bge-large-en-v1.5 ranks higher at 52/100 vs Meta_Kaggle_Dataset_Archive_2026-03-12 at 20/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | Meta_Kaggle_Dataset_Archive_2026-03-12 | bge-large-en-v1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Dataset | Model |
| UnfragileRank | 20/100 | 52/100 |
| Adoption | 0 |
| 1 |
| Quality | 0 | 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 1 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 7 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Extracts and preserves structured metadata from Kaggle competitions including problem descriptions, evaluation metrics, submission requirements, and temporal data (launch dates, deadlines, prize pools). Implements a snapshot-based archival pattern that captures competition state at a specific point in time (2026-03-12), enabling historical analysis of competition evolution and trend tracking across 413K+ indexed competitions.
Unique: Provides a comprehensive frozen snapshot of 413K+ Kaggle competitions at a specific timestamp, enabling longitudinal analysis without real-time API rate limits or authentication requirements. Uses HuggingFace's distributed dataset infrastructure for efficient streaming and caching rather than direct Kaggle API scraping.
vs alternatives: Eliminates need for Kaggle API authentication and rate-limit management compared to direct API access, while providing pre-processed, deduplicated metadata at scale with built-in versioning through HuggingFace's dataset versioning system.
Enables semantic and categorical filtering across 413K+ competitions to surface relevant datasets based on domain, difficulty, prize pool, timeline, and problem type. Implements a multi-dimensional indexing pattern that allows fast subset extraction for specific research questions or use-case matching without loading the entire archive into memory.
Unique: Leverages HuggingFace's Arrow-backed columnar storage for sub-second filtering across 413K records without full dataset materialization, using lazy evaluation patterns that defer computation until results are explicitly materialized.
vs alternatives: Faster than SQL-based filtering on traditional databases because Arrow's columnar format enables vectorized predicate pushdown; more flexible than static CSV exports because filtering is dynamic and composable.
Provides curated subsets of competition metadata suitable for training supervised models that predict competition success metrics (participation, submission quality, completion rates). Implements stratified sampling and train/validation/test splitting patterns to ensure representative distributions across competition types, difficulty levels, and temporal periods.
Unique: Provides pre-stratified dataset splits that account for competition domain, difficulty, and temporal distribution, reducing the need for manual data preparation. Uses HuggingFace's dataset mapping and filtering to create reproducible, versioned training splits without external tooling.
vs alternatives: Eliminates manual data cleaning and splitting compared to raw Kaggle API exports; provides stratified sampling out-of-the-box whereas generic dataset tools require custom preprocessing logic.
Enables time-series analysis of competition metadata across the 2026-03-12 snapshot, supporting trend extraction, seasonality detection, and cohort analysis. Implements temporal bucketing patterns (by month, quarter, year) and rolling window aggregations to surface patterns in competition launch frequency, prize pool allocation, and domain popularity over time.
Unique: Provides pre-indexed temporal metadata enabling efficient bucketing and aggregation across 413K competitions without requiring custom date parsing or timezone handling. Supports rolling window operations natively through HuggingFace's map/filter API.
vs alternatives: More efficient than raw CSV time-series analysis because Arrow's columnar format enables vectorized datetime operations; simpler than building custom ETL pipelines because temporal fields are pre-standardized.
Segments the 413K+ competition archive into domain-specific subsets (computer vision, NLP, tabular data, time-series, etc.) using categorical metadata. Implements hierarchical categorization patterns that enable both broad domain analysis and fine-grained sub-category exploration, with support for multi-label assignments where competitions span multiple domains.
Unique: Provides pre-categorized competition segments enabling instant domain-specific analysis without manual tagging or classification. Supports hierarchical domain relationships (e.g., NLP as a subcategory of AI) through nested categorical structures.
vs alternatives: Faster than building custom domain classifiers because categories are pre-assigned; more maintainable than hardcoded domain filters because categorization is centralized in the archive metadata.
Extracts and analyzes prize pool data across competitions, enabling comparative analysis of incentive structures, reward distributions, and their correlation with participation/submission metrics. Implements aggregation patterns that normalize prize data across different currencies and time periods to enable fair cross-competition comparisons.
Unique: Aggregates prize data across 413K competitions with built-in support for currency normalization and temporal adjustment, enabling fair comparisons across competitions launched in different years and regions without manual data cleaning.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than individual competition prize data because it provides statistical context across the entire archive; simpler than building custom ETL for prize normalization because currency handling is pre-implemented.
Provides versioned, citable access to the competition archive through HuggingFace's dataset versioning system, enabling reproducible research with guaranteed data consistency across time. Implements immutable snapshot patterns where each version is pinned to a specific commit hash, allowing researchers to reference exact dataset versions in publications and ensure other researchers can reproduce analyses.
Unique: Leverages HuggingFace's Git-based versioning to provide immutable, commit-pinned dataset snapshots with automatic version tracking and changelog generation. Enables researchers to specify exact dataset versions in code (e.g., `revision='2026-03-12'`) for reproducible analyses.
vs alternatives: More reproducible than static CSV downloads because versions are tracked centrally; simpler than managing dataset versions in Git because HuggingFace handles versioning infrastructure automatically.
Converts English text passages into 1024-dimensional dense vector embeddings using a fine-tuned BERT architecture with contrastive learning objectives. The model applies mean pooling over token representations and normalizes outputs to unit vectors, enabling efficient similarity computations via cosine distance or dot product. Trained on diverse text pairs using in-batch negatives and hard negative mining to optimize for semantic relevance across retrieval and ranking tasks.
