| 1 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Starting Price | — | $25/mo |
| Capabilities | 12 decomposed | 15 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Implements Model Context Protocol server that bridges MCP clients (Claude Desktop, IDEs, agents) to Z.AI's backend API infrastructure. Uses stdio/SSE transport to expose Z.AI's language models, vision models, and tool capabilities through standardized MCP protocol, abstracting away Z.AI API authentication (Bearer token), endpoint routing, and request/response marshaling. Handles protocol negotiation, capability advertisement, and bidirectional message passing between MCP client and Z.AI backend.
Unique: Provides MCP server wrapper specifically for Z.AI's multi-model ecosystem (GLM-5.1, GLM-5V-Turbo, CogView-4, CogVideoX-3, etc.) with dual API endpoint routing (general vs coding-specific), enabling seamless MCP client integration without direct API management
vs alternatives: Simpler than building custom MCP servers for each model provider; standardizes Z.AI access across MCP-compatible tools (Claude Desktop, Cline, etc.) vs direct REST API integration
Exposes Z.AI's language model family (GLM-5.1, GLM-5, GLM-5-Turbo, GLM-4.7, GLM-4.6, GLM-4.5, GLM-4-32B-0414-128K) through MCP tool interface, routing requests to appropriate model based on capability requirements (context window, latency, cost). Implements model selection logic that abstracts model-specific parameters, token limits, and performance characteristics. Supports streaming and batch inference modes with configurable temperature, top-p, and other generation parameters.
Unique: Provides unified MCP interface to Z.AI's heterogeneous model family with different context windows (GLM-4-32B-0414-128K at 128K vs standard models) and performance tiers (GLM-5.1 flagship vs GLM-5-Turbo cost-optimized), enabling dynamic model selection without client-side logic
vs alternatives: More flexible than single-model MCP servers; reduces client complexity vs managing multiple model endpoints directly
Implements Bearer token authentication for Z.AI API access, accepting API keys from Z.AI Open Platform and converting them to Bearer tokens for API requests. Handles token lifecycle (generation, refresh if applicable, expiration), secure storage (environment variables or secure config), and per-request token injection into Authorization headers. Implements error handling for invalid/expired tokens with clear error messages.
Unique: Implements Bearer token authentication for Z.AI API with secure API key management, enabling MCP server to authenticate without exposing credentials in client code
vs alternatives: More secure than embedding API keys in client code; centralizes authentication in MCP server
Implements MCP protocol capability advertisement, informing clients of available models, tools, and resources exposed by the server. Uses MCP protocol initialization handshake to exchange supported capabilities, protocol version, and implementation details. Enables clients to discover available models (GLM-5.1, GLM-5V-Turbo, CogView-4, etc.) and tools (web search, function calling, etc.) without hardcoding assumptions.
Unique: Implements MCP protocol capability advertisement for Z.AI models and tools, enabling dynamic client discovery of available capabilities without hardcoding
vs alternatives: More flexible than static client configuration; enables clients to adapt to server capabilities at runtime
Exposes Z.AI's vision model family (GLM-5V-Turbo, GLM-4.6V, GLM-4.5V) and specialized models (GLM-OCR for document extraction, AutoGLM-Phone-Multilingual for mobile UI understanding) through MCP tool interface. Accepts image inputs (base64, URL, or file path) and processes them with vision-specific models, returning structured analysis (object detection, text extraction, scene understanding, OCR results). Implements image preprocessing (resizing, format conversion) and model-specific input validation.
Unique: Integrates specialized vision models (GLM-OCR for document extraction, AutoGLM-Phone-Multilingual for mobile UI) alongside general vision models (GLM-5V-Turbo), enabling domain-specific image understanding without model selection complexity in client code
vs alternatives: More specialized than generic vision APIs; combines document OCR, general vision, and mobile UI understanding in single MCP interface vs separate service integrations
Exposes Z.AI's image generation model (CogView-4) through MCP tool interface, accepting text prompts and optional style parameters to generate images. Implements prompt processing, style embedding, and image encoding (base64 or URL return format). Supports iterative refinement through prompt modification without explicit inpainting, leveraging CogView-4's prompt understanding for style consistency.
