@kuindji/memory-domain
FrameworkFreeDomain-driven memory engine with graph storage, embeddings, and semantic search
Capabilities10 decomposed
domain-driven graph-based memory storage with semantic indexing
Medium confidenceStores memories as nodes in a directed graph structure with domain-driven design principles, enabling relationships between memory entities to be explicitly modeled and traversed. Uses embedding vectors to index memory content semantically, allowing memories to be retrieved not just by exact match but by conceptual similarity. The graph structure persists relationships between domain entities (e.g., users, conversations, events) as first-class citizens rather than denormalized fields.
Implements domain-driven design patterns (aggregates, value objects, bounded contexts) as first-class concepts in the memory layer, allowing developers to define domain models that automatically structure the graph topology rather than forcing a generic key-value or document model
Differs from vector-only RAG systems (Pinecone, Weaviate) by explicitly modeling entity relationships as graph edges, enabling reasoning over connected entities rather than just similarity-ranked documents
semantic similarity search with embedding-based retrieval
Medium confidenceImplements vector similarity search by computing embeddings for memory queries and comparing them against stored memory embeddings using distance metrics (cosine, Euclidean). Returns ranked results ordered by semantic relevance rather than keyword overlap. Supports configurable embedding models and distance functions, allowing swapping between different embedding providers without changing query logic.
Integrates embedding computation and similarity search as a core abstraction within the domain model layer, allowing domain entities to define custom embedding strategies (e.g., embedding only certain fields, combining multiple embeddings) rather than treating embeddings as a separate indexing concern
More flexible than specialized vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for small-to-medium deployments because it allows embedding model swapping and custom distance metrics without vendor lock-in, though it lacks the distributed scale and query optimization of dedicated vector DBs
configurable memory persistence with pluggable storage adapters
Medium confidenceProvides an abstraction layer for memory persistence that decouples the domain model from storage implementation. Developers can implement custom storage adapters (file-based, database, cloud storage) by conforming to a standard interface, enabling memories to be persisted to any backend without changing application code. Supports both synchronous and asynchronous persistence operations.
Uses adapter pattern at the domain layer rather than the infrastructure layer, allowing domain aggregates to define persistence requirements (e.g., 'this memory must be encrypted') that adapters must satisfy, rather than treating persistence as a generic concern
More flexible than ORMs (TypeORM, Sequelize) for memory-specific workloads because it doesn't assume relational schemas and allows custom serialization logic, though it requires more manual adapter implementation than full-featured ORMs
memory relationship modeling and graph traversal
Medium confidenceAllows defining typed relationships between memory entities (e.g., 'mentions', 'references', 'contradicts') and traversing the graph to discover connected memories. Relationships are first-class objects with properties, enabling rich semantic connections beyond simple foreign keys. Supports depth-limited traversal, filtering by relationship type, and aggregating results across multiple paths.
Models relationships as domain aggregates with properties and behavior, rather than simple edges, enabling relationship-specific logic (e.g., a 'contradicts' relationship can compute contradiction strength) and relationship versioning
Richer than simple document references (MongoDB, Firestore) because relationships are typed and queryable; simpler than dedicated graph databases (Neo4j) for small-to-medium graphs and doesn't require a separate database system
memory lifecycle management with temporal tracking
Medium confidenceTracks memory creation, modification, and access timestamps, enabling time-based queries and memory aging strategies. Supports marking memories as archived, deleted, or expired, and provides hooks for lifecycle events (on-create, on-update, on-access). Enables implementing memory decay (older memories ranked lower) and retention policies without manual cleanup.
Integrates temporal tracking as a domain concern rather than a storage concern, allowing domain aggregates to define custom decay functions and lifecycle policies that are independent of the storage backend
More flexible than TTL-based expiration (Redis, DynamoDB) because it supports custom decay functions and lifecycle hooks; simpler than time-series databases (InfluxDB, TimescaleDB) for memory-specific workloads
domain model definition with type-safe memory schemas
Medium confidenceProvides a framework for defining domain models (entities, value objects, aggregates) with type safety, enabling developers to structure memories according to domain concepts rather than generic key-value pairs. Supports validation, serialization, and custom methods on domain objects. Type definitions enable IDE autocomplete and compile-time checking for memory operations.
Implements domain-driven design at the type level, allowing domain models to be defined as classes with methods and validation logic, rather than as separate schema definitions, enabling domain logic to live with domain data
More expressive than JSON Schema for domain modeling because it supports methods and inheritance; more flexible than ORMs (TypeORM) because it doesn't assume relational structure
batch memory operations with transaction-like semantics
Medium confidenceSupports performing multiple memory operations (create, update, delete, relate) as a logical unit with rollback on failure. Implements optimistic concurrency control or pessimistic locking depending on configuration. Enables efficient bulk operations without individual round-trips to storage, useful for syncing large memory sets or performing complex multi-step memory updates.