Unique: Achieves top-tier MTEB ranking (56.9 on NDCG@10 for retrieval) through contrastive pre-training on 430M text pairs with hard negatives, then instruction-tuning on 50+ retrieval/ranking tasks — architectural choice of mean pooling + L2 normalization enables efficient batch similarity computation without query-specific fine-tuning
vs alternatives: Outperforms OpenAI's text-embedding-3-small on MTEB retrieval benchmarks while remaining fully open-source and deployable on-premise without API costs
Computes cosine similarity between pairs of embedded texts by taking the dot product of L2-normalized vectors, producing scores in range [-1, 1] where 1.0 indicates semantic equivalence. The normalization step is built into the embedding generation pipeline, allowing single-pass similarity computation without additional normalization overhead. Supports batch processing of multiple query-document pairs simultaneously for throughput optimization.
Unique: Embeddings are pre-normalized to unit vectors during generation, eliminating the need for post-hoc normalization in similarity computation — this design choice reduces latency for high-throughput ranking scenarios by ~15% compared to models requiring explicit normalization
vs alternatives: Faster similarity computation than sparse BM25 for large-scale ranking due to vector normalization baked into the model, while maintaining competitive NDCG scores on MTEB benchmarks
bge-large-en-v1.5 scores higher at 52/100 vs Meta_Kaggle_Dataset_Archive_2026-03-12 at 20/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Generates fixed-dimensional embeddings compatible with FAISS, Annoy, HNSW, and other ANN index structures for sub-linear retrieval over large document collections. The 1024-dimensional output and L2-normalization enable efficient index construction and querying; typical index sizes are 4 bytes per dimension per document. Supports both exact brute-force search and approximate methods with configurable recall-speed tradeoffs.
Unique: 1024-dimensional vectors with L2-normalization are optimized for HNSW graph construction, achieving 95%+ recall at 10ms latency on 1M-document indices — this dimensionality-normalization combination balances index size, construction time, and query latency better than higher-dimensional alternatives
vs alternatives: Smaller index footprint than OpenAI embeddings (1024 vs 1536 dims) while maintaining superior MTEB retrieval scores, reducing storage and memory costs for large-scale deployments
Provides pre-converted model weights in PyTorch, ONNX, and SafeTensors formats, enabling deployment across diverse inference runtimes without custom conversion pipelines. ONNX export includes quantization-friendly graph structures; SafeTensors format enables fast weight loading and memory-mapped access. Supports both CPU and GPU inference with automatic device selection via sentence-transformers library.
Unique: Provides SafeTensors format alongside ONNX and PyTorch, enabling secure weight loading without code execution and memory-mapped access for efficient large-model inference — architectural choice to support three formats simultaneously reduces friction for diverse deployment targets
vs alternatives: Multi-format export reduces deployment friction compared to models requiring custom conversion pipelines; SafeTensors format provides security advantages over pickle-based PyTorch checkpoints
Accepts optional instruction prefixes (e.g., 'Represent this document for retrieval:') that guide embedding generation toward specific downstream tasks without model fine-tuning. Instructions are concatenated with input text and processed through the same BERT encoder, allowing single-model deployment across retrieval, clustering, and classification tasks. Instruction tuning was performed on 50+ diverse tasks during training, enabling zero-shot adaptation to new domains.
Unique: Instruction tuning on 50+ diverse tasks enables zero-shot task adaptation without fine-tuning, allowing single-model deployment across retrieval, clustering, and classification — architectural choice to embed instructions in the input stream rather than as separate model parameters reduces deployment complexity
vs alternatives: Enables task-specific embeddings without separate models or fine-tuning, reducing deployment overhead compared to task-specific embedding models while maintaining competitive performance on MTEB benchmarks
Processes multiple text inputs simultaneously through vectorized matrix operations, achieving 10-50x throughput improvement over sequential embedding generation. Batch size is configurable (typical: 32-256) and automatically optimized based on available GPU memory. Supports dynamic batching where variable-length sequences are padded to the longest sequence in the batch, minimizing wasted computation.
Unique: Dynamic batching with automatic padding enables 10-50x throughput improvement over sequential processing while maintaining numerical consistency — architectural choice to vectorize padding and masking operations in the BERT encoder reduces per-token overhead
vs alternatives: Batch processing throughput exceeds OpenAI's embedding API (which charges per-token) by 5-10x on large corpora, enabling cost-effective offline embedding pipelines
Model includes pre-computed evaluation results on MTEB (Massive Text Embedding Benchmark) covering 56 tasks across retrieval, clustering, semantic similarity, and reranking domains. Results are published on HuggingFace model card with detailed breakdowns by task category, enabling direct comparison against 200+ alternative embedding models. Evaluation methodology is standardized and reproducible via the MTEB library.
Unique: Ranks #1 on MTEB retrieval leaderboard (56.9 NDCG@10) through instruction-tuned contrastive learning on 430M pairs — architectural choice to optimize for MTEB tasks during training enables transparent performance comparison against 200+ alternatives
vs alternatives: Achieves top MTEB ranking while remaining fully open-source, providing transparent performance comparison unavailable for proprietary APIs like OpenAI embeddings
Model is compatible with Text Embeddings Inference (TEI) server, a Rust-based inference engine optimized for embedding workloads with features like batching, quantization, and multi-GPU support. TEI automatically handles model loading, request routing, and response formatting, enabling production-grade embedding APIs without custom inference code. Supports both HTTP and gRPC interfaces.
Unique: TEI compatibility enables production-grade embedding APIs without custom inference code — architectural choice to support TEI's Rust-based engine provides 2-3x throughput improvement over Python-based servers while maintaining model compatibility
vs alternatives: TEI deployment provides higher throughput and lower latency than custom Python inference servers, enabling cost-effective embedding APIs at scale
+1 more capabilities