Unique: Provides MCP interface to CogView-4 image generation with style control through prompt engineering, enabling text-to-image generation without separate image API management
vs alternatives: Simpler integration than managing separate image generation APIs; unified MCP interface for both image understanding (vision models) and generation (CogView-4)
Exposes Z.AI's video generation models (CogVideoX-3, Vidu Q1, Vidu 2) through MCP tool interface, accepting text prompts or image+text inputs to generate short videos. Implements video encoding, streaming output, and asynchronous generation handling (polling or webhook-based completion notification). Supports different video quality/length tradeoffs across model variants.
Unique: Provides MCP interface to multiple video generation models (CogVideoX-3, Vidu Q1, Vidu 2) with different quality/speed tradeoffs, handling async generation and output delivery through MCP protocol
vs alternatives: Abstracts video generation complexity (async jobs, polling, file delivery) into MCP tool interface; supports multiple model variants vs single-model video APIs
Exposes Z.AI's automatic speech recognition model (GLM-ASR-2512) through MCP tool interface, accepting audio input (file, URL, or stream) and returning transcribed text with optional speaker identification and timestamp metadata. Implements audio format detection, preprocessing (resampling, normalization), and streaming transcription for long audio files.
Unique: Provides MCP interface to GLM-ASR-2512 speech recognition model with streaming support for long audio, enabling voice input integration into MCP-based agents without separate audio processing infrastructure
vs alternatives: Simpler than managing separate ASR APIs; integrated into Z.AI MCP server alongside text, vision, and video models
+4 more capabilities
Automatically inspects tabular data sources (Google Sheets, Airtable, Excel, CSV, SQL databases) to extract column names, infer field types (text, number, date, checkbox, etc.), and create bidirectional data bindings between UI components and source columns. Uses declarative component-to-column mappings that persist schema changes in real-time, enabling components to automatically reflect upstream data structure modifications without manual rebinding.
Unique: Glide's approach combines automatic schema introspection with declarative component binding, eliminating manual field mapping that competitors like Airtable require. The bidirectional sync model means changes to source column structure automatically propagate to UI components without developer intervention, reducing maintenance overhead for non-technical users.
vs alternatives: Faster to initial app than Airtable (which requires manual field configuration) and more flexible than rigid form builders because it adapts to evolving data structures automatically.
Provides 40+ pre-built, data-aware UI components (forms, tables, calendars, charts, buttons, text inputs, dropdowns, file uploads, maps, etc.) that automatically render responsively across mobile and desktop viewports. Components use a declarative binding syntax to connect to spreadsheet columns, with built-in support for computed fields, conditional visibility, and user-specific data filtering. Layout engine uses CSS Grid/Flexbox under the hood to adapt component sizing and positioning based on screen size without requiring manual breakpoint configuration.
Unique: Glide's component library is tightly integrated with data binding — components are not generic UI elements but data-aware objects that automatically sync with spreadsheet columns. This eliminates the disconnect between UI and data that exists in traditional form builders, where developers must manually wire component values to data sources.
vs alternatives: Faster to build than Bubble (which requires manual component-to-data wiring) and more mobile-optimized than Airtable's grid-centric interface, which prioritizes desktop spreadsheet metaphors over mobile-first design.
Glide scores higher at 70/100 vs @z_ai/mcp-server at 35/100. @z_ai/mcp-server leads on ecosystem, while Glide is stronger on adoption and quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Enables multiple team members to edit apps simultaneously with role-based access control. Supports predefined roles (Owner, Editor, Viewer) with different permission levels: Owners can manage team members and publish apps, Editors can modify app design and data, Viewers can only view published apps. Team member limits vary by plan (2 free, 10 business, custom enterprise). Real-time collaboration on app design is not mentioned, suggesting changes may not be synchronized in real-time between editors.
Unique: Glide's team collaboration is built into the platform, meaning team members don't need separate accounts or complex permission configuration — they're invited via email and assigned roles directly in the app. This is more seamless than tools requiring external identity management.
vs alternatives: More integrated than Airtable (which requires separate workspace management) and simpler than GitHub-based collaboration (which requires version control knowledge), though less sophisticated than enterprise platforms with audit logging and approval workflows.
