooling, reusing browser instances across multiple operations to reduce startup latency. Injects authenticated cookies into each session, maintaining authentication state without re-authenticating for each operation.
vs alternatives: Browser pooling reduces latency compared to spawning new browsers for each operation; go-rod/rod provides tighter Go integration and lower memory overhead compared to Selenium or Puppeteer.
Extracts post metadata, user information, and engagement metrics by parsing the Xiaohongshu DOM through go-rod/rod's element selection and text extraction APIs. The service uses CSS selectors and XPath queries to locate elements, extract text content, and construct structured data objects. This approach enables operation without reverse-engineering proprietary APIs, but is brittle to HTML structure changes.
Unique: Uses go-rod/rod for DOM parsing and element selection, providing a Go-native approach to web scraping without external dependencies like BeautifulSoup or Cheerio. Extracts structured data directly from the live Xiaohongshu web interface, enabling operation without API reverse-engineering.
vs alternatives: DOM-based extraction works against the live platform without API maintenance; competitors using outdated or reverse-engineered APIs may break when Xiaohongshu updates its backend.
Implements consistent error handling and response serialization across MCP and REST interfaces. The service layer returns structured error objects with error codes, messages, and optional context; mcp_handlers.go and handlers_api.go translate these into protocol-specific responses (MCP error format or HTTP status codes). This design ensures that clients receive consistent error information regardless of which interface they use.
Unique: Implements error handling at the service layer with protocol-agnostic error types, allowing mcp_handlers.go and handlers_api.go to translate errors into protocol-specific formats. This design ensures consistent error semantics across MCP and REST interfaces.
vs alternatives: Centralized error handling reduces code duplication and ensures consistency; competitors with separate error handling paths for each protocol may have inconsistent error messages or codes.
Implements a stateless HTTP server (using Gin framework) where each MCP or REST request opens a fresh browser page/tab within the pooled browser instance, executes the operation, and closes the page. This approach isolates state between requests, preventing cross-request contamination while reusing the browser instance for performance. The server maintains no per-request state — all context is passed through request parameters.
Unique: Implements per-request browser page isolation within a pooled browser instance, balancing performance (reusing browser) with isolation (fresh page per request). Stateless HTTP server design enables horizontal scaling without session affinity or distributed state management.
vs alternatives: Per-request page isolation prevents cross-request state leakage compared to competitors that reuse the same page across multiple requests; stateless design enables horizontal scaling without session management overhead.
Provides two distinct publishing tools: publish_content for text-based posts with optional image attachments, and publish_with_video for video content. Both tools operate through browser automation, constructing the Xiaohongshu post creation form via DOM manipulation and submitting it through the live web interface. The service handles image/video file uploads, caption composition, and hashtag injection before form submission.
Unique: Implements publish_content and publish_with_video as separate MCP tools with distinct parameter schemas, allowing AI clients to choose the appropriate tool based on content type. Uses DOM-based form construction and submission rather than API calls, enabling operation against the live Xiaohongshu web interface without reverse-engineering proprietary APIs.
vs alternatives: Supports both text and video publishing through a single service, whereas most Xiaohongshu automation tools focus only on text; browser automation approach works against the live platform without requiring API maintenance as Xiaohongshu's web UI evolves.
Implements get_feed tool that retrieves the authenticated user's Xiaohongshu feed with cursor-based pagination. The service navigates the feed DOM, extracts post metadata (title, author, engagement metrics, timestamps), and returns paginated results. Cursor tokens encode the position in the feed, enabling clients to request subsequent pages without re-fetching earlier content.
Unique: Uses cursor-based pagination (opaque tokens) rather than offset-based pagination, reducing the risk of duplicate or skipped results when the feed is updated between requests. Extracts feed data via DOM parsing rather than API calls, making it resilient to Xiaohongshu's lack of a public feed API.
vs alternatives: Cursor-based pagination is more robust than offset-based approaches for dynamic feeds; competitors using offset pagination risk returning duplicate posts if new content is inserted during pagination.
+6 more capabilities
Automatically inspects tabular data sources (Google Sheets, Airtable, Excel, CSV, SQL databases) to extract column names, infer field types (text, number, date, checkbox, etc.), and create bidirectional data bindings between UI components and source columns. Uses declarative component-to-column mappings that persist schema changes in real-time, enabling components to automatically reflect upstream data structure modifications without manual rebinding.
Unique: Glide's approach combines automatic schema introspection with declarative component binding, eliminating manual field mapping that competitors like Airtable require. The bidirectional sync model means changes to source column structure automatically propagate to UI components without developer intervention, reducing maintenance overhead for non-technical users.
vs alternatives: Faster to initial app than Airtable (which requires manual field configuration) and more flexible than rigid form builders because it adapts to evolving data structures automatically.
Provides 40+ pre-built, data-aware UI components (forms, tables, calendars, charts, buttons, text inputs, dropdowns, file uploads, maps, etc.) that automatically render responsively across mobile and desktop viewports. Components use a declarative binding syntax to connect to spreadsheet columns, with built-in support for computed fields, conditional visibility, and user-specific data filtering. Layout engine uses CSS Grid/Flexbox under the hood to adapt component sizing and positioning based on screen size without requiring manual breakpoint configuration.
