Capability
20 artifacts provide this capability.
Want a personalized recommendation?
Find the best match →via “role-based access control with user groups and authentication”
No-code web apps from Airtable/Google Sheets — portals, tools, MVPs.
Unique: Integrates authentication and authorization into the visual builder without requiring backend code; users define roles and permissions through UI configuration rather than writing middleware or policy files. Custom user groups are stored in Softr's backend, enabling multi-tenant apps where different users see different data based on group membership.
vs others: Simpler than Auth0 or Okta for basic RBAC because it's built into the app builder (no separate service to configure). Less flexible than custom code because row-level security and complex permission logic are not supported; better for simple role-based scenarios (admin/viewer/editor).
via “role-based access control with granular permission enforcement”
AI platform for building internal business apps.
Unique: Enforces permissions at the server-side query layer before data is serialized, combined with attribute-based rules that evaluate user properties dynamically, ensuring that permission changes take effect immediately without requiring application redeployment
vs others: More granular than Airtable's sharing model because it supports field-level and record-level restrictions, and more flexible than Retool because it includes built-in ABAC evaluation rather than requiring custom middleware
via “role and access management”
Trigger workflows, manage worksheets, and collaborate on record discussions. Create, update, and delete records in bulk, generate share links, and get instant pivot summaries for insights. Administer roles, departments, and optionsets to control access and standardize data across your apps.
Unique: Utilizes a centralized model for role management that simplifies the administration of complex user permissions across multiple applications.
vs others: More streamlined than decentralized role management systems that require individual configuration for each application.
via “enterprise access control with server-level allowlists”
** 🌳 - Open-source, Self-hosted MCP server Gateway that connects your AI Agents to MCP Servers (for developers and enterprises)
Unique: Implements server-level access control with allowlists in enterprise mode, supporting multiple authentication methods (API keys, OAuth, mTLS) and providing audit logging, enabling multi-tenant deployments with fine-grained access restrictions without modifying upstream servers
vs others: Upstream MCP servers have no built-in access control; MCPJungle adds this capability at the gateway layer, enabling enterprises to enforce access policies centrally without requiring authentication logic in each server
via “secure access management”
Streamline workflows by connecting your app’s data and actions directly into your workspace. Discover and run key operations with clear, guided prompts. Boost productivity with secure, configurable access to the resources you use most.
Unique: The RBAC system is designed to be easily configurable through a visual interface, reducing the barrier for non-technical users.
vs others: More user-friendly than traditional security management systems, which often require extensive technical knowledge.
via “mcp resource and tool access control based on authentication context”
Plug and play auth for Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers
Unique: Implements authorization at the MCP tool/resource level rather than HTTP endpoint level, enabling per-capability access control that aligns with MCP's resource and tool calling model
vs others: More granular than HTTP-level authorization because it can enforce different policies per MCP tool or resource within a single endpoint
via “tool call access control with role-based policies”
Vloex MCP Gateway — stdio proxy for MCP tool call governance
Unique: Implements RBAC at the MCP proxy layer, allowing centralized tool access policies without modifying individual tool implementations or requiring client-side enforcement
vs others: More maintainable than distributing access control logic across multiple MCP servers, and more reliable than client-side enforcement since policies are enforced at the protocol boundary
via “role-based access control with granular permissions”
** - MySQL database integration with configurable access controls and schema inspection
Unique: Implements access control at the MCP server boundary rather than relying on MySQL user accounts, enabling fine-grained per-client restrictions without creating separate database users for each agent or client identity
vs others: Provides centralized access control for multiple agents sharing a single MySQL connection, whereas alternatives like separate MySQL users require managing N user accounts and connection strings for N agents
via “user-and-application-access-control”
via “user-authentication-and-access-control”
via “user authentication and access control”
via “user-authentication-and-access-control”
via “user authentication and access control”
via “user authentication and access control”
via “user authentication and access control configuration”
via “role-based access control and permissions”
via “authentication and access control management”
via “multi-user access control and permissions management”
via “user and role-based access control”
via “granular-access-control-for-autonomous-systems”
Building an AI tool with “User And Application Access Control”?
Submit your artifact →curl unfragile.ai/agents.md | sh© 2026 Unfragile. The platform for software for agents.