MCP Server for OpenTelemetry
MCP ServerFreeHey HN, Gal, Nir and Doron here.Over the past 2 years, we've helped teams debug everything from prompt issues to production outages.We kept running into the same problem: Jumping between our IDEs and our observability dashboards. So, we built an open-source MCP server that connects any OpenTel
Capabilities11 decomposed
opentelemetry trace collection and export via mcp protocol
Medium confidenceExposes OpenTelemetry trace data (spans, metrics, logs) through the Model Context Protocol (MCP) interface, allowing Claude and other MCP-compatible clients to query and analyze observability data without direct instrumentation. Implements MCP resource and tool handlers that translate OpenTelemetry SDK exports into structured JSON payloads compatible with LLM consumption, bridging observability backends (Jaeger, Datadog, etc.) with AI-driven analysis workflows.
First MCP server to expose OpenTelemetry signals as queryable resources, enabling Claude to directly analyze trace data without intermediate APIs or custom exporters. Uses MCP's resource discovery pattern to surface trace hierarchies and metric schemas dynamically.
Eliminates the need for custom REST APIs or webhook handlers to feed observability data to LLMs; MCP's bidirectional protocol allows Claude to request specific traces rather than receiving bulk exports.
trace-aware context injection for claude conversations
Medium confidenceAutomatically enriches Claude's conversation context with relevant trace spans and metrics based on user queries about system behavior. Implements semantic matching between natural language questions (e.g., 'why is checkout slow?') and OpenTelemetry span attributes, then injects matched trace data into the prompt context. Uses MCP's context attachment mechanism to maintain trace lineage across multi-turn conversations.
Uses MCP's resource attachment pattern combined with semantic span matching to automatically surface relevant traces without explicit user queries for trace IDs. Maintains trace context across conversation turns via MCP's stateful resource model.
More intelligent than static trace export; Claude can ask follow-up questions and receive additional traces without manual context switching, unlike traditional observability dashboards.
trace-based root cause analysis with claude reasoning
Medium confidenceOrchestrates multi-step root cause analysis by having Claude reason over traces, metrics, and logs to identify the underlying cause of issues. Implements a reasoning loop where Claude formulates hypotheses, requests specific traces or metrics to test them, and iteratively narrows down the root cause. Uses MCP's tool invocation pattern to enable Claude to request additional data as needed during analysis, without requiring upfront context injection.
Enables Claude to conduct iterative root cause analysis by requesting specific traces and metrics based on reasoning, rather than requiring all data upfront. Uses MCP's tool invocation to support multi-step debugging workflows.
More efficient than static trace export; Claude can ask targeted questions and receive only relevant data, unlike bulk trace analysis that may overwhelm context limits.
multi-backend trace aggregation and normalization
Medium confidenceAbstracts multiple OpenTelemetry exporters and trace backends (Jaeger, Datadog, Grafana Tempo, etc.) behind a unified MCP interface, normalizing span and metric schemas across different backend formats. Implements adapter pattern with backend-specific translators that convert proprietary trace formats into canonical OpenTelemetry JSON representation, allowing Claude to query traces from heterogeneous sources without backend-specific knowledge.
Implements adapter pattern at MCP layer to normalize heterogeneous trace backends into OpenTelemetry canonical format, enabling single-query access to multi-vendor observability without backend-specific client libraries.
Unlike vendor-specific MCP servers, this provides backend-agnostic trace access; unlike manual API integration, adapters handle schema translation automatically.
span filtering and sampling configuration via mcp tools
Medium confidenceExposes OpenTelemetry sampler configuration and span filtering rules as MCP tools, allowing Claude to dynamically adjust trace collection behavior based on analysis results. Implements MCP tool handlers that map to OpenTelemetry's Sampler interface, enabling Claude to request increased sampling for specific services or span attributes when investigating issues, without requiring application restarts.
Exposes OpenTelemetry Sampler interface as MCP tools, enabling Claude to dynamically adjust trace collection without application code changes. Uses MCP's tool invocation pattern to map high-level sampling requests to low-level SDK configuration.
More flexible than static sampling rules; allows Claude to respond to analysis findings by adjusting observability in real-time, unlike traditional APM tools that require manual configuration changes.
metric time-series querying and aggregation
Medium confidenceProvides MCP tools for querying OpenTelemetry metrics (counters, histograms, gauges) with time-range and aggregation support, translating natural language metric queries from Claude into PromQL-like expressions. Implements metric backend abstraction that supports Prometheus, Grafana, and OpenTelemetry Metrics API, with built-in aggregation functions (sum, avg, percentile, rate) and time-series downsampling for efficient context injection.
Translates natural language metric queries into backend-agnostic expressions with automatic aggregation and downsampling, allowing Claude to analyze metrics without PromQL knowledge. Integrates metric queries with trace context for correlated analysis.
More accessible than direct PromQL; Claude can ask 'what was the p99 latency during the outage?' and get results without manual query construction, unlike traditional dashboards.
log correlation with trace context
Medium confidenceImplements trace-to-log correlation by matching trace IDs and span IDs in log records with OpenTelemetry trace data, exposing correlated logs as MCP resources. Uses log backend APIs (ELK, Loki, Datadog) to retrieve logs with trace context, then enriches them with span metadata for unified analysis. Enables Claude to request logs for a specific trace and receive them pre-correlated without manual trace ID copying.
Automatically correlates logs with traces via trace ID matching, exposing correlated results as MCP resources that Claude can query without manual log-trace linking. Supports multiple log backends through adapter pattern.