Provides pre-built app templates for common use cases (inventory management, CRM, project management, expense tracking, etc.) that users can clone and customize. Templates include sample data, pre-configured components, and example workflows, reducing time-to-first-app from hours to minutes. Templates are fully editable, allowing users to modify data sources, components, and workflows to match their specific needs. Template library is curated by Glide and updated regularly with new templates.
Unique: Glide's templates are fully functional apps with sample data and workflows, not just empty scaffolds. This allows users to immediately see how components work together and understand app structure before customizing, reducing the learning curve significantly.
vs alternatives: More complete than Airtable's templates (which are mostly empty bases) and more accessible than building from scratch, though less flexible than code-based frameworks where templates can be parameterized and generated programmatically.
Allows workflows to be triggered on a schedule (daily, weekly, monthly, or custom intervals) without manual intervention. Scheduled workflows execute at specified times and can perform batch operations (process pending records, send daily reports, sync data, etc.). Execution time is in UTC, and the exact scheduling mechanism (cron, quartz, custom) is undocumented. Failed scheduled tasks may or may not retry automatically (retry logic undocumented).
Unique: Glide's scheduled workflows are integrated with the workflow engine, meaning scheduled tasks can execute the same complex logic as event-triggered workflows (conditional logic, multi-step actions, API calls). This is more powerful than simple scheduled email tools because scheduled tasks can perform data transformations and cross-system synchronization.
vs alternatives: More integrated than Zapier's schedule trigger (which is limited to simple actions) and more accessible than cron jobs (which require server access and scripting knowledge), though less transparent about execution guarantees and failure handling than enterprise job schedulers.
Offers Glide Tables, a proprietary managed database alternative to external spreadsheets or databases, with automatic scaling and optimization for Glide apps. Glide Tables are stored in Glide's infrastructure and optimized for the data binding and query patterns used by Glide apps. Scaling limits are plan-dependent (25k-100k rows), with separate 'Big Tables' tier for larger datasets (exact scaling limits undocumented). Automatic backups and disaster recovery are mentioned but details are undocumented.
Unique: Glide Tables are optimized specifically for Glide's data binding and query patterns, meaning they're tightly integrated with the app builder and don't require separate database administration. This is more seamless than connecting external databases (which require schema design and optimization knowledge) but less flexible because data is locked into Glide's proprietary format.
vs alternatives: More managed than self-hosted databases (no administration required) and more integrated than external databases (no separate configuration), though less portable than standard databases because data cannot be easily exported or migrated.
Provides basic chart components (bar, line, pie, area charts) that visualize data from connected sources. Charts are configured visually by selecting data columns for axes, values, and grouping. Charts are responsive and adapt to mobile/tablet/desktop. Real-time updates are supported; charts refresh when underlying data changes. No custom chart types or advanced visualization options (3D, animations, etc.) are available.
Unique: Provides basic chart components with automatic real-time updates and responsive design, suitable for simple dashboards — most visual builders (Bubble, FlutterFlow) require chart plugins or custom code
vs alternatives: More integrated than Airtable's chart view because real-time updates are automatic; weaker than BI tools (Tableau, Looker) because no drill-down, filtering, or advanced visualization options
Allows users to query data using natural language (e.g., 'Show me all orders from last month with revenue > $5k') which is converted to structured database queries without SQL knowledge. Also includes AI-powered data extraction from unstructured text (emails, documents, images) to populate spreadsheet columns. Implementation details (LLM model, context window, fine-tuning approach) are undocumented, but the feature appears to use prompt-based query generation with fallback to manual query building if AI fails.
Unique: Glide's natural language query feature bridges the gap between spreadsheet users (who think in English) and database queries (which require SQL). Rather than teaching users SQL, it translates natural language to structured queries, lowering the barrier to data exploration. The data extraction capability extends this to unstructured sources, automating data entry from emails and documents.
vs alternatives: More accessible than Airtable's formula language or traditional SQL, and more integrated than bolt-on AI query tools because it's built directly into the data layer rather than as a separate search interface.
+7 more capabilities