Implements transaction semantics at the domain layer rather than delegating to storage, allowing domain-specific rollback logic (e.g., cascading deletes, relationship cleanup) that adapters don't need to understand
Simpler than distributed transactions (Saga pattern) for single-instance deployments; more flexible than database transactions because it can span multiple storage adapters
memory query language with filtering and aggregation
Medium confidenceProvides a query API for filtering memories by properties, relationships, and temporal criteria, with support for aggregation operations (count, group-by, statistics). Queries are composable and can be combined with semantic search. Supports both simple property filters and complex nested queries on related entities.
Integrates structured filtering with semantic search in a single query API, allowing developers to combine property filters with similarity scores without separate query paths
More flexible than document database queries (MongoDB) for memory-specific workloads because it understands domain relationships; simpler than SQL for non-relational memory structures
memory context window management for llm integration
Medium confidenceAutomatically selects and ranks relevant memories to fit within an LLM's context window, using a combination of semantic similarity, recency, and importance scores. Provides utilities to format selected memories for LLM prompts and manage token budgets. Supports context prioritization strategies (e.g., prioritize recent memories, prioritize high-importance memories).
Combines semantic similarity with domain-aware prioritization (e.g., relationship importance, temporal decay) rather than using similarity scores alone, enabling context selection that respects domain semantics
More sophisticated than simple similarity-based context selection because it considers recency and importance; simpler than full context compression techniques (summarization, distillation)
memory deduplication and conflict resolution
Medium confidenceDetects semantically similar or duplicate memories and provides strategies for merging or resolving conflicts. Supports fuzzy matching on properties and embedding-based similarity detection. Allows defining custom conflict resolution rules (e.g., keep newest, merge properties, flag for manual review). Prevents memory bloat from repeated information.
Implements deduplication at the domain level with custom conflict resolution rules, rather than as a generic data cleaning step, allowing domain-specific logic (e.g., 'contradicting memories are valuable, don't merge them')
More flexible than database-level deduplication (unique constraints) because it supports fuzzy matching and custom merge logic; more sophisticated than simple hash-based deduplication because it understands semantic similarity
Capabilities are decomposed by AI analysis. Each maps to specific user intents and improves with match feedback.
Related Artifactssharing capabilities
Artifacts that share capabilities with @kuindji/memory-domain, ranked by overlap. Discovered automatically through the match graph.
mem0ai
Long-term memory for AI Agents
@membank/core
Core library for membank — handles storage, embeddings, deduplication, and semantic search.
Memory Box MCP Server
Save, search, and format memories with semantic understanding. Enhance your memory management by leveraging advanced semantic search capabilities directly from Cline. Organize and retrieve your memories efficiently with structured formatting and detailed context.
Semantic Kernel
Microsoft's SDK for integrating LLMs into apps — plugins, planners, and memory in C#/Python/Java.
Jean Memory
** - Premium memory consistent across all AI applications.
Eidolon
Multi Agent SDK with pluggable, modular components
Best For
- ✓AI agents and chatbots requiring persistent, relationship-aware context
- ✓Teams building knowledge management systems with domain-specific entity models
- ✓Developers implementing multi-turn dialogue systems where entity relationships drive conversation flow
- ✓LLM-powered agents needing context retrieval that understands intent, not just keywords
- ✓Conversational AI systems where user queries vary in phrasing but refer to the same concepts
- ✓Knowledge base systems serving non-technical users who may not know exact terminology
- ✓Teams building multi-tenant systems where storage requirements vary per tenant
- ✓Developers prototyping with in-memory storage but planning production database migration
Known Limitations
- ⚠Graph traversal performance degrades with very large graphs (>100k nodes) without proper indexing strategy
- ⚠Embedding-based retrieval requires pre-computed vectors; real-time embedding generation adds latency per query
- ⚠No built-in distributed graph storage — single-instance deployments only without external graph database integration
- ⚠Embedding quality depends entirely on the embedding model used; poor embeddings produce poor retrieval
- ⚠Requires pre-computing embeddings for all stored memories, adding storage overhead (~1-2KB per memory for typical embeddings)
- ⚠Semantic search cannot distinguish between homonyms or context-dependent meanings without additional metadata
Requirements
Input / Output
UnfragileRank
UnfragileRank is computed from adoption signals, documentation quality, ecosystem connectivity, match graph feedback, and freshness. No artifact can pay for a higher rank.
Repository Details
Package Details
About
Domain-driven memory engine with graph storage, embeddings, and semantic search
Categories
Alternatives to @kuindji/memory-domain
Search the Supabase docs for up-to-date guidance and troubleshoot errors quickly. Manage organizations, projects, databases, and Edge Functions, including migrations, SQL, logs, advisors, keys, and type generation, in one flow. Create and manage development branches to iterate safely, confirm costs
Compare →Are you the builder of @kuindji/memory-domain?
Claim this artifact to get a verified badge, access match analytics, see which intents users search for, and manage your listing.
Get the weekly brief
New tools, rising stars, and what's actually worth your time. No spam.
Data Sources
Looking for something else?
Search →