More integrated than separate log and trace queries; Claude gets unified context automatically, unlike traditional observability tools requiring manual correlation.
span attribute schema discovery and validation
Medium confidenceIntrospects OpenTelemetry span attributes across collected traces to build a dynamic schema of available attributes, span types, and semantic conventions. Exposes this schema as MCP resources, allowing Claude to discover what span attributes are available and validate queries against the schema before execution. Implements schema caching with periodic updates to track schema evolution as new span types are introduced.
Dynamically discovers span attribute schemas from collected traces rather than requiring manual schema definition, enabling Claude to adapt to evolving instrumentation without configuration updates.
More flexible than static schema files; automatically reflects actual span structure in production, unlike documentation-based approaches that can drift from reality.
trace-based performance regression detection
Medium confidenceAnalyzes historical trace data to establish baseline performance metrics (latency percentiles, error rates) and detects deviations that indicate regressions. Implements statistical comparison of recent spans against historical baselines, exposing regression alerts as MCP resources that Claude can query. Uses time-series analysis to identify which services or operations have degraded performance, enabling Claude to correlate regressions with recent changes.
Implements statistical regression detection directly on trace data, enabling Claude to identify performance degradation without manual baseline management. Uses time-series analysis to distinguish regressions from normal variance.
More intelligent than threshold-based alerts; automatically adapts to system behavior patterns, unlike static performance thresholds that require manual tuning.
distributed trace visualization and dependency mapping
Medium confidenceReconstructs service dependency graphs from trace data by analyzing span parent-child relationships and service names, exposing the dependency map as MCP resources. Generates visual representations (ASCII or JSON) of trace trees showing request flow across services, latency at each hop, and error propagation. Enables Claude to understand system architecture from traces and identify bottlenecks in request paths.
Generates dependency maps directly from trace data rather than requiring manual configuration, enabling Claude to discover actual service interactions and bottlenecks without architecture documentation.
More accurate than static architecture diagrams; reflects actual request flows and latencies, unlike documentation that can become outdated.
anomaly detection in trace patterns
Medium confidenceApplies statistical and machine learning techniques to identify unusual patterns in trace data, such as unexpected error rates, latency spikes, or unusual span sequences. Implements anomaly detection algorithms (isolation forest, z-score analysis) that learn normal trace behavior and flag deviations as MCP resources. Enables Claude to ask 'what's unusual about this trace?' and receive anomaly explanations without manual threshold configuration.
Applies unsupervised anomaly detection to trace patterns, enabling Claude to identify unusual behavior without manual threshold configuration. Uses statistical models that adapt to system behavior over time.
More adaptive than rule-based anomaly detection; learns normal behavior automatically, unlike static thresholds that require manual tuning for each service.
Capabilities are decomposed by AI analysis. Each maps to specific user intents and improves with match feedback.
Related Artifactssharing capabilities
Artifacts that share capabilities with MCP Server for OpenTelemetry, ranked by overlap. Discovered automatically through the match graph.
mlflow-anthropic
Anthropic integration package for MLflow Tracing
@google-cloud/observability-mcp
MCP Server for GCP environment for interacting with various Observability APIs.
Rudel – Claude Code Session Analytics
We built rudel.ai after realizing we had no visibility into our own Claude Code sessions. We were using it daily but had no idea which sessions were efficient, why some got abandoned, or whether we were actually improving over time.So we built an analytics layer for it. After connecting our own sess
TrackMage
** - Shipment tracking api and logistics management capabilities through the [TrackMage API] (https://trackmage.com/)
ruflo
🌊 The leading agent orchestration platform for Claude. Deploy intelligent multi-agent swarms, coordinate autonomous workflows, and build conversational AI systems. Features enterprise-grade architecture, distributed swarm intelligence, RAG integration, and native Claude Code / Codex Integration
Boucle-framework
Autonomous agent framework with structured memory, safety hooks, and loop management. Built by the agent that runs on it.
Best For
- ✓DevOps engineers and SREs integrating observability with AI-assisted incident response
- ✓Platform teams building internal tools that combine tracing with LLM analysis
- ✓Developers debugging distributed systems using Claude as an analytical interface
- ✓On-call engineers using Claude for incident triage who want traces auto-loaded
- ✓Teams building AI-powered runbooks that reference live system traces
- ✓On-call engineers using Claude for incident triage
- ✓Teams building AI-powered runbooks for common issues
- ✓Organizations with multi-vendor observability stacks (e.g., Datadog + self-hosted Jaeger)
Known Limitations
- ⚠Requires OpenTelemetry SDK already instrumented in target application — does not auto-instrument code
- ⚠Performance depends on trace volume and cardinality; high-throughput systems may need sampling configuration
- ⚠MCP transport adds latency for real-time trace queries; best suited for post-incident analysis rather than live monitoring
- ⚠Limited to trace data types supported by OpenTelemetry spec; custom attributes require explicit schema mapping
- ⚠Semantic matching quality depends on span naming conventions; poorly named spans may not be retrieved
- ⚠Context injection adds token overhead; large trace trees may exceed Claude's context window
Requirements
Input / Output
UnfragileRank
UnfragileRank is computed from adoption signals, documentation quality, ecosystem connectivity, match graph feedback, and freshness. No artifact can pay for a higher rank.
About
Show HN: MCP Server for OpenTelemetry
Categories
Alternatives to MCP Server for OpenTelemetry
Search the Supabase docs for up-to-date guidance and troubleshoot errors quickly. Manage organizations, projects, databases, and Edge Functions, including migrations, SQL, logs, advisors, keys, and type generation, in one flow. Create and manage development branches to iterate safely, confirm costs
Compare →Are you the builder of MCP Server for OpenTelemetry?
Claim this artifact to get a verified badge, access match analytics, see which intents users search for, and manage your listing.
Get the weekly brief
New tools, rising stars, and what's actually worth your time. No spam.
Data Sources
Looking for something else?
Search →