Unique: Glide's component library is tightly integrated with data binding — components are not generic UI elements but data-aware objects that automatically sync with spreadsheet columns. This eliminates the disconnect between UI and data that exists in traditional form builders, where developers must manually wire component values to data sources.
vs alternatives: Faster to build than Bubble (which requires manual component-to-data wiring) and more mobile-optimized than Airtable's grid-centric interface, which prioritizes desktop spreadsheet metaphors over mobile-first design.
Glide scores higher at 70/100 vs xiaohongshu-mcp at 34/100. xiaohongshu-mcp leads on ecosystem, while Glide is stronger on adoption and quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Enables multiple team members to edit apps simultaneously with role-based access control. Supports predefined roles (Owner, Editor, Viewer) with different permission levels: Owners can manage team members and publish apps, Editors can modify app design and data, Viewers can only view published apps. Team member limits vary by plan (2 free, 10 business, custom enterprise). Real-time collaboration on app design is not mentioned, suggesting changes may not be synchronized in real-time between editors.
Unique: Glide's team collaboration is built into the platform, meaning team members don't need separate accounts or complex permission configuration — they're invited via email and assigned roles directly in the app. This is more seamless than tools requiring external identity management.
vs alternatives: More integrated than Airtable (which requires separate workspace management) and simpler than GitHub-based collaboration (which requires version control knowledge), though less sophisticated than enterprise platforms with audit logging and approval workflows.
Provides pre-built app templates for common use cases (inventory management, CRM, project management, expense tracking, etc.) that users can clone and customize. Templates include sample data, pre-configured components, and example workflows, reducing time-to-first-app from hours to minutes. Templates are fully editable, allowing users to modify data sources, components, and workflows to match their specific needs. Template library is curated by Glide and updated regularly with new templates.
Unique: Glide's templates are fully functional apps with sample data and workflows, not just empty scaffolds. This allows users to immediately see how components work together and understand app structure before customizing, reducing the learning curve significantly.
vs alternatives: More complete than Airtable's templates (which are mostly empty bases) and more accessible than building from scratch, though less flexible than code-based frameworks where templates can be parameterized and generated programmatically.
Allows workflows to be triggered on a schedule (daily, weekly, monthly, or custom intervals) without manual intervention. Scheduled workflows execute at specified times and can perform batch operations (process pending records, send daily reports, sync data, etc.). Execution time is in UTC, and the exact scheduling mechanism (cron, quartz, custom) is undocumented. Failed scheduled tasks may or may not retry automatically (retry logic undocumented).
Unique: Glide's scheduled workflows are integrated with the workflow engine, meaning scheduled tasks can execute the same complex logic as event-triggered workflows (conditional logic, multi-step actions, API calls). This is more powerful than simple scheduled email tools because scheduled tasks can perform data transformations and cross-system synchronization.
vs alternatives: More integrated than Zapier's schedule trigger (which is limited to simple actions) and more accessible than cron jobs (which require server access and scripting knowledge), though less transparent about execution guarantees and failure handling than enterprise job schedulers.
Offers Glide Tables, a proprietary managed database alternative to external spreadsheets or databases, with automatic scaling and optimization for Glide apps. Glide Tables are stored in Glide's infrastructure and optimized for the data binding and query patterns used by Glide apps. Scaling limits are plan-dependent (25k-100k rows), with separate 'Big Tables' tier for larger datasets (exact scaling limits undocumented). Automatic backups and disaster recovery are mentioned but details are undocumented.
Unique: Glide Tables are optimized specifically for Glide's data binding and query patterns, meaning they're tightly integrated with the app builder and don't require separate database administration. This is more seamless than connecting external databases (which require schema design and optimization knowledge) but less flexible because data is locked into Glide's proprietary format.
vs alternatives: More managed than self-hosted databases (no administration required) and more integrated than external databases (no separate configuration), though less portable than standard databases because data cannot be easily exported or migrated.
Provides basic chart components (bar, line, pie, area charts) that visualize data from connected sources. Charts are configured visually by selecting data columns for axes, values, and grouping. Charts are responsive and adapt to mobile/tablet/desktop. Real-time updates are supported; charts refresh when underlying data changes. No custom chart types or advanced visualization options (3D, animations, etc.) are available.
Unique: Provides basic chart components with automatic real-time updates and responsive design, suitable for simple dashboards — most visual builders (Bubble, FlutterFlow) require chart plugins or custom code
vs alternatives: More integrated than Airtable's chart view because real-time updates are automatic; weaker than BI tools (Tableau, Looker) because no drill-down, filtering, or advanced visualization options
Allows users to query data using natural language (e.g., 'Show me all orders from last month with revenue > $5k') which is converted to structured database queries without SQL knowledge. Also includes AI-powered data extraction from unstructured text (emails, documents, images) to populate spreadsheet columns. Implementation details (LLM model, context window, fine-tuning approach) are undocumented, but the feature appears to use prompt-based query generation with fallback to manual query building if AI fails.
Unique: Glide's natural language query feature bridges the gap between spreadsheet users (who think in English) and database queries (which require SQL). Rather than teaching users SQL, it translates natural language to structured queries, lowering the barrier to data exploration. The data extraction capability extends this to unstructured sources, automating data entry from emails and documents.
vs alternatives: More accessible than Airtable's formula language or traditional SQL, and more integrated than bolt-on AI query tools because it's built directly into the data layer rather than as a separate search interface.
+7 more